Cargando…

Relative Change in Donor-Derived Cell-free DNA is Superior to Absolute Values for Diagnosis of Acute Lung Allograft Dysfunction

Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA%) is a biomarker of early acute lung allograft dysfunction (ALAD), with a value of ≥1.0% indicating injury. Whether dd-cfDNA% is a useful biomarker in patients >2 y posttransplant is unknown. Our group previously demonstrated that median dd-cfDNA% in lung rec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Trindade, Anil J., Chapin, Kaitlyn C., Gray, Jennifer N., Furuya, Yuka, Mullican, Amy, Hoy, Haley, Demarest, Caitlin T., Robbins, Ivan M., Bacchetta, Matthew, Erasmus, David B., Shaver, Ciara M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10212612/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37250487
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/TXD.0000000000001487
_version_ 1785047454287134720
author Trindade, Anil J.
Chapin, Kaitlyn C.
Gray, Jennifer N.
Furuya, Yuka
Mullican, Amy
Hoy, Haley
Demarest, Caitlin T.
Robbins, Ivan M.
Bacchetta, Matthew
Erasmus, David B.
Shaver, Ciara M.
author_facet Trindade, Anil J.
Chapin, Kaitlyn C.
Gray, Jennifer N.
Furuya, Yuka
Mullican, Amy
Hoy, Haley
Demarest, Caitlin T.
Robbins, Ivan M.
Bacchetta, Matthew
Erasmus, David B.
Shaver, Ciara M.
author_sort Trindade, Anil J.
collection PubMed
description Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA%) is a biomarker of early acute lung allograft dysfunction (ALAD), with a value of ≥1.0% indicating injury. Whether dd-cfDNA% is a useful biomarker in patients >2 y posttransplant is unknown. Our group previously demonstrated that median dd-cfDNA% in lung recipients ≥2 y posttransplant without ALAD was 0.45%. In that cohort, biologic variability of dd-cfDNA% was estimated by a reference change value (RCV) of 73%, suggesting that change exceeding 73% may be pathologic. In this study, we aimed to determine whether dd-cfDNA% variability or absolute thresholds are optimal for detecting ALAD. METHODS. We prospectively measured plasma dd-cfDNA% every 3 to 4 mo in patients ≥2 y post–lung transplant. ALAD was defined as infection, acute cellular rejection, possible antibody-mediated rejection, or change in forced expiratory volume in 1 s >10%, and was adjudicated retrospectively. We analyzed area under the curve for RCV and absolute dd-cfDNA% and reported performance of RCV ≥73% versus absolute value >1% for discriminating ALAD. RESULTS. Seventy-one patients had ≥2 baseline measurements of dd-cfDNA%; 30 developed ALAD. RCV of dd-cfDNA% at ALAD had a greater area under the receiver operator characteristic curve than absolute dd-cfDNA% values (0.87 versus 0.69, P = 0.018). Test characteristics of RCV >73% for ALAD diagnosis were sensitivity 87%, specificity 78%, positive predictive value 74%, and negative predictive value 89%. In contrast, dd-cfDNA% ≥1% had sensitivity 50%, specificity 78%, positive predictive value 63%, and negative predictive value 68%. CONCLUSIONS. Relative change in dd-cfDNA% has improved test characteristics for diagnosing ALAD compared with absolute values.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10212612
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102126122023-05-26 Relative Change in Donor-Derived Cell-free DNA is Superior to Absolute Values for Diagnosis of Acute Lung Allograft Dysfunction Trindade, Anil J. Chapin, Kaitlyn C. Gray, Jennifer N. Furuya, Yuka Mullican, Amy Hoy, Haley Demarest, Caitlin T. Robbins, Ivan M. Bacchetta, Matthew Erasmus, David B. Shaver, Ciara M. Transplant Direct Lung Transplantation Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA%) is a biomarker of early acute lung allograft dysfunction (ALAD), with a value of ≥1.0% indicating injury. Whether dd-cfDNA% is a useful biomarker in patients >2 y posttransplant is unknown. Our group previously demonstrated that median dd-cfDNA% in lung recipients ≥2 y posttransplant without ALAD was 0.45%. In that cohort, biologic variability of dd-cfDNA% was estimated by a reference change value (RCV) of 73%, suggesting that change exceeding 73% may be pathologic. In this study, we aimed to determine whether dd-cfDNA% variability or absolute thresholds are optimal for detecting ALAD. METHODS. We prospectively measured plasma dd-cfDNA% every 3 to 4 mo in patients ≥2 y post–lung transplant. ALAD was defined as infection, acute cellular rejection, possible antibody-mediated rejection, or change in forced expiratory volume in 1 s >10%, and was adjudicated retrospectively. We analyzed area under the curve for RCV and absolute dd-cfDNA% and reported performance of RCV ≥73% versus absolute value >1% for discriminating ALAD. RESULTS. Seventy-one patients had ≥2 baseline measurements of dd-cfDNA%; 30 developed ALAD. RCV of dd-cfDNA% at ALAD had a greater area under the receiver operator characteristic curve than absolute dd-cfDNA% values (0.87 versus 0.69, P = 0.018). Test characteristics of RCV >73% for ALAD diagnosis were sensitivity 87%, specificity 78%, positive predictive value 74%, and negative predictive value 89%. In contrast, dd-cfDNA% ≥1% had sensitivity 50%, specificity 78%, positive predictive value 63%, and negative predictive value 68%. CONCLUSIONS. Relative change in dd-cfDNA% has improved test characteristics for diagnosing ALAD compared with absolute values. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10212612/ /pubmed/37250487 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/TXD.0000000000001487 Text en Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Transplantation Direct. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Lung Transplantation
Trindade, Anil J.
