Cargando…

False positivity in break apart fluorescence in-situ hybridization due to polyploidy

BACKGROUND: In-situ hybridization (ISH) is a diagnostic tool in the detection of chromosomal anomalies, which has important implications for diagnosis, classification and prediction of cancer therapy in various diseases. Certain thresholds of number of cells showing an aberrant pattern are commonly...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Gulik, Anna Lena, Sluydts, Ellen, Vervoort, Liesbet, Kockx, Mark, Kortman, Pim, Ylstra, Bauke, Finn, Stephen P., Bubendorf, Lukas, Bahce, Idris, Sie, Daoud, Radonic, Teodora, Lissenberg-Witte, Birgit, Thunnissen, Erik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10183404/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37197629
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tlcr-22-516
_version_ 1785041941468020736
author van Gulik, Anna Lena
Sluydts, Ellen
Vervoort, Liesbet
Kockx, Mark
Kortman, Pim
Ylstra, Bauke
Finn, Stephen P.
Bubendorf, Lukas
Bahce, Idris
Sie, Daoud
Radonic, Teodora
Lissenberg-Witte, Birgit
Thunnissen, Erik
author_facet van Gulik, Anna Lena
Sluydts, Ellen
Vervoort, Liesbet
Kockx, Mark
Kortman, Pim
Ylstra, Bauke
Finn, Stephen P.
Bubendorf, Lukas
Bahce, Idris
Sie, Daoud
Radonic, Teodora
Lissenberg-Witte, Birgit
Thunnissen, Erik
author_sort van Gulik, Anna Lena
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In-situ hybridization (ISH) is a diagnostic tool in the detection of chromosomal anomalies, which has important implications for diagnosis, classification and prediction of cancer therapy in various diseases. Certain thresholds of number of cells showing an aberrant pattern are commonly used to declare a sample as positive for genomic rearrangements. The phenomenon of polyploidy can be misleading in the interpretation of break apart fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH). The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of cell size and ploidy on FISH results. METHODS: In sections of varying thickness of control liver tissue and non-small cell lung cancer cases, nuclear size was measured and the number of MET chromogenic ISH and ALK FISH (liver) or ALK and ROS1 FISH (lung cancer) signals was manually counted and quantified. RESULTS: In liver cell nuclei the number of FISH/chromogenic ISH signals increases with nuclear size related to physiological polyploidy and is related to section thickness. In non-small cell lung cancer cases tumour cells with higher ploidy levels and nuclear size have an increased chance of single signals. Furthermore, additional lung cancer samples with borderline ALK FISH results were examined with a commercial kit for rearrangements. No rearrangements could be demonstrated, proving a false positive ALK FISH result. CONCLUSIONS: In case of polyploidy there is an increased likelihood of false positivity when using break apart FISH probes. Therefore, we state that prescribing one single cut-off in FISH is inappropriate. In polyploidy, the currently proposed cut-off should only be used with caution and the result should be confirmed by an additional technique.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10183404
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101834042023-05-16 False positivity in break apart fluorescence in-situ hybridization due to polyploidy van Gulik, Anna Lena Sluydts, Ellen Vervoort, Liesbet Kockx, Mark Kortman, Pim Ylstra, Bauke Finn, Stephen P. Bubendorf, Lukas Bahce, Idris Sie, Daoud Radonic, Teodora Lissenberg-Witte, Birgit Thunnissen, Erik Transl Lung Cancer Res Original Article BACKGROUND: In-situ hybridization (ISH) is a diagnostic tool in the detection of chromosomal anomalies, which has important implications for diagnosis, classification and prediction of cancer therapy in various diseases. Certain thresholds of number of cells showing an aberrant pattern are commonly used to declare a sample as positive for genomic rearrangements. The phenomenon of polyploidy can be misleading in the interpretation of break apart fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH). The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of cell size and ploidy on FISH results. METHODS: In sections of varying thickness of control liver tissue and non-small cell lung cancer cases, nuclear size was measured and the number of MET chromogenic ISH and ALK FISH (liver) or ALK and ROS1 FISH (lung cancer) signals was manually counted and quantified. RESULTS: In liver cell nuclei the number of FISH/chromogenic ISH signals increases with nuclear size related to physiological polyploidy and is related to section thickness. In non-small cell lung cancer cases tumour cells with higher ploidy levels and nuclear size have an increased chance of single signals. Furthermore, additional lung cancer samples with borderline ALK FISH results were examined with a commercial kit for rearrangements. No rearrangements could be demonstrated, proving a false positive ALK FISH result. CONCLUSIONS: In case of polyploidy there is an increased likelihood of false positivity when using break apart FISH probes. Therefore, we state that prescribing one single cut-off in FISH is inappropriate. In polyploidy, the currently proposed cut-off should only be used with caution and the result should be confirmed by an additional technique. AME Publishing Company 2023-04-18 2023-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10183404/ /pubmed/37197629 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tlcr-22-516 Text en 2023 Translational Lung Cancer Research. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
van Gulik, Anna Lena
Sluydts, Ellen
Vervoort, Liesbet
Kockx, Mark
Kortman, Pim
Ylstra, Bauke
Finn, Stephen P.
Bubendorf, Lukas
Bahce, Idris
Sie, Daoud
Radonic, Teodora
Lissenberg-Witte, Birgit
Thunnissen, Erik
False positivity in break apart fluorescence in-situ hybridization due to polyploidy
title False positivity in break apart fluorescence in-situ hybridization due to polyploidy
title_full False positivity in break apart fluorescence in-situ hybridization due to polyploidy
title_fullStr False positivity in break apart fluorescence in-situ hybridization due to polyploidy
title_full_unstemmed False positivity in break apart fluorescence in-situ hybridization due to polyploidy
title_short False positivity in break apart fluorescence in-situ hybridization due to polyploidy
title_sort false positivity in break apart fluorescence in-situ hybridization due to polyploidy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10183404/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37197629
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tlcr-22-516
work_keys_str_mv AT vangulikannalena falsepositivityinbreakapartfluorescenceinsituhybridizationduetopolyploidy
AT sluydtsellen falsepositivityinbreakapartfluorescenceinsituhybridizationduetopolyploidy
AT vervoortliesbet falsepositivityinbreakapartfluorescenceinsituhybridizationduetopolyploidy
AT kockxmark falsepositivityinbreakapartfluorescenceinsituhybridizationduetopolyploidy
AT kortmanpim falsepositivityinbreakapartfluorescenceinsituhybridizationduetopolyploidy
AT ylstrabauke falsepositivityinbreakapartfluorescenceinsituhybridizationduetopolyploidy
AT finnstephenp falsepositivityinbreakapartfluorescenceinsituhybridizationduetopolyploidy
AT bubendorflukas falsepositivityinbreakapartfluorescenceinsituhybridizationduetopolyploidy
AT bahceidris falsepositivityinbreakapartfluorescenceinsituhybridizationduetopolyploidy
AT siedaoud falsepositivityinbreakapartfluorescenceinsituhybridizationduetopolyploidy
AT radonicteodora falsepositivityinbreakapartfluorescenceinsituhybridizationduetopolyploidy
AT lissenbergwittebirgit falsepositivityinbreakapartfluorescenceinsituhybridizationduetopolyploidy
AT thunnissenerik falsepositivityinbreakapartfluorescenceinsituhybridizationduetopolyploidy