Cargando…
Engaging Adolescents and Young Adults in Decisions About Return of Genomic Research Results: a mixed-methods longitudinal clinical trial protocol
BACKGROUND: To protect minors’ future autonomy, professional organizations have historically discouraged returning predictive adult-onset genetic test results and carrier status to children. Recent clinical guidance diverges from this norm, suggesting that when minors have genomic sequencing perform...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Journal Experts
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10168476/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37162875 http://dx.doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2819191/v1 |
_version_ | 1785038862445182976 |
---|---|
author | Blumling, Amy McGowan, Michelle Prows, Cynthia Childers-Buschle, Kristin Martin, Lisa Lynch, John Dufendach, Kevin Lipstein, Ellen Kovacic, Melinda Butsch Brinkman, Bill Myers, Melanie |
author_facet | Blumling, Amy McGowan, Michelle Prows, Cynthia Childers-Buschle, Kristin Martin, Lisa Lynch, John Dufendach, Kevin Lipstein, Ellen Kovacic, Melinda Butsch Brinkman, Bill Myers, Melanie |
author_sort | Blumling, Amy |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To protect minors’ future autonomy, professional organizations have historically discouraged returning predictive adult-onset genetic test results and carrier status to children. Recent clinical guidance diverges from this norm, suggesting that when minors have genomic sequencing performed for clinical purposes, parents and children should have the opportunity to learn secondary findings, including for some adult-onset conditions. While parents can currently opt in or out of receiving their child’s secondary findings, the American Society of Human Genetics Workgroup on Pediatric Genetic and Genomic Testing suggests including adolescents in the decision-making process. However, it is not clear what factors young people consider when given the opportunity to learn genetic findings for themselves. We are examining adolescents’, young adults’, and parents’ (if applicable) decisions about learning genomic information for the adolescent. METHODS: We are enrolling assenting (ages 13–17) adolescents and consenting (ages 18–21) young adults in a prospective genomic screening study to assess the choices they make about receiving individual genomic results. Participants use an online tool to indicate whether they want to learn their personal genetic risk for specific preventable, treatable, and adult-onset conditions, as well as carrier status for autosomal recessive conditions. We are examining 1) how choices differ between adolescent and young adult cohorts (as well as between adolescents/young adults and parents) and 2) decisional conflict and stability across study timepoints. Results are returned based on participants’ choices. Qualitative interviews with a subset of participants explore decisional stability, adolescent/young adult engagement with parents in decision-making, and the impact of learning pathogenic/likely pathogenic and carrier results. DISCUSSION: This study explores decision making and decision stability between adolescents and parents (where applicable), as well as the ethical implications and impact of return of clinical-grade genetic research results to adolescents and young adults. The results of this study will contribute empirical evidence to support best practices and guidance on engaging young people in genetic research studies and clinical care that offer return of results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10168476 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | American Journal Experts |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101684762023-05-10 Engaging Adolescents and Young Adults in Decisions About Return of Genomic Research Results: a mixed-methods longitudinal clinical trial protocol Blumling, Amy McGowan, Michelle Prows, Cynthia Childers-Buschle, Kristin Martin, Lisa Lynch, John Dufendach, Kevin Lipstein, Ellen Kovacic, Melinda Butsch Brinkman, Bill Myers, Melanie Res Sq Article BACKGROUND: To protect minors’ future autonomy, professional organizations have historically discouraged returning predictive adult-onset genetic test results and carrier status to children. Recent clinical guidance diverges from this norm, suggesting that when minors have genomic sequencing performed for clinical purposes, parents and children should have the opportunity to learn secondary findings, including for some adult-onset conditions. While parents can currently opt in or out of receiving their child’s secondary findings, the American Society of Human Genetics Workgroup on Pediatric Genetic and Genomic Testing suggests including adolescents in the decision-making process. However, it is not clear what factors young people consider when given the opportunity to learn genetic findings for themselves. We are examining adolescents’, young