Cargando…
Functionally distinct promoter classes initiate transcription via different mechanisms reflected in focused versus dispersed initiation patterns
Recruitment of RNA polymerase II (Pol II) to promoters is essential for transcription. Despite conflicting evidence, the Pol II preinitiation complex (PIC) is often thought to have a uniform composition and to assemble at all promoters via an identical mechanism. Here, using Drosophila melanogaster...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10183819/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37013908 http://dx.doi.org/10.15252/embj.2023113519 |
_version_ | 1785042037606711296 |
---|---|
author | Serebreni, Leonid Pleyer, Lisa‐Marie Haberle, Vanja Hendy, Oliver Vlasova, Anna Loubiere, Vincent Nemčko, Filip Bergauer, Katharina Roitinger, Elisabeth Mechtler, Karl Stark, Alexander |
author_facet | Serebreni, Leonid Pleyer, Lisa‐Marie Haberle, Vanja Hendy, Oliver Vlasova, Anna Loubiere, Vincent Nemčko, Filip Bergauer, Katharina Roitinger, Elisabeth Mechtler, Karl Stark, Alexander |
author_sort | Serebreni, Leonid |
collection | PubMed |
description | Recruitment of RNA polymerase II (Pol II) to promoters is essential for transcription. Despite conflicting evidence, the Pol II preinitiation complex (PIC) is often thought to have a uniform composition and to assemble at all promoters via an identical mechanism. Here, using Drosophila melanogaster S2 cells as a model, we demonstrate that different promoter classes function via distinct PICs. Promoter DNA of developmentally regulated genes readily associates with the canonical Pol II PIC, whereas housekeeping promoters do not, and instead recruit other factors such as DREF. Consistently, TBP and DREF are differentially required by distinct promoter types. TBP and its paralog TRF2 also function at different promoter types in a partially redundant manner. In contrast, TFIIA is required at all promoters, and we identify factors that can recruit and/or stabilize TFIIA at housekeeping promoters and activate transcription. Promoter activation by tethering these factors is sufficient to induce the dispersed transcription initiation patterns characteristic of housekeeping promoters. Thus, different promoter classes utilize distinct mechanisms of transcription initiation, which translate into different focused versus dispersed initiation patterns. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10183819 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101838192023-05-16 Functionally distinct promoter classes initiate transcription via different mechanisms reflected in focused versus dispersed initiation patterns Serebreni, Leonid Pleyer, Lisa‐Marie Haberle, Vanja Hendy, Oliver Vlasova, Anna Loubiere, Vincent Nemčko, Filip Bergauer, Katharina Roitinger, Elisabeth Mechtler, Karl Stark, Alexander EMBO J Articles Recruitment of RNA polymerase II (Pol II) to promoters is essential for transcription. Despite conflicting evidence, the Pol II preinitiation complex (PIC) is often thought to have a uniform composition and to assemble at all promoters via an identical mechanism. Here, using Drosophila melanogaster S2 cells as a model, we demonstrate that different promoter classes function via distinct PICs. Promoter DNA of developmentally regulated genes readily associates with the canonical Pol II PIC, whereas housekeeping promoters do not, and instead recruit other factors such as DREF. Consistently, TBP and DREF are differentially required by distinct promoter types. TBP and its paralog TRF2 also function at different promoter types in a partially redundant manner. In contrast, TFIIA is required at all promoters, and we identify factors that can recruit and/or stabilize TFIIA at housekeeping promoters and activate transcription. Promoter activation by tethering these factors is sufficient to induce the dispersed transcription initiation patterns characteristic of housekeeping promoters. Thus, different promoter classes utilize distinct mechanisms of transcription initiation, which translate into different focused versus dispersed initiation patterns. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10183819/ /pubmed/37013908 http://dx.doi.org/10.15252/embj.2023113519 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Published under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 license. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Articles Serebreni, Leonid Pleyer, Lisa‐Marie Haberle, Vanja Hendy, Oliver Vlasova, Anna Loubiere, Vincent Nemčko, Filip Bergauer, Katharina Roitinger, Elisabeth Mechtler, Karl Stark, Alexander Functionally distinct promoter classes initiate transcription via different mechanisms reflected in focused versus dispersed initiation patterns |
title | Functionally distinct promoter classes initiate transcription via different mechanisms reflected in focused versus dispersed initiation patterns |
title_full | Functionally distinct promoter classes initiate transcription via different mechanisms reflected in focused versus dispersed initiation patterns |
title_fullStr | Functionally distinct promoter classes initiate transcription via different mechanisms reflected in focused versus dispersed initiation patterns |
title_full_unstemmed | Functionally distinct promoter classes initiate transcription via different mechanisms reflected in focused versus dispersed initiation patterns |
title_short | Functionally distinct promoter classes initiate transcription via different mechanisms reflected in focused versus dispersed initiation patterns |
title_sort | functionally distinct promoter classes initiate transcription via different mechanisms reflected in focused versus dispersed initiation patterns |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10183819/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37013908 http://dx.doi.org/10.15252/embj.2023113519 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT serebrenileonid functionallydistinctpromoterclassesinitiatetranscriptionviadifferentmechanismsreflectedinfocusedversusdispersedinitiationpatterns AT pleyerlisamarie functionallydistinctpromoterclassesinitiatetranscriptionviadifferentmechanismsreflectedinfocusedversusdispersedinitiationpatterns AT haberlevanja functionallydistinctpromoterclassesinitiatetranscriptionviadifferentmechanismsreflectedinfocusedversusdispersedinitiationpatterns AT hendyoliver functionallydistinctpromoterclassesinitiatetranscriptionviadifferentmechanismsreflectedinfocusedversusdispersedinitiationpatterns AT vlasovaanna functionallydistinctpromoterclassesinitiatetranscriptionviadifferentmechanismsreflectedinfocusedversusdispersedinitiationpatterns AT loubierevincent functionallydistinctpromoterclassesinitiatetranscriptionviadifferentmechanismsreflectedinfocusedversusdispersedinitiationpatterns AT nemckofilip functionallydistinctpromoterclassesinitiatetranscriptionviadifferentmechanismsreflectedinfocusedversusdispersedinitiationpatterns AT bergauerkatharina functionallydistinctpromoterclassesinitiatetranscriptionviadifferentmechanismsreflectedinfocusedversusdispersedinitiationpatterns AT roitingerelisabeth functionallydistinctpromoterclassesinitiatetranscriptionviadifferentmechanismsreflectedinfocusedversusdispersedinitiationpatterns AT mechtlerkarl functionallydistinctpromoterclassesinitiatetranscriptionviadifferentmechanismsreflectedinfocusedversusdispersedinitiationpatterns AT starkalexander functionallydistinctpromoterclassesinitiatetranscriptionviadifferentmechanismsreflectedinfocusedversusdispersedinitiationpatterns |