Cargando…
Comparing molecular and computational approaches for detecting viral integration of AAV gene therapy constructs
Many current gene therapy targets use recombinant adeno-associated virus (AAV). The majority of delivered AAV therapeutics persist as episomes, separate from host DNA, yet some viral DNA can integrate into host DNA in different proportions and at genomic locations. The potential for viral integratio...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Society of Gene & Cell Therapy
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10209688/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37251978 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.omtm.2023.04.009 |
_version_ | 1785046929867014144 |
---|---|
author | Oziolor, Elias M. Kumpf, Steven W. Qian, Jessie Gosink, Mark Sheehan, Mark Rubitski, David M. Newman, Leah Whiteley, Laurence O. Lanz, Thomas A. |
author_facet | Oziolor, Elias M. Kumpf, Steven W. Qian, Jessie Gosink, Mark Sheehan, Mark Rubitski, David M. Newman, Leah Whiteley, Laurence O. Lanz, Thomas A. |
author_sort | Oziolor, Elias M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Many current gene therapy targets use recombinant adeno-associated virus (AAV). The majority of delivered AAV therapeutics persist as episomes, separate from host DNA, yet some viral DNA can integrate into host DNA in different proportions and at genomic locations. The potential for viral integration leading to oncogenic transformation has led regulatory agencies to require investigation into AAV integration events following gene therapy in preclinical species. In the present study, tissues were collected from cynomolgus monkeys and mice 6 and 8 weeks, respectively, following administration of an AAV vector delivering transgene cargo. We compared three different next-generation sequencing approaches (shearing extension primer tag selection ligation-mediated PCR, targeted enrichment sequencing [TES], and whole-genome sequencing) to contrast the specificity, scope, and frequency of integration detected by each method. All three methods detected dose-dependent insertions with a limited number of hotspots and expanded clones. While the functional outcome was similar for all three methods, TES was the most cost-effective and comprehensive method of detecting viral integration. Our findings aim to inform the direction of molecular efforts to ensure a thorough hazard assessment of AAV viral integration in our preclinical gene therapy studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10209688 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | American Society of Gene & Cell Therapy |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102096882023-05-26 Comparing molecular and computational approaches for detecting viral integration of AAV gene therapy constructs Oziolor, Elias M. Kumpf, Steven W. Qian, Jessie Gosink, Mark Sheehan, Mark Rubitski, David M. Newman, Leah Whiteley, Laurence O. Lanz, Thomas A. Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev Original Article Many current gene therapy targets use recombinant adeno-associated virus (AAV). The majority of delivered AAV therapeutics persist as episomes, separate from host DNA, yet some viral DNA can integrate into host DNA in different proportions and at genomic locations. The potential for viral integration leading to oncogenic transformation has led regulatory agencies to require investigation into AAV integration events following gene therapy in preclinical species. In the present study, tissues were collected from cynomolgus monkeys and mice 6 and 8 weeks, respectively, following administration of an AAV vector delivering transgene cargo. We compared three different next-generation sequencing approaches (shearing extension primer tag selection ligation-mediated PCR, targeted enrichment sequencing [TES], and whole-genome sequencing) to contrast the specificity, scope, and frequency of integration detected by each method. All three methods detected dose-dependent insertions with a limited number of hotspots and expanded clones. While the functional outcome was similar for all three methods, TES was the most cost-effective and comprehensive method of detecting viral integration. Our findings aim to inform the direction of molecular efforts to ensure a thorough hazard assessment of AAV viral integration in our preclinical gene therapy studies. American Society of Gene & Cell Therapy 2023-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10209688/ /pubmed/37251978 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.omtm.2023.04.009 Text en © 2023 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Oziolor, Elias M. Kumpf, Steven W. Qian, Jessie Gosink, Mark Sheehan, Mark Rubitski, David M. Newman, Leah Whiteley, Laurence O. Lanz, Thomas A. Comparing molecular and computational approaches for detecting viral integration of AAV gene therapy constructs |
title | Comparing molecular and computational approaches for detecting viral integration of AAV gene therapy constructs |
title_full | Comparing molecular and computational approaches for detecting viral integration of AAV gene therapy constructs |
title_fullStr | Comparing molecular and computational approaches for detecting viral integration of AAV gene therapy constructs |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing molecular and computational approaches for detecting viral integration of AAV gene therapy constructs |
title_short | Comparing molecular and computational approaches for detecting viral integration of AAV gene therapy constructs |
title_sort | comparing molecular and computational approaches for detecting viral integration of aav gene therapy constructs |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10209688/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37251978 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.omtm.2023.04.009 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ozioloreliasm comparingmolecularandcomputationalapproachesfordetectingviralintegrationofaavgenetherapyconstructs AT kumpfstevenw comparingmolecularandcomputationalapproachesfordetectingviralintegrationofaavgenetherapyconstructs AT qianjessie comparingmolecularandcomputationalapproachesfordetectingviralintegrationofaavgenetherapyconstructs AT gosinkmark comparingmolecularandcomputationalapproachesfordetectingviralintegrationofaavgenetherapyconstructs AT sheehanmark comparingmolecularandcomputationalapproachesfordetectingviralintegrationofaavgenetherapyconstructs AT rubitskidavidm comparingmolecularandcomputationalapproachesfordetectingviralintegrationofaavgenetherapyconstructs AT newmanleah comparingmolecularandcomputationalapproachesfordetectingviralintegrationofaavgenetherapyconstructs AT whiteleylaurenceo comparingmolecularandcomputationalapproachesfordetectingviralintegrationofaavgenetherapyconstructs AT lanzthomasa comparingmolecularandcomputationalapproachesfordetectingviralintegrationofaavgenetherapyconstructs |