Cargando…

Quantifying Intratumoral Heterogeneity and Immunoarchitecture Generated In-Silico by a Spatial Quantitative Systems Pharmacology Model

SIMPLE SUMMARY: We introduced a novel approach to quantitatively validate the performance of a hybrid spatio-temporal method called spatial quantitative systems pharmacology (spQSP). This platform is composed of a compartmental QSP model describing tumor growth dynamics, anti-tumor immune response a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nikfar, Mehdi, Mi, Haoyang, Gong, Chang, Kimko, Holly, Popel, Aleksander S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10216176/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37345087
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15102750
_version_ 1785048235570626560
author Nikfar, Mehdi
Mi, Haoyang
Gong, Chang
Kimko, Holly
Popel, Aleksander S.
author_facet Nikfar, Mehdi
Mi, Haoyang
Gong, Chang
Kimko, Holly
Popel, Aleksander S.
author_sort Nikfar, Mehdi
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: We introduced a novel approach to quantitatively validate the performance of a hybrid spatio-temporal method called spatial quantitative systems pharmacology (spQSP). This platform is composed of a compartmental QSP model describing tumor growth dynamics, anti-tumor immune response and immune checkpoint therapy in a whole-patient and a spatial agent-based model, describing the tumor to simulate the effect of anti-PD-1 therapy (an immune checkpoint inhibitor) on simulated intratumoral heterogeneity. Four spatial metrics adopted from computational digital pathology, along with the ratio of cancer cells to immune cells, were used to categorize the tumor microenvironment as “cold”, “mixed” and “compartmentalized” patterns, which were related to the efficacy of the treatment. This study compared the intratumoral heterogeneity description capability of the metrics to facilitate future comprehensive and tangible research on specific cancer types, different therapeutics as single agents or combination therapies, and immunopathological multiplexed samples. Having a better quantitative understanding of intratumoral heterogeneity using numerical simulations can help design more effective treatments. ABSTRACT: Spatial heterogeneity is a hallmark of cancer. Tumor heterogeneity can vary with time and location. The tumor microenvironment (TME) encompasses various cell types and their interactions that impart response to therapies. Therefore, a quantitative evaluation of tumor heterogeneity is crucial for the development of effective treatments. Different approaches, such as multiregional sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, analysis of autopsy samples, and longitudinal analysis of biopsy samples, can be used to analyze the intratumoral heterogeneity (ITH) and temporal evolution and to reveal the mechanisms of therapeutic response. However, because of the limitations of these data and the uncertainty associated with the time points of sample collection, having a complete understanding of intratumoral heterogeneity role is challenging. Here, we used a hybrid model that integrates a whole-patient compartmental quantitative-systems-pharmacology (QSP) model with a spatial agent-based model (ABM) describing the TME; we applied four spatial metrics to quantify model-simulated intratumoral heterogeneity and classified the TME immunoarchitecture for representative cases of effective and ineffective anti-PD-1 therapy. The four metrics, adopted from computational digital pathology, included mixing score, average neighbor frequency, Shannon’s entropy and area under the curve (AUC) of the G-cross function. A fifth non-spatial metric was used to supplement the analysis, which was the ratio of the number of cancer cells to immune cells. These metrics were utilized to classify the TME as “cold”, “compartmentalized” and “mixed”, which were related to treatment efficacy. The trends in these metrics for effective and ineffective treatments are in qualitative agreement with the clinical literature, indicating that compartmentalized immunoarchitecture is likely to result in more efficacious treatment outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10216176
