Cargando…

Comparison of a Tobacco-Specific Carcinogen in Tobacco Cigarette, Electronic Cigarette, and Dual Users

BACKGROUND: 4-(Methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanol (NNAL) is known as a lung carcinogen. The objective of this study was to investigate associations of urine NNAL concentrations and smoking status. METHODS: This was a cross-sectionally designed study based on data from the 2016–2018 Korean Na...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Jae-woo, Kim, Sukil
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10186073/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37191844
http://dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e140
_version_ 1785042494630658048
author Lee, Jae-woo
Kim, Sukil
author_facet Lee, Jae-woo
Kim, Sukil
author_sort Lee, Jae-woo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: 4-(Methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanol (NNAL) is known as a lung carcinogen. The objective of this study was to investigate associations of urine NNAL concentrations and smoking status. METHODS: This was a cross-sectionally designed study based on data from the 2016–2018 Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. A total of 2,845 participants were classified into past-smoker, electronic cigarette (e-cigar) only, dual-user, and cigarette only smoker groups. All sampling and weight variables were stratified and analysis was conducted accounting for the complex sampling design. Analysis of covariance was used to compare the geometric mean of urine NNAL concentrations and log-transformed urine NNAL level among smoking status with weighted survey design. Post hoc paired comparisons with Bonferroni adjustment was performed according to smoking status. RESULTS: The estimated geometric mean concentrations of urine NNAL were 1.974 ± 0.091, 14.349 ± 5.218, 89.002 ± 11.444, and 117.597 ± 5.459 pg/mL in past-smoker, e-cigar only, dual-user, and cigarette only smoker groups, respectively. After fully adjusting, log-transformed urine NNAL level was significantly different among groups (P < 0.001). Compared with the past-smoker group, e-cigar only, dual-user, and cigarette only smoker groups showed significantly higher log-transformed urine NNAL concentrations in post hoc test (all P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: E-cigar only, dual-user, and cigarette only smoker groups showed significantly higher geometric mean concentrations of urine NNAL than the past-smoker group. Conventional cigarette, dual users, and e-cigar users can potentially show harmful health effects from NNAL.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10186073
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101860732023-05-17 Comparison of a Tobacco-Specific Carcinogen in Tobacco Cigarette, Electronic Cigarette, and Dual Users Lee, Jae-woo Kim, Sukil J Korean Med Sci Original Article BACKGROUND: 4-(Methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanol (NNAL) is known as a lung carcinogen. The objective of this study was to investigate associations of urine NNAL concentrations and smoking status. METHODS: This was a cross-sectionally designed study based on data from the 2016–2018 Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. A total of 2,845 participants were classified into past-smoker, electronic cigarette (e-cigar) only, dual-user, and cigarette only smoker groups. All sampling and weight variables were stratified and analysis was conducted accounting for the complex sampling design. Analysis of covariance was used to compare the geometric mean of urine NNAL concentrations and log-transformed urine NNAL level among smoking status with weighted survey design. Post hoc paired comparisons with Bonferroni adjustment was performed according to smoking status. RESULTS: The estimated geometric mean concentrations of urine NNAL were 1.974 ± 0.091, 14.349 ± 5.218, 89.002 ± 11.444, and 117.597 ± 5.459 pg/mL in past-smoker, e-cigar only, dual-user, and cigarette only smoker groups, respectively. After fully adjusting, log-transformed urine NNAL level was significantly different among groups (P < 0.001). Compared with the past-smoker group, e-cigar only, dual-user, and cigarette only smoker groups showed significantly higher log-transformed urine NNAL concentrations in post hoc test (all P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: E-cigar only, dual-user, and cigarette only smoker groups showed significantly higher geometric mean concentrations of urine NNAL than the past-smoker group. Conventional cigarette, dual users, and e-cigar users can potentially show harmful health effects from NNAL. The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences 2023-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10186073/ /pubmed/37191844 http://dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e140 Text en © 2023 The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Lee, Jae-woo
Kim, Sukil
Comparison of a Tobacco-Specific Carcinogen in Tobacco Cigarette, Electronic Cigarette, and Dual Users
title Comparison of a Tobacco-Specific Carcinogen in Tobacco Cigarette, Electronic Cigarette, and Dual Users
title_full Comparison of a Tobacco-Specific Carcinogen in Tobacco Cigarette, Electronic Cigarette, and Dual Users
title_fullStr Comparison of a Tobacco-Specific Carcinogen in Tobacco Cigarette, Electronic Cigarette, and Dual Users
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of a Tobacco-Specific Carcinogen in Tobacco Cigarette, Electronic Cigarette, and Dual Users
title_short Comparison of a Tobacco-Specific Carcinogen in Tobacco Cigarette, Electronic Cigarette, and Dual Users
title_sort comparison of a tobacco-specific carcinogen in tobacco cigarette, electronic cigarette, and dual users
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10186073/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37191844
http://dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e140
work_keys_str_mv AT leejaewoo comparisonofatobaccospecificcarcinogenintobaccocigaretteelectroniccigaretteanddualusers
AT kimsukil comparisonofatobaccospecificcarcinogenintobaccocigaretteelectroniccigaretteanddualusers