Cargando…

Comparing molecular and computational approaches for detecting viral integration of AAV gene therapy constructs

Many current gene therapy targets use recombinant adeno-associated virus (AAV). The majority of delivered AAV therapeutics persist as episomes, separate from host DNA, yet some viral DNA can integrate into host DNA in different proportions and at genomic locations. The potential for viral integratio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oziolor, Elias M., Kumpf, Steven W., Qian, Jessie, Gosink, Mark, Sheehan, Mark, Rubitski, David M., Newman, Leah, Whiteley, Laurence O., Lanz, Thomas A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society of Gene & Cell Therapy 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10209688/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37251978
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.omtm.2023.04.009
_version_ 1785046929867014144
author Oziolor, Elias M.
Kumpf, Steven W.
Qian, Jessie
Gosink, Mark
Sheehan, Mark
Rubitski, David M.
Newman, Leah
Whiteley, Laurence O.
Lanz, Thomas A.
author_facet Oziolor, Elias M.
Kumpf, Steven W.
Qian, Jessie
Gosink, Mark
Sheehan, Mark
Rubitski, David M.
Newman, Leah
Whiteley, Laurence O.
Lanz, Thomas A.
author_sort Oziolor, Elias M.
collection PubMed
description Many current gene therapy targets use recombinant adeno-associated virus (AAV). The majority of delivered AAV therapeutics persist as episomes, separate from host DNA, yet some viral DNA can integrate into host DNA in different proportions and at genomic locations. The potential for viral integration leading to oncogenic transformation has led regulatory agencies to require investigation into AAV integration events following gene therapy in preclinical species. In the present study, tissues were collected from cynomolgus monkeys and mice 6 and 8 weeks, respectively, following administration of an AAV vector delivering transgene cargo. We compared three different next-generation sequencing approaches (shearing extension primer tag selection ligation-mediated PCR, targeted enrichment sequencing [TES], and whole-genome sequencing) to contrast the specificity, scope, and frequency of integration detected by each method. All three methods detected dose-dependent insertions with a limited number of hotspots and expanded clones. While the functional outcome was similar for all three methods, TES was the most cost-effective and comprehensive method of detecting viral integration. Our findings aim to inform the direction of molecular efforts to ensure a thorough hazard assessment of AAV viral integration in our preclinical gene therapy studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10209688
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher American Society of Gene & Cell Therapy
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102096882023-05-26 Comparing molecular and computational approaches for detecting viral integration of AAV gene therapy constructs Oziolor, Elias M. Kumpf, Steven W. Qian, Jessie Gosink, Mark Sheehan, Mark Rubitski, David M. Newman, Leah Whiteley, Laurence O. Lanz, Thomas A. Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev Original Article Many current gene therapy targets use recombinant adeno-associated virus (AAV). The majority of delivered AAV therapeutics persist as episomes, separate from host DNA, yet some viral DNA can integrate into host DNA in different proportions and at genomic locations. The potential for viral integration leading to oncogenic transformation has led regulatory agencies to require investigation into AAV integration events following gene therapy in preclinical species. In the present study, tissues were collected from cynomolgus monkeys and mice 6 and 8 weeks, respectively, following administration of an AAV vector delivering transgene cargo. We compared three different next-generation sequencing approaches (shearing extension primer tag selection ligation-mediated PCR, targeted enrichment sequencing [TES], and whole-genome sequencing) to contrast the specificity, scope, and frequency of integration detected by each method. All three methods detected dose-dependent insertions with a limited number of hotspots and expanded clones. While the functional outcome was similar for all three methods, TES was the most cost-effective and comprehensive method of detecting viral integration. Our findings aim to inform the direction of molecular efforts to ensure a thorough hazard assessment of AAV viral integration in our preclinical gene therapy studies. American Society of Gene & Cell Therapy 2023-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10209688/ /pubmed/37251978 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.omtm.2023.04.009 Text en © 2023 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Oziolor, Elias M.
Kumpf, Steven W.
Qian, Jessie
Gosink, Mark
Sheehan, Mark
Rubitski, David M.
Newman, Leah
Whiteley, Laurence O.
Lanz, Thomas A.
Comparing molecular and computational approaches for detecting viral integration of AAV gene therapy constructs
title Comparing molecular and computational approaches for detecting viral integration of AAV gene therapy constructs
title_full Comparing molecular and computational approaches for detecting viral integration of AAV gene therapy constructs
title_fullStr Comparing molecular and computational approaches for detecting viral integration of AAV gene therapy constructs
title_full_unstemmed Comparing molecular and computational approaches for detecting viral integration of AAV gene therapy constructs
title_short Comparing molecular and computational approaches for detecting viral integration of AAV gene therapy constructs
title_sort comparing molecular and computational approaches for detecting viral integration of aav gene therapy constructs
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10209688/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37251978
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.omtm.2023.04.009
work_keys_str_mv AT ozioloreliasm comparingmolecularandcomputationalapproachesfordetectingviralintegrationofaavgenetherapyconstructs
AT kumpfstevenw comparingmolecularandcomputationalapproachesfordetectingviralintegrationofaavgenetherapyconstructs
AT qianjessie comparingmolecularandcomputationalapproachesfordetectingviralintegrationofaavgenetherapyconstructs
AT gosinkmark comparingmolecularandcomputationalapproachesfordetectingviralintegrationofaavgenetherapyconstructs
AT sheehanmark comparingmolecularandcomputationalapproachesfordetectingviralintegrationofaavgenetherapyconstructs
AT rubitskidavidm comparingmolecularandcomputationalapproachesfordetectingviralintegrationofaavgenetherapyconstructs
AT newmanleah comparingmolecularandcomputationalapproachesfordetectingviralintegrationofaavgenetherapyconstructs
AT whiteleylaurenceo comparingmolecularandcomputationalapproachesfordetectingviralintegrationofaavgenetherapyconstructs
AT lanzthomasa comparingmolecularandcomputationalapproachesfordetectingviralintegrationofaavgenetherapyconstructs