Cargando…

Development and testing of a polygenic risk score for breast cancer aggressiveness

Aggressive breast cancers portend a poor prognosis, but current polygenic risk scores (PRSs) for breast cancer do not reliably predict aggressive cancers. Aggressiveness can be effectively recapitulated using tumor gene expression profiling. Thus, we sought to develop a PRS for the risk of recurrenc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shieh, Yiwey, Roger, Jacquelyn, Yau, Christina, Wolf, Denise M., Hirst, Gillian L., Swigart, Lamorna Brown, Huntsman, Scott, Hu, Donglei, Nierenberg, Jovia L., Middha, Pooja, Heise, Rachel S., Shi, Yushu, Kachuri, Linda, Zhu, Qianqian, Yao, Song, Ambrosone, Christine B., Kwan, Marilyn L., Caan, Bette J., Witte, John S., Kushi, Lawrence H., ‘T Veer, Laura van, Esserman, Laura J., Ziv, Elad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10185660/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37188791
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41698-023-00382-z
Descripción
Sumario:Aggressive breast cancers portend a poor prognosis, but current polygenic risk scores (PRSs) for breast cancer do not reliably predict aggressive cancers. Aggressiveness can be effectively recapitulated using tumor gene expression profiling. Thus, we sought to develop a PRS for the risk of recurrence score weighted on proliferation (ROR-P), an established prognostic signature. Using 2363 breast cancers with tumor gene expression data and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotypes, we examined the associations between ROR-P and known breast cancer susceptibility SNPs using linear regression models. We constructed PRSs based on varying p-value thresholds and selected the optimal PRS based on model r(2) in 5-fold cross-validation. We then used Cox proportional hazards regression to test the ROR-P PRS’s association with breast cancer-specific survival in two independent cohorts totaling 10,196 breast cancers and 785 events. In meta-analysis of these cohorts, higher ROR-P PRS was associated with worse survival, HR per SD = 1.13 (95% CI 1.06–1.21, p = 4.0 × 10(–4)). The ROR-P PRS had a similar magnitude of effect on survival as a comparator PRS for estrogen receptor (ER)-negative versus positive cancer risk (PRS(ER-/ER+))(.) Furthermore, its effect was minimally attenuated when adjusted for PRS(ER-/ER+), suggesting that the ROR-P PRS provides additional prognostic information beyond ER status. In summary, we used integrated analysis of germline SNP and tumor gene expression data to construct a PRS associated with aggressive tumor biology and worse survival. These findings could potentially enhance risk stratification for breast cancer screening and prevention.