Cargando…
Challenges to acquire similar learning outcomes across four parallel thematic learning communities in a medical undergraduate curriculum
BACKGROUND: To train physicians who are able to meet the evolving requirements from health care, the University of Groningen Medical Center adopted in 2014 a new curriculum named G2020. This curriculum combines thematic learning communities with competency-based medical education and Problem-based l...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10193746/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37202782 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04341-x |
_version_ | 1785043878888341504 |
---|---|
author | Zhou, Yan Wieringa, Thomas H. Brouwer, Jasperina Diemers, Agnes D. Bos, Nicolaas A. |
author_facet | Zhou, Yan Wieringa, Thomas H. Brouwer, Jasperina Diemers, Agnes D. Bos, Nicolaas A. |
author_sort | Zhou, Yan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To train physicians who are able to meet the evolving requirements from health care, the University of Groningen Medical Center adopted in 2014 a new curriculum named G2020. This curriculum combines thematic learning communities with competency-based medical education and Problem-based learning. In the learning community program, different learning tasks were used to train general competencies. The challenge of this program was whether students acquire similar levels of learning outcomes within the different variations of the program. METHOD: We used the assessment results of three cohorts for the first two bachelor years. We used progress tests and written tests to analyze knowledge development, and the assessment results of seven competencies to analyze competence development. Concerning knowledge, we used the cumulative deviation method to compare progress tests and used the Kruskal–Wallis H test to compare written test scores between programs. Descriptive statistics are used to present all assessments of the students’ competencies. RESULTS: We observed similarly high passing rates both for competency and knowledge assessments in all programs. However, we did observe some differences. The two programs that focused more on competencies development underperformed the other two programs on knowledge assessment but outperformed on competencies assessment. CONCLUSION: This study indicates that it is possible to train students in different learning programs within one curriculum while having similar learning outcomes. There are however some differences in obtained levels between the different programs. The new curriculum still needs to improve by balancing variations in the programs and comparability of assessments across the programs. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-023-04341-x. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10193746 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101937462023-05-19 Challenges to acquire similar learning outcomes across four parallel thematic learning communities in a medical undergraduate curriculum Zhou, Yan Wieringa, Thomas H. Brouwer, Jasperina Diemers, Agnes D. Bos, Nicolaas A. BMC Med Educ Research BACKGROUND: To train physicians who are able to meet the evolving requirements from health care, the University of Groningen Medical Center adopted in 2014 a new curriculum named G2020. This curriculum combines thematic learning communities with competency-based medical education and Problem-based learning. In the learning community program, different learning tasks were used to train general competencies. The challenge of this program was whether students acquire similar levels of learning outcomes within the different variations of the program. METHOD: We used the assessment results of three cohorts for the first two bachelor years. We used progress tests and written tests to analyze knowledge development, and the assessment results of seven competencies to analyze competence development. Concerning knowledge, we used the cumulative deviation method to compare progress tests and used the Kruskal–Wallis H test to compare written test scores between programs. Descriptive statistics are used to present all assessments of the students’ competencies. RESULTS: We observed similarly high passing rates both for competency and knowledge assessments in all programs. However, we did observe some differences. The two programs that focused more on competencies development underperformed the other two programs on knowledge assessment but outperformed on competencies assessment. CONCLUSION: This study indicates that it is possible to train students in different learning programs within one curriculum while having similar learning outcomes. There are however some differences in obtained levels between the different programs. The new curriculum still needs to improve by balancing variations in the programs and comparability of assessments across the programs. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-023-04341-x. BioMed Central 2023-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10193746/ /pubmed/37202782 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04341-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Zhou, Yan Wieringa, Thomas H. Brouwer, Jasperina Diemers, Agnes D. Bos, Nicolaas A. Challenges to acquire similar learning outcomes across four parallel thematic learning communities in a medical undergraduate curriculum |
title | Challenges to acquire similar learning outcomes across four parallel thematic learning communities in a medical undergraduate curriculum |
title_full | Challenges to acquire similar learning outcomes across four parallel thematic learning communities in a medical undergraduate curriculum |
title_fullStr | Challenges to acquire similar learning outcomes across four parallel thematic learning communities in a medical undergraduate curriculum |
title_full_unstemmed | Challenges to acquire similar learning outcomes across four parallel thematic learning communities in a medical undergraduate curriculum |
title_short | Challenges to acquire similar learning outcomes across four parallel thematic learning communities in a medical undergraduate curriculum |
title_sort | challenges to acquire similar learning outcomes across four parallel thematic learning communities in a medical undergraduate curriculum |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10193746/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37202782 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04341-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhouyan challengestoacquiresimilarlearningoutcomesacrossfourparallelthematiclearningcommunitiesinamedicalundergraduatecurriculum AT wieringathomash challengestoacquiresimilarlearningoutcomesacrossfourparallelthematiclearningcommunitiesinamedicalundergraduatecurriculum AT brouwerjasperina challengestoacquiresimilarlearningoutcomesacrossfourparallelthematiclearningcommunitiesinamedicalundergraduatecurriculum AT diemersagnesd challengestoacquiresimilarlearningoutcomesacrossfourparallelthematiclearningcommunitiesinamedicalundergraduatecurriculum AT bosnicolaasa challengestoacquiresimilarlearningoutcomesacrossfourparallelthematiclearningcommunitiesinamedicalundergraduatecurriculum |