Cargando…

Engaging Adolescents and Young Adults in Decisions About Return of Genomic Research Results: a mixed-methods longitudinal clinical trial protocol

BACKGROUND: To protect minors’ future autonomy, professional organizations have historically discouraged returning predictive adult-onset genetic test results and carrier status to children. Recent clinical guidance diverges from this norm, suggesting that when minors have genomic sequencing perform...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Blumling, Amy, McGowan, Michelle, Prows, Cynthia, Childers-Buschle, Kristin, Martin, Lisa, Lynch, John, Dufendach, Kevin, Lipstein, Ellen, Kovacic, Melinda Butsch, Brinkman, Bill, Myers, Melanie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Journal Experts 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10168476/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37162875
http://dx.doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2819191/v1
_version_ 1785038862445182976
author Blumling, Amy
McGowan, Michelle
Prows, Cynthia
Childers-Buschle, Kristin
Martin, Lisa
Lynch, John
Dufendach, Kevin
Lipstein, Ellen
Kovacic, Melinda Butsch
Brinkman, Bill
Myers, Melanie
author_facet Blumling, Amy
McGowan, Michelle
Prows, Cynthia
Childers-Buschle, Kristin
Martin, Lisa
Lynch, John
Dufendach, Kevin
Lipstein, Ellen
Kovacic, Melinda Butsch
Brinkman, Bill
Myers, Melanie
author_sort Blumling, Amy
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To protect minors’ future autonomy, professional organizations have historically discouraged returning predictive adult-onset genetic test results and carrier status to children. Recent clinical guidance diverges from this norm, suggesting that when minors have genomic sequencing performed for clinical purposes, parents and children should have the opportunity to learn secondary findings, including for some adult-onset conditions. While parents can currently opt in or out of receiving their child’s secondary findings, the American Society of Human Genetics Workgroup on Pediatric Genetic and Genomic Testing suggests including adolescents in the decision-making process. However, it is not clear what factors young people consider when given the opportunity to learn genetic findings for themselves. We are examining adolescents’, young adults’, and parents’ (if applicable) decisions about learning genomic information for the adolescent. METHODS: We are enrolling assenting (ages 13–17) adolescents and consenting (ages 18–21) young adults in a prospective genomic screening study to assess the choices they make about receiving individual genomic results. Participants use an online tool to indicate whether they want to learn their personal genetic risk for specific preventable, treatable, and adult-onset conditions, as well as carrier status for autosomal recessive conditions. We are examining 1) how choices differ between adolescent and young adult cohorts (as well as between adolescents/young adults and parents) and 2) decisional conflict and stability across study timepoints. Results are returned based on participants’ choices. Qualitative interviews with a subset of participants explore decisional stability, adolescent/young adult engagement with parents in decision-making, and the impact of learning pathogenic/likely pathogenic and carrier results. DISCUSSION: This study explores decision making and decision stability between adolescents and parents (where applicable), as well as the ethical implications and impact of return of clinical-grade genetic research results to adolescents and young adults. The results of this study will contribute empirical evidence to support best practices and guidance on engaging young people in genetic research studies and clinical care that offer return of results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10168476
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher American Journal Experts
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101684762023-05-10 Engaging Adolescents and Young Adults in Decisions About Return of Genomic Research Results: a mixed-methods longitudinal clinical trial protocol Blumling, Amy McGowan, Michelle Prows, Cynthia Childers-Buschle, Kristin Martin, Lisa Lynch, John Dufendach, Kevin Lipstein, Ellen Kovacic, Melinda Butsch Brinkman, Bill Myers, Melanie Res Sq Article BACKGROUND: To protect minors’ future autonomy, professional organizations have historically discouraged returning predictive adult-onset genetic test results and carrier status to children. Recent clinical guidance diverges from this norm, suggesting that when minors have genomic sequencing performed for clinical purposes, parents and children should have the opportunity to learn secondary findings, including for some adult-onset conditions. While parents can currently opt in or out of receiving their child’s secondary findings, the American Society of Human Genetics Workgroup on Pediatric Genetic and Genomic Testing suggests including adolescents in the decision-making process. However, it is not clear what factors young people consider when given the opportunity to learn genetic findings for themselves. We are examining adolescents’, young adults’, and parents’ (if applicable) decisions about learning genomic information for the adolescent. METHODS: We are enrolling assenting (ages 13–17) adolescents and consenting (ages 18–21) young adults in a prospective genomic screening study to assess the choices they make about receiving individual genomic results. Participants use an online tool to indicate whether they want to learn their personal genetic risk for specific preventable, treatable, and adult-onset conditions, as well as carrier status for autosomal recessive conditions. We are examining 1) how choices differ between adolescent and young adult cohorts (as well as between adolescents/young adults and parents) and 2) decisional conflict and stability across study timepoints. Results are returned based on participants’ choices. Qualitative interviews with a subset of participants explore decisional stability, adolescent/young adult engagement with parents in decision-making, and the impact of learning pathogenic/likely pathogenic and carrier results. DISCUSSION: This study explores decision making and decision stability between adolescents and parents (where applicable), as well as the ethical implications and impact of return of clinical-grade genetic research results to adolescents and young adults. The results of this study will contribute empirical evidence to support best practices and guidance on engaging young people in genetic research studies and clinical care that offer return of results. American Journal Experts 2023-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10168476/ /pubmed/37162875 http://dx.doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2819191/v1 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, so long as attribution is given to the creator. The license allows for commercial use.
