Cargando…
Comparison of transformations for single-cell RNA-seq data
The count table, a numeric matrix of genes × cells, is the basic input data structure in the analysis of single-cell RNA-sequencing data. A common preprocessing step is to adjust the counts for variable sampling efficiency and to transform them so that the variance is similar across the dynamic rang...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group US
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10172138/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37037999 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41592-023-01814-1 |
_version_ | 1785039559797506048 |
---|---|
author | Ahlmann-Eltze, Constantin Huber, Wolfgang |
author_facet | Ahlmann-Eltze, Constantin Huber, Wolfgang |
author_sort | Ahlmann-Eltze, Constantin |
collection | PubMed |
description | The count table, a numeric matrix of genes × cells, is the basic input data structure in the analysis of single-cell RNA-sequencing data. A common preprocessing step is to adjust the counts for variable sampling efficiency and to transform them so that the variance is similar across the dynamic range. These steps are intended to make subsequent application of generic statistical methods more palatable. Here, we describe four transformation approaches based on the delta method, model residuals, inferred latent expression state and factor analysis. We compare their strengths and weaknesses and find that the latter three have appealing theoretical properties; however, in benchmarks using simulated and real-world data, it turns out that a rather simple approach, namely, the logarithm with a pseudo-count followed by principal-component analysis, performs as well or better than the more sophisticated alternatives. This result highlights limitations of current theoretical analysis as assessed by bottom-line performance benchmarks. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10172138 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101721382023-05-12 Comparison of transformations for single-cell RNA-seq data Ahlmann-Eltze, Constantin Huber, Wolfgang Nat Methods Analysis The count table, a numeric matrix of genes × cells, is the basic input data structure in the analysis of single-cell RNA-sequencing data. A common preprocessing step is to adjust the counts for variable sampling efficiency and to transform them so that the variance is similar across the dynamic range. These steps are intended to make subsequent application of generic statistical methods more palatable. Here, we describe four transformation approaches based on the delta method, model residuals, inferred latent expression state and factor analysis. We compare their strengths and weaknesses and find that the latter three have appealing theoretical properties; however, in benchmarks using simulated and real-world data, it turns out that a rather simple approach, namely, the logarithm with a pseudo-count followed by principal-component analysis, performs as well or better than the more sophisticated alternatives. This result highlights limitations of current theoretical analysis as assessed by bottom-line performance benchmarks. Nature Publishing Group US 2023-04-10 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10172138/ /pubmed/37037999 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41592-023-01814-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Analysis Ahlmann-Eltze, Constantin Huber, Wolfgang Comparison of transformations for single-cell RNA-seq data |
title | Comparison of transformations for single-cell RNA-seq data |
title_full | Comparison of transformations for single-cell RNA-seq data |
title_fullStr | Comparison of transformations for single-cell RNA-seq data |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of transformations for single-cell RNA-seq data |
title_short | Comparison of transformations for single-cell RNA-seq data |
title_sort | comparison of transformations for single-cell rna-seq data |
topic | Analysis |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10172138/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37037999 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41592-023-01814-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ahlmanneltzeconstantin comparisonoftransformationsforsinglecellrnaseqdata AT huberwolfgang comparisonoftransformationsforsinglecellrnaseqdata |