Cargando…
Scientific opinion on the tolerable upper intake level for vitamin B6
Following a request from the European Commission, the EFSA Panel on Nutrition, Novel Foods and Food Allergens (NDA) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the tolerable upper intake level (UL) for vitamin B6. Systematic reviews of the literature were conducted by a contractor. The relationship...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10189633/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37207271 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8006 |
_version_ | 1785043126573858816 |
---|---|
author | Turck, Dominique Bohn, Torsten Castenmiller, Jacqueline de Henauw, Stefaan Hirsch‐Ernst, Karen‐Ildico Knutsen, Helle Katrine Maciuk, Alexandre Mangelsdorf, Inge McArdle, Harry J Pelaez, Carmen Pentieva, Kristina Siani, Alfonso Thies, Frank Tsabouri, Sophia Vinceti, Marco Fairweather‐Tait, Susan Vrolijk, Misha Fabiani, Lucia Titz, Ariane Naska, Androniki |
author_facet | Turck, Dominique Bohn, Torsten Castenmiller, Jacqueline de Henauw, Stefaan Hirsch‐Ernst, Karen‐Ildico Knutsen, Helle Katrine Maciuk, Alexandre Mangelsdorf, Inge McArdle, Harry J Pelaez, Carmen Pentieva, Kristina Siani, Alfonso Thies, Frank Tsabouri, Sophia Vinceti, Marco Fairweather‐Tait, Susan Vrolijk, Misha Fabiani, Lucia Titz, Ariane Naska, Androniki |
collection | PubMed |
description | Following a request from the European Commission, the EFSA Panel on Nutrition, Novel Foods and Food Allergens (NDA) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the tolerable upper intake level (UL) for vitamin B6. Systematic reviews of the literature were conducted by a contractor. The relationship between excess vitamin B6 intakes and the development of peripheral neuropathy is well established and is the critical effect on which the UL is based. A lowest‐observed‐effect‐level (LOAEL) could not be established based on human data. A reference point (RP) of 50 mg/day is identified by the Panel from a case–control study, supported by data from case reports and vigilance data. An uncertainty factor (UF) of 4 is applied to the RP to account for the inverse relationship between dose and time to onset of symptoms and the limited data available. The latter covers uncertainties as to the level of intake that would represent a LOAEL. This leads to a UL of 12.5 mg/day. From a subchronic study in Beagle dogs, a LOAEL of 50 mg/kg body weight (bw) per day can be identified. Using an UF of 300, and a default bw of 70 kg, a UL of 11.7 mg/day can be calculated. From the midpoint of the range of these two ULs and rounding down, a UL of 12 mg/day is established by the Panel for vitamin B6 for adults (including pregnant and lactating women). ULs for infants and children are derived from the UL for adults using allometric scaling: 2.2–2.5 mg/day (4–11 months), 3.2–4.5 mg/day (1–6 years), 6.1–10.7 mg/day (7–17 years). Based on available intake data, EU populations are unlikely to exceed ULs, except for regular users of food supplements containing high doses of vitamin B6. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10189633 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101896332023-05-18 Scientific opinion on the tolerable upper intake level for vitamin B6 Turck, Dominique Bohn, Torsten Castenmiller, Jacqueline de Henauw, Stefaan Hirsch‐Ernst, Karen‐Ildico Knutsen, Helle Katrine Maciuk, Alexandre Mangelsdorf, Inge McArdle, Harry J Pelaez, Carmen Pentieva, Kristina Siani, Alfonso Thies, Frank Tsabouri, Sophia Vinceti, Marco Fairweather‐Tait, Susan Vrolijk, Misha Fabiani, Lucia Titz, Ariane Naska, Androniki EFSA J Scientific Opinion Following a request from the European Commission, the EFSA Panel on Nutrition, Novel Foods and Food Allergens (NDA) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the tolerable upper intake level (UL) for vitamin B6. Systematic reviews of the literature were conducted by a contractor. The relationship between excess vitamin B6 intakes and the development of peripheral neuropathy is well established and is the critical effect on which the UL is based. A lowest‐observed‐effect‐level (LOAEL) could not be established based on human data. A reference point (RP) of 