Cargando…

A gene-level test for directional selection on gene expression

Most variants identified in human genome-wide association studies and scans for selection are noncoding. Interpretation of their effects and the way in which they contribute to phenotypic variation and adaptation in human populations is therefore limited by our understanding of gene regulation and t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Colbran, Laura L, Ramos-Almodovar, Fabian C, Mathieson, Iain
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10213495/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37036411
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/genetics/iyad060
_version_ 1785047632634183680
author Colbran, Laura L
Ramos-Almodovar, Fabian C
Mathieson, Iain
author_facet Colbran, Laura L
Ramos-Almodovar, Fabian C
Mathieson, Iain
author_sort Colbran, Laura L
collection PubMed
description Most variants identified in human genome-wide association studies and scans for selection are noncoding. Interpretation of their effects and the way in which they contribute to phenotypic variation and adaptation in human populations is therefore limited by our understanding of gene regulation and the difficulty of confidently linking noncoding variants to genes. To overcome this, we developed a gene-wise test for population-specific selection based on combinations of regulatory variants. Specifically, we use the [Formula: see text] statistic to test for polygenic selection on cis-regulatory variants based on whether the variance across populations in the predicted expression of a particular gene is higher than expected under neutrality. We then applied this approach to human data, testing for selection on 17,388 protein-coding genes in 26 populations from the Thousand Genomes Project. We identified 45 genes with significant evidence ([Formula: see text]) for selection, including FADS1, KHK, SULT1A2, ITGAM, and several genes in the HLA region. We further confirm that these signals correspond to plausible population-level differences in predicted expression. While the small number of significant genes (0.2%) is consistent with most cis-regulatory variation evolving under genetic drift or stabilizing selection, it remains possible that there are effects not captured in this study. Our gene-level [Formula: see text] score is independent of standard genomic tests for selection, and may therefore be useful in combination with traditional selection scans to specifically identify selection on regulatory variation. Overall, our results demonstrate the utility of combining population-level genomic data with functional data to understand the evolution of gene expression.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10213495
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102134952023-05-27 A gene-level test for directional selection on gene expression Colbran, Laura L Ramos-Almodovar, Fabian C Mathieson, Iain Genetics Investigation Most variants identified in human genome-wide association studies and scans for selection are noncoding. Interpretation of their effects and the way in which they contribute to phenotypic variation and adaptation in human populations is therefore limited by our understanding of gene regulation and the difficulty of confidently linking noncoding variants to genes. To overcome this, we developed a gene-wise test for population-specific selection based on combinations of regulatory variants. Specifically, we use the [Formula: see text] statistic to test for polygenic selection on cis-regulatory variants based on whether the variance across populations in the predicted expression of a particular gene is higher than expected under neutrality. We then applied this approach to human data, testing for selection on 17,388 protein-coding genes in 26 populations from the Thousand Genomes Project. We identified 45 genes with significant evidence ([Formula: see text]) for selection, including FADS1, KHK, SULT1A2, ITGAM, and several genes in the HLA region. We further confirm that these signals correspond to plausible population-level differences in predicted expression. While the small number of significant genes (0.2%) is consistent with most cis-regulatory variation evolving under genetic drift or stabilizing selection, it remains possible that there are effects not captured in this study. Our gene-level [Formula: see text] score is independent of standard genomic tests for selection, and may therefore be useful in combination with traditional selection scans to specifically identify selection on regulatory variation. Overall, our results demonstrate the utility of combining population-level genomic data with functional data to understand the evolution of gene expression. Oxford University Press 2023-04-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10213495/ /pubmed/37036411 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/genetics/iyad060 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Genetics Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Investigation
Colbran, Laura L
Ramos-Almodovar, Fabian C
Mathieson, Iain
A gene-level test for directional selection on gene expression
title A gene-level test for directional selection on gene expression
title_full A gene-level test for directional selection on gene expression
title_fullStr A gene-level test for directional selection on gene expression
title_full_unstemmed A gene-level test for directional selection on gene expression
title_short A gene-level test for directional selection on gene expression
title_sort gene-level test for directional selection on gene expression
topic Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10213495/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37036411
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/genetics/iyad060
work_keys_str_mv AT colbranlaural ageneleveltestfordirectionalselectionongeneexpression
AT ramosalmodovarfabianc ageneleveltestfordirectionalselectionongeneexpression
AT mathiesoniain ageneleveltestfordirectionalselectionongeneexpression
AT colbranlaural geneleveltestfordirectionalselectionongeneexpression
AT ramosalmodovarfabianc geneleveltestfordirectionalselectionongeneexpression
AT mathiesoniain geneleveltestfordirectionalselectionongeneexpression