Chapin, Kaitlyn C.
Gray, Jennifer N.
Furuya, Yuka
Mullican, Amy
Hoy, Haley
Demarest, Caitlin T.
Robbins, Ivan M.
Bacchetta, Matthew
Erasmus, David B.
Shaver, Ciara M.
Relative Change in Donor-Derived Cell-free DNA is Superior to Absolute Values for Diagnosis of Acute Lung Allograft Dysfunction
title Relative Change in Donor-Derived Cell-free DNA is Superior to Absolute Values for Diagnosis of Acute Lung Allograft Dysfunction
title_full Relative Change in Donor-Derived Cell-free DNA is Superior to Absolute Values for Diagnosis of Acute Lung Allograft Dysfunction
title_fullStr Relative Change in Donor-Derived Cell-free DNA is Superior to Absolute Values for Diagnosis of Acute Lung Allograft Dysfunction
title_full_unstemmed Relative Change in Donor-Derived Cell-free DNA is Superior to Absolute Values for Diagnosis of Acute Lung Allograft Dysfunction
title_short Relative Change in Donor-Derived Cell-free DNA is Superior to Absolute Values for Diagnosis of Acute Lung Allograft Dysfunction
title_sort relative change in donor-derived cell-free dna is superior to absolute values for diagnosis of acute lung allograft dysfunction
topic Lung Transplantation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10212612/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37250487
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/TXD.0000000000001487
work_keys_str_mv AT trindadeanilj relativechangeindonorderivedcellfreednaissuperiortoabsolutevaluesfordiagnosisofacutelungallograftdysfunction
AT chapinkaitlync relativechangeindonorderivedcellfreednaissuperiortoabsolutevaluesfordiagnosisofacutelungallograftdysfunction
AT grayjennifern relativechangeindonorderivedcellfreednaissuperiortoabsolutevaluesfordiagnosisofacutelungallograftdysfunction
AT furuyayuka relativechangeindonorderivedcellfreednaissuperiortoabsolutevaluesfordiagnosisofacutelungallograftdysfunction
AT mullicanamy relativechangeindonorderivedcellfreednaissuperiortoabsolutevaluesfordiagnosisofacutelungallograftdysfunction
AT hoyhaley relativechangeindonorderivedcellfreednaissuperiortoabsolutevaluesfordiagnosisofacutelungallograftdysfunction
AT demarestcaitlint relativechangeindonorderivedcellfreednaissuperiortoabsolutevaluesfordiagnosisofacutelungallograftdysfunction
AT robbinsivanm relativechangeindonorderivedcellfreednaissuperiortoabsolutevaluesfordiagnosisofacutelungallograftdysfunction
AT bacchettamatthew relativechangeindonorderivedcellfreednaissuperiortoabsolutevaluesfordiagnosisofacutelungallograftdysfunction
AT erasmusdavidb relativechangeindonorderivedcellfreednaissuperiortoabsolutevaluesfordiagnosisofacutelungallograftdysfunction
AT shaverciaram relativechangeindonorderivedcellfreednaissuperiortoabsolutevaluesfordiagnosisofacutelungallograftdysfunction