Cargando…
The effect of performance pressure and error-feedback on anxiety and performance in an interceptive task
INTRODUCTION: Whilst the disruptive effects of anxiety on attention and performance have been well documented, the antecedents to anxiety in motivated performance scenarios are less well understood. We therefore sought to understand the cognitive appraisals that mediate the relationship between pres...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10215563/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37251048 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1182269 |
_version_ | 1785048093125771264 |
---|---|
author | Harris, David John Arthur, Tom Vine, Samuel James Rahman, Harith Rusydin Abd Liu, Jiayi Han, Feng Wilson, Mark R. |
author_facet | Harris, David John Arthur, Tom Vine, Samuel James Rahman, Harith Rusydin Abd Liu, Jiayi Han, Feng Wilson, Mark R. |
author_sort | Harris, David John |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Whilst the disruptive effects of anxiety on attention and performance have been well documented, the antecedents to anxiety in motivated performance scenarios are less well understood. We therefore sought to understand the cognitive appraisals that mediate the relationship between pressurised performance situations and the onset of anxiety. METHODS: We tested the effects of performance pressure and error feedback on appraisals of the probability and cost of failure, the experience of anxiety, and subsequent impacts on visual attention, movement kinematics, and task performance during a virtual reality interception task. RESULTS: A series of linear mixed effects models indicated that failure feedback and situational pressure influenced appraisals of the probability and cost of failure, which subsequently predicted the onset of anxious states. We did not, however, observe downstream effects on performance and attention. DISCUSSION: The findings support the predictions of Attentional Control Theory Sport, that (i) momentary errors lead to negative appraisals of the probability of future failure; and (ii) that appraisals of both the cost and probability of future failure are important predictors of anxiety. The results contribute to a better understanding of the precursors to anxiety and the feedback loops that may maintain anxious states. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10215563 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102155632023-05-27 The effect of performance pressure and error-feedback on anxiety and performance in an interceptive task Harris, David John Arthur, Tom Vine, Samuel James Rahman, Harith Rusydin Abd Liu, Jiayi Han, Feng Wilson, Mark R. Front Psychol Psychology INTRODUCTION: Whilst the disruptive effects of anxiety on attention and performance have been well documented, the antecedents to anxiety in motivated performance scenarios are less well understood. We therefore sought to understand the cognitive appraisals that mediate the relationship between pressurised performance situations and the onset of anxiety. METHODS: We tested the effects of performance pressure and error feedback on appraisals of the probability and cost of failure, the experience of anxiety, and subsequent impacts on visual attention, movement kinematics, and task performance during a virtual reality interception task. RESULTS: A series of linear mixed effects models indicated that failure feedback and situational pressure influenced appraisals of the probability and cost of failure, which subsequently predicted the onset of anxious states. We did not, however, observe downstream effects on performance and attention. DISCUSSION: The findings support the predictions of Attentional Control Theory Sport, that (i) momentary errors lead to negative appraisals of the probability of future failure; and (ii) that appraisals of both the cost and probability of future failure are important predictors of anxiety. The results contribute to a better understanding of the precursors to anxiety and the feedback loops that may maintain anxious states. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10215563/ /pubmed/37251048 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1182269 Text en Copyright © 2023 Harris, Arthur, Vine, Rahman, Liu, Han and Wilson. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Harris, David John Arthur, Tom Vine, Samuel James Rahman, Harith Rusydin Abd Liu, Jiayi Han, Feng Wilson, Mark R. The effect of performance pressure and error-feedback on anxiety and performance in an interceptive task |
title | The effect of performance pressure and error-feedback on anxiety and performance in an interceptive task |
title_full | The effect of performance pressure and error-feedback on anxiety and performance in an interceptive task |
title_fullStr | The effect of performance pressure and error-feedback on anxiety and performance in an interceptive task |
title_full_unstemmed | The effect of performance pressure and error-feedback on anxiety and performance in an interceptive task |
title_short | The effect of performance pressure and error-feedback on anxiety and performance in an interceptive task |
title_sort | effect of performance pressure and error-feedback on anxiety and performance in an interceptive task |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10215563/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37251048 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1182269 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT harrisdavidjohn theeffectofperformancepressureanderrorfeedbackonanxietyandperformanceinaninterceptivetask AT arthurtom theeffectofperformancepressureanderrorfeedbackonanxietyandperformanceinaninterceptivetask AT vinesamueljames theeffectofperformancepressureanderrorfeedbackonanxietyandperformanceinaninterceptivetask AT rahmanharithrusydinabd theeffectofperformancepressureanderrorfeedbackonanxietyandperformanceinaninterceptivetask AT liujiayi theeffectofperformancepressureanderrorfeedbackonanxietyandperformanceinaninterceptivetask AT hanfeng theeffectofperformancepressureanderrorfeedbackonanxietyandperformanceinaninterceptivetask AT wilsonmarkr theeffectofperformancepressureanderrorfeedbackonanxietyandperformanceinaninterceptivetask AT harrisdavidjohn effectofperformancepressureanderrorfeedbackonanxietyandperformanceinaninterceptivetask AT arthurtom effectofperformancepressureanderrorfeedbackonanxietyandperformanceinaninterceptivetask AT vinesamueljames effectofperformancepressureanderrorfeedbackonanxietyandperformanceinaninterceptivetask AT rahmanharithrusydinabd effectofperformancepressureanderrorfeedbackonanxietyandperformanceinaninterceptivetask AT liujiayi effectofperformancepressureanderrorfeedbackonanxietyandperformanceinaninterceptivetask AT hanfeng effectofperformancepressureanderrorfeedbackonanxietyandperformanceinaninterceptivetask AT wilsonmarkr effectofperformancepressureanderrorfeedbackonanxietyandperformanceinaninterceptivetask |