Cargando…

The effect of performance pressure and error-feedback on anxiety and performance in an interceptive task

INTRODUCTION: Whilst the disruptive effects of anxiety on attention and performance have been well documented, the antecedents to anxiety in motivated performance scenarios are less well understood. We therefore sought to understand the cognitive appraisals that mediate the relationship between pres...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harris, David John, Arthur, Tom, Vine, Samuel James, Rahman, Harith Rusydin Abd, Liu, Jiayi, Han, Feng, Wilson, Mark R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10215563/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37251048
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1182269
_version_ 1785048093125771264
author Harris, David John
Arthur, Tom
Vine, Samuel James
Rahman, Harith Rusydin Abd
Liu, Jiayi
Han, Feng
Wilson, Mark R.
author_facet Harris, David John
Arthur, Tom
Vine, Samuel James
Rahman, Harith Rusydin Abd
Liu, Jiayi
Han, Feng
Wilson, Mark R.
author_sort Harris, David John
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Whilst the disruptive effects of anxiety on attention and performance have been well documented, the antecedents to anxiety in motivated performance scenarios are less well understood. We therefore sought to understand the cognitive appraisals that mediate the relationship between pressurised performance situations and the onset of anxiety. METHODS: We tested the effects of performance pressure and error feedback on appraisals of the probability and cost of failure, the experience of anxiety, and subsequent impacts on visual attention, movement kinematics, and task performance during a virtual reality interception task. RESULTS: A series of linear mixed effects models indicated that failure feedback and situational pressure influenced appraisals of the probability and cost of failure, which subsequently predicted the onset of anxious states. We did not, however, observe downstream effects on performance and attention. DISCUSSION: The findings support the predictions of Attentional Control Theory Sport, that (i) momentary errors lead to negative appraisals of the probability of future failure; and (ii) that appraisals of both the cost and probability of future failure are important predictors of anxiety. The results contribute to a better understanding of the precursors to anxiety and the feedback loops that may maintain anxious states.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10215563
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102155632023-05-27 The effect of performance pressure and error-feedback on anxiety and performance in an interceptive task Harris, David John Arthur, Tom Vine, Samuel James Rahman, Harith Rusydin Abd Liu, Jiayi Han, Feng Wilson, Mark R. Front Psychol Psychology INTRODUCTION: Whilst the disruptive effects of anxiety on attention and performance have been well documented, the antecedents to anxiety in motivated performance scenarios are less well understood. We therefore sought to understand the cognitive appraisals that mediate the relationship between pressurised performance situations and the onset of anxiety. METHODS: We tested the effects of performance pressure and error feedback on appraisals of the probability and cost of failure, the experience of anxiety, and subsequent impacts on visual attention, movement kinematics, and task performance during a virtual reality interception task. RESULTS: A series of linear mixed effects models indicated that failure feedback and situational pressure influenced appraisals of the probability and cost of failure, which subsequently predicted the onset of anxious states. We did not, however, observe downstream effects on performance and attention. DISCUSSION: The findings support the predictions of Attentional Control Theory Sport, that (i) momentary errors lead to negative appraisals of the probability of future failure; and (ii) that appraisals of both the cost and probability of future failure are important predictors of anxiety. The results contribute to a better understanding of the precursors to anxiety and the feedback loops that may maintain anxious states. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10215563/ /pubmed/37251048 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1182269 Text en Copyright © 2023 Harris, Arthur, Vine, Rahman, Liu, Han and Wilson. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Harris, David John
Arthur, Tom
Vine, Samuel James
Rahman, Harith Rusydin Abd
Liu, Jiayi
Han, Feng
Wilson, Mark R.
The effect of performance pressure and error-feedback on anxiety and performance in an interceptive task
title The effect of performance pressure and error-feedback on anxiety and performance in an interceptive task
title_full The effect of performance pressure and error-feedback on anxiety and performance in an interceptive task
title_fullStr The effect of performance pressure and error-feedback on anxiety and performance in an interceptive task
title_full_unstemmed The effect of performance pressure and error-feedback on anxiety and performance in an interceptive task
title_short The effect of performance pressure and error-feedback on anxiety and performance in an interceptive task
title_sort effect of performance pressure and error-feedback on anxiety and performance in an interceptive task
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10215563/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37251048
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1182269
work_keys_str_mv AT harrisdavidjohn theeffectofperformancepressureanderrorfeedbackonanxietyandperformanceinaninterceptivetask
AT arthurtom theeffectofperformancepressureanderrorfeedbackonanxietyandperformanceinaninterceptivetask
AT vinesamueljames theeffectofperformancepressureanderrorfeedbackonanxietyandperformanceinaninterceptivetask
AT rahmanharithrusydinabd theeffectofperformancepressureanderrorfeedbackonanxietyandperformanceinaninterceptivetask
AT liujiayi theeffectofperformancepressureanderrorfeedbackonanxietyandperformanceinaninterceptivetask
AT hanfeng theeffectofperformancepressureanderrorfeedbackonanxietyandperformanceinaninterceptivetask
AT wilsonmarkr theeffectofperformancepressureanderrorfeedbackonanxietyandperformanceinaninterceptivetask
AT harrisdavidjohn effectofperformancepressureanderrorfeedbackonanxietyandperformanceinaninterceptivetask
AT arthurtom effectofperformancepressureanderrorfeedbackonanxietyandperformanceinaninterceptivetask
AT vinesamueljames effectofperformancepressureanderrorfeedbackonanxietyandperformanceinaninterceptivetask
AT rahmanharithrusydinabd effectofperformancepressureanderrorfeedbackonanxietyandperformanceinaninterceptivetask
AT liujiayi effectofperformancepressureanderrorfeedbackonanxietyandperformanceinaninterceptivetask
AT hanfeng effectofperformancepressureanderrorfeedbackonanxietyandperformanceinaninterceptivetask
AT wilsonmarkr effectofperformancepressureanderrorfeedbackonanxietyandperformanceinaninterceptivetask