adults’, and parents’ (if applicable) decisions about learning genomic information for the adolescent. METHODS: We are enrolling assenting (ages 13–17) adolescents and consenting (ages 18–21) young adults in a prospective genomic screening study to assess the choices they make about receiving individual genomic results. Participants use an online tool to indicate whether they want to learn their personal genetic risk for specific preventable, treatable, and adult-onset conditions, as well as carrier status for autosomal recessive conditions. We are examining 1) how choices differ between adolescent and young adult cohorts (as well as between adolescents/young adults and parents) and 2) decisional conflict and stability across study timepoints. Results are returned based on participants’ choices. Qualitative interviews with a subset of participants explore decisional stability, adolescent/young adult engagement with parents in decision-making, and the impact of learning pathogenic/likely pathogenic and carrier results. DISCUSSION: This study explores decision making and decision stability between adolescents and parents (where applicable), as well as the ethical implications and impact of return of clinical-grade genetic research results to adolescents and young adults. The results of this study will contribute empirical evidence to support best practices and guidance on engaging young people in genetic research studies and clinical care that offer return of results. American Journal Experts 2023-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10168476/ /pubmed/37162875 http://dx.doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2819191/v1 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, so long as attribution is given to the creator. The license allows for commercial use. |
spellingShingle | Article Blumling, Amy McGowan, Michelle Prows, Cynthia Childers-Buschle, Kristin Martin, Lisa Lynch, John Dufendach, Kevin Lipstein, Ellen Kovacic, Melinda Butsch Brinkman, Bill Myers, Melanie Engaging Adolescents and Young Adults in Decisions About Return of Genomic Research Results: a mixed-methods longitudinal clinical trial protocol |
title | Engaging Adolescents and Young Adults in Decisions About Return of Genomic Research Results: a mixed-methods longitudinal clinical trial protocol |
title_full | Engaging Adolescents and Young Adults in Decisions About Return of Genomic Research Results: a mixed-methods longitudinal clinical trial protocol |
title_fullStr | Engaging Adolescents and Young Adults in Decisions About Return of Genomic Research Results: a mixed-methods longitudinal clinical trial protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | Engaging Adolescents and Young Adults in Decisions About Return of Genomic Research Results: a mixed-methods longitudinal clinical trial protocol |
title_short | Engaging Adolescents and Young Adults in Decisions About Return of Genomic Research Results: a mixed-methods longitudinal clinical trial protocol |
title_sort | engaging adolescents and young adults in decisions about return of genomic research results: a mixed-methods longitudinal clinical trial protocol |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10168476/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37162875 http://dx.doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2819191/v1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT blumlingamy engagingadolescentsandyoungadultsindecisionsaboutreturnofgenomicresearchresultsamixedmethodslongitudinalclinicaltrialprotocol AT mcgowanmichelle engagingadolescentsandyoungadultsindecisionsaboutreturnofgenomicresearchresultsamixedmethodslongitudinalclinicaltrialprotocol AT prowscynthia engagingadolescentsandyoungadultsindecisionsaboutreturnofgenomicresearchresultsamixedmethodslongitudinalclinicaltrialprotocol AT childersbuschlekristin engagingadolescentsandyoungadultsindecisionsaboutreturnofgenomicresearchresultsamixedmethodslongitudinalclinicaltrialprotocol AT martinlisa engagingadolescentsandyoungadultsindecisionsaboutreturnofgenomicresearchresultsamixedmethodslongitudinalclinicaltrialprotocol AT lynchjohn engagingadolescentsandyoungadultsindecisionsaboutreturnofgenomicresearchresultsamixedmethodslongitudinalclinicaltrialprotocol AT dufendachkevin engagingadolescentsandyoungadultsindecisionsaboutreturnofgenomicresearchresultsamixedmethodslongitudinalclinicaltrialprotocol AT lipsteinellen engagingadolescentsandyoungadultsindecisionsaboutreturnofgenomicresearchresultsamixedmethodslongitudinalclinicaltrialprotocol AT kovacicmelindabutsch engagingadolescentsandyoungadultsindecisionsaboutreturnofgenomicresearchresultsamixedmethodslongitudinalclinicaltrialprotocol AT brinkmanbill engagingadolescentsandyoungadultsindecisionsaboutreturnofgenomicresearchresultsamixedmethodslongitudinalclinicaltrialprotocol AT myersmelanie engagingadolescentsandyoungadultsindecisionsaboutreturnofgenomicresearchresultsamixedmethodslongitudinalclinicaltrialprotocol |