50 mg/day is identified by the Panel from a case–control study, supported by data from case reports and vigilance data. An uncertainty factor (UF) of 4 is applied to the RP to account for the inverse relationship between dose and time to onset of symptoms and the limited data available. The latter covers uncertainties as to the level of intake that would represent a LOAEL. This leads to a UL of 12.5 mg/day. From a subchronic study in Beagle dogs, a LOAEL of 50 mg/kg body weight (bw) per day can be identified. Using an UF of 300, and a default bw of 70 kg, a UL of 11.7 mg/day can be calculated. From the midpoint of the range of these two ULs and rounding down, a UL of 12 mg/day is established by the Panel for vitamin B6 for adults (including pregnant and lactating women). ULs for infants and children are derived from the UL for adults using allometric scaling: 2.2–2.5 mg/day (4–11 months), 3.2–4.5 mg/day (1–6 years), 6.1–10.7 mg/day (7–17 years). Based on available intake data, EU populations are unlikely to exceed ULs, except for regular users of food supplements containing high doses of vitamin B6. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10189633/ /pubmed/37207271 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8006 Text en © 2023 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by Wiley‐VCH GmbH on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Opinion Turck, Dominique Bohn, Torsten Castenmiller, Jacqueline de Henauw, Stefaan Hirsch‐Ernst, Karen‐Ildico Knutsen, Helle Katrine Maciuk, Alexandre Mangelsdorf, Inge McArdle, Harry J Pelaez, Carmen Pentieva, Kristina Siani, Alfonso Thies, Frank Tsabouri, Sophia Vinceti, Marco Fairweather‐Tait, Susan Vrolijk, Misha Fabiani, Lucia Titz, Ariane Naska, Androniki Scientific opinion on the tolerable upper intake level for vitamin B6 |
title | Scientific opinion on the tolerable upper intake level for vitamin B6
|
title_full | Scientific opinion on the tolerable upper intake level for vitamin B6
|
title_fullStr | Scientific opinion on the tolerable upper intake level for vitamin B6
|
title_full_unstemmed | Scientific opinion on the tolerable upper intake level for vitamin B6
|
title_short | Scientific opinion on the tolerable upper intake level for vitamin B6
|
title_sort | scientific opinion on the tolerable upper intake level for vitamin b6 |
topic | Scientific Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10189633/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37207271 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8006 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT scientificopiniononthetolerableupperintakelevelforvitaminb6 AT turckdominique scientificopiniononthetolerableupperintakelevelforvitaminb6 AT bohntorsten scientificopiniononthetolerableupperintakelevelforvitaminb6 AT castenmillerjacqueline scientificopiniononthetolerableupperintakelevelforvitaminb6 AT dehenauwstefaan scientificopiniononthetolerableupperintakelevelforvitaminb6 AT hirschernstkarenildico scientificopiniononthetolerableupperintakelevelforvitaminb6 AT knutsenhellekatrine scientificopiniononthetolerableupperintakelevelforvitaminb6 AT maciukalexandre scientificopiniononthetolerableupperintakelevelforvitaminb6 AT mangelsdorfinge scientificopiniononthetolerableupperintakelevelforvitaminb6 AT mcardleharryj scientificopiniononthetolerableupperintakelevelforvitaminb6 AT pelaezcarmen scientificopiniononthetolerableupperintakelevelforvitaminb6 AT pentievakristina scientificopiniononthetolerableupperintakelevelforvitaminb6 AT sianialfonso scientificopiniononthetolerableupperintakelevelforvitaminb6 AT thiesfrank scientificopiniononthetolerableupperintakelevelforvitaminb6 AT tsabourisophia scientificopiniononthetolerableupperintakelevelforvitaminb6 AT vincetimarco scientificopiniononthetolerableupperintakelevelforvitaminb6 AT fairweathertaitsusan scientificopiniononthetolerableupperintakelevelforvitaminb6 AT vrolijkmisha scientificopiniononthetolerableupperintakelevelforvitaminb6 AT fabianilucia scientificopiniononthetolerableupperintakelevelforvitaminb6 AT titzariane scientificopiniononthetolerableupperintakelevelforvitaminb6 AT naskaandroniki scientificopiniononthetolerableupperintakelevelforvitaminb6 |