spellingShingle Article
Blumling, Amy
McGowan, Michelle
Prows, Cynthia
Childers-Buschle, Kristin
Martin, Lisa
Lynch, John
Dufendach, Kevin
Lipstein, Ellen
Kovacic, Melinda Butsch
Brinkman, Bill
Myers, Melanie
Engaging Adolescents and Young Adults in Decisions About Return of Genomic Research Results: a mixed-methods longitudinal clinical trial protocol
title Engaging Adolescents and Young Adults in Decisions About Return of Genomic Research Results: a mixed-methods longitudinal clinical trial protocol
title_full Engaging Adolescents and Young Adults in Decisions About Return of Genomic Research Results: a mixed-methods longitudinal clinical trial protocol
title_fullStr Engaging Adolescents and Young Adults in Decisions About Return of Genomic Research Results: a mixed-methods longitudinal clinical trial protocol
title_full_unstemmed Engaging Adolescents and Young Adults in Decisions About Return of Genomic Research Results: a mixed-methods longitudinal clinical trial protocol
title_short Engaging Adolescents and Young Adults in Decisions About Return of Genomic Research Results: a mixed-methods longitudinal clinical trial protocol
title_sort engaging adolescents and young adults in decisions about return of genomic research results: a mixed-methods longitudinal clinical trial protocol
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10168476/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37162875
http://dx.doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2819191/v1
work_keys_str_mv AT blumlingamy engagingadolescentsandyoungadultsindecisionsaboutreturnofgenomicresearchresultsamixedmethodslongitudinalclinicaltrialprotocol
AT mcgowanmichelle engagingadolescentsandyoungadultsindecisionsaboutreturnofgenomicresearchresultsamixedmethodslongitudinalclinicaltrialprotocol
AT prowscynthia engagingadolescentsandyoungadultsindecisionsaboutreturnofgenomicresearchresultsamixedmethodslongitudinalclinicaltrialprotocol
AT childersbuschlekristin engagingadolescentsandyoungadultsindecisionsaboutreturnofgenomicresearchresultsamixedmethodslongitudinalclinicaltrialprotocol
AT martinlisa engagingadolescentsandyoungadultsindecisionsaboutreturnofgenomicresearchresultsamixedmethodslongitudinalclinicaltrialprotocol
AT lynchjohn engagingadolescentsandyoungadultsindecisionsaboutreturnofgenomicresearchresultsamixedmethodslongitudinalclinicaltrialprotocol
AT dufendachkevin engagingadolescentsandyoungadultsindecisionsaboutreturnofgenomicresearchresultsamixedmethodslongitudinalclinicaltrialprotocol
AT lipsteinellen engagingadolescentsandyoungadultsindecisionsaboutreturnofgenomicresearchresultsamixedmethodslongitudinalclinicaltrialprotocol
AT kovacicmelindabutsch engagingadolescentsandyoungadultsindecisionsaboutreturnofgenomicresearchresultsamixedmethodslongitudinalclinicaltrialprotocol
AT brinkmanbill engagingadolescentsandyoungadultsindecisionsaboutreturnofgenomicresearchresultsamixedmethodslongitudinalclinicaltrialprotocol
AT myersmelanie engagingadolescentsandyoungadultsindecisionsaboutreturnofgenomicresearchresultsamixedmethodslongitudinalclinicaltrialprotocol