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102161762023-05-27 Quantifying Intratumoral Heterogeneity and Immunoarchitecture Generated In-Silico by a Spatial Quantitative Systems Pharmacology Model Nikfar, Mehdi Mi, Haoyang Gong, Chang Kimko, Holly Popel, Aleksander S. Cancers (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: We introduced a novel approach to quantitatively validate the performance of a hybrid spatio-temporal method called spatial quantitative systems pharmacology (spQSP). This platform is composed of a compartmental QSP model describing tumor growth dynamics, anti-tumor immune response and immune checkpoint therapy in a whole-patient and a spatial agent-based model, describing the tumor to simulate the effect of anti-PD-1 therapy (an immune checkpoint inhibitor) on simulated intratumoral heterogeneity. Four spatial metrics adopted from computational digital pathology, along with the ratio of cancer cells to immune cells, were used to categorize the tumor microenvironment as “cold”, “mixed” and “compartmentalized” patterns, which were related to the efficacy of the treatment. This study compared the intratumoral heterogeneity description capability of the metrics to facilitate future comprehensive and tangible research on specific cancer types, different therapeutics as single agents or combination therapies, and immunopathological multiplexed samples. Having a better quantitative understanding of intratumoral heterogeneity using numerical simulations can help design more effective treatments. ABSTRACT: Spatial heterogeneity is a hallmark of cancer. Tumor heterogeneity can vary with time and location. The tumor microenvironment (TME) encompasses various cell types and their interactions that impart response to therapies. Therefore, a quantitative evaluation of tumor heterogeneity is crucial for the development of effective treatments. Different approaches, such as multiregional sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, analysis of autopsy samples, and longitudinal analysis of biopsy samples, can be used to analyze the intratumoral heterogeneity (ITH) and temporal evolution and to reveal the mechanisms of therapeutic response. However, because of the limitations of these data and the uncertainty associated with the time points of sample collection, having a complete understanding of intratumoral heterogeneity role is challenging. Here, we used a hybrid model that integrates a whole-patient compartmental quantitative-systems-pharmacology (QSP) model with a spatial agent-based model (ABM) describing the TME; we applied four spatial metrics to quantify model-simulated intratumoral heterogeneity and classified the TME immunoarchitecture for representative cases of effective and ineffective anti-PD-1 therapy. The four metrics, adopted from computational digital pathology, included mixing score, average neighbor frequency, Shannon’s entropy and area under the curve (AUC) of the G-cross function. A fifth non-spatial metric was used to supplement the analysis, which was the ratio of the number of cancer cells to immune cells. These metrics were utilized to classify the TME as “cold”, “compartmentalized” and “mixed”, which were related to treatment efficacy. The trends in these metrics for effective and ineffective treatments are in qualitative agreement with the clinical literature, indicating that compartmentalized immunoarchitecture is likely to result in more efficacious treatment outcomes. MDPI 2023-05-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10216176/ /pubmed/37345087 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15102750 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Nikfar, Mehdi
Mi, Haoyang
Gong, Chang
Kimko, Holly
Popel, Aleksander S.
Quantifying Intratumoral Heterogeneity and Immunoarchitecture Generated In-Silico by a Spatial Quantitative Systems Pharmacology Model
title Quantifying Intratumoral Heterogeneity and Immunoarchitecture Generated In-Silico by a Spatial Quantitative Systems Pharmacology Model
title_full Quantifying Intratumoral Heterogeneity and Immunoarchitecture Generated In-Silico by a Spatial Quantitative Systems Pharmacology Model
title_fullStr Quantifying Intratumoral Heterogeneity and Immunoarchitecture Generated In-Silico by a Spatial Quantitative Systems Pharmacology Model
title_full_unstemmed Quantifying Intratumoral Heterogeneity and Immunoarchitecture Generated In-Silico by a Spatial Quantitative Systems Pharmacology Model
title_short Quantifying Intratumoral Heterogeneity and Immunoarchitecture Generated In-Silico by a Spatial Quantitative Systems Pharmacology Model
title_sort quantifying intratumoral heterogeneity and immunoarchitecture generated in-silico by a spatial quantitative systems pharmacology model
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10216176/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37345087
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15102750
work_keys_str_mv AT nikfarmehdi quantifyingintratumoralheterogeneityandimmunoarchitecturegeneratedinsilicobyaspatialquantitativesystemspharmacologymodel
AT mihaoyang quantifyingintratumoralheterogeneityandimmunoarchitecturegeneratedinsilicobyaspatialquantitativesystemspharmacologymodel
AT gongchang quantifyingintratumoralheterogeneityandimmunoarchitecturegeneratedinsilicobyaspatialquantitativesystemspharmacologymodel
AT kimkoholly quantifyingintratumoralheterogeneityandimmunoarchitecturegeneratedinsilicobyaspatialquantitativesystemspharmacologymodel
AT popelaleksanders quantifyingintratumoralheterogeneityandimmunoarchitecturegeneratedinsilicobyaspatialquantitativesystemspharmacologymodel