Cargando…

Evaluation of antioxidant capacity, structure, and surface morphology of ginger (Zingiber officinale) using different extraction methods

The antioxidant capacity of ginger depends on the type of variety, growing conditions, postharvest, drying method, extraction, and measurement, among others. The objective of the research was to compare the efficiency of ultrasound (US), magnetic agitation (AM), maceration (M), and reflux (R) extrac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jorge-Montalvo, Paola, Vílchez-Perales, Carlos, Visitación-Figueroa, Lizardo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10220370/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37251458
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16516
_version_ 1785049205150056448
author Jorge-Montalvo, Paola
Vílchez-Perales, Carlos
Visitación-Figueroa, Lizardo
author_facet Jorge-Montalvo, Paola
Vílchez-Perales, Carlos
Visitación-Figueroa, Lizardo
author_sort Jorge-Montalvo, Paola
collection PubMed
description The antioxidant capacity of ginger depends on the type of variety, growing conditions, postharvest, drying method, extraction, and measurement, among others. The objective of the research was to compare the efficiency of ultrasound (US), magnetic agitation (AM), maceration (M), and reflux (R) extraction methods. In the GFD (fresh air-dried ginger) extract, the contents of total phenolic content (TFC), 6-gingerol (6-G), and 6-shogaol (6-S) were evaluated; as well as the antioxidant capacity by FRAP (ferric reducing antioxidant power) and IC(50) in DPPH (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl radical). In addition, structural and morphological changes were evaluated with FTIR and SEM, respectively. The results for all extraction methods for TFC, 6-G, and 6-S were between 9.422 and 10.037 mg EAG/g dry matter (dm), 4.072–4.838, and 0.194–0.263 mg/g dm respectively, with the highest values for TFC and 6-G for M and 6-S for R. FRAP and IC(50) in DPPH values were between 0.172 and 0.192 mmol Fe(2+)/g dm and 0.531–0.722 mg dm/mL respectively, presenting higher antioxidant capacity in M and R1, R2, and R3 (1, 2, and 5 h, respectively). Extracts from M and R1 methods presented lower FTIR transmittance values and greater changes in their surface morphology, with folds and breaks in the starch granules by SEM images. It is concluded that extracts with higher antioxidant capacity are obtained using medium polarity solvents such as methanol and with M and R1 methods. Because of the longer extraction time and moderate thermal stress, the structure and surface morphology of the extracted GFD sample showed greater changes on the surface of the starch granules and, consequently, greater extraction of bioactive compounds.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10220370
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102203702023-05-28 Evaluation of antioxidant capacity, structure, and surface morphology of ginger (Zingiber officinale) using different extraction methods Jorge-Montalvo, Paola Vílchez-Perales, Carlos Visitación-Figueroa, Lizardo Heliyon Research Article The antioxidant capacity of ginger depends on the type of variety, growing conditions, postharvest, drying method, extraction, and measurement, among others. The objective of the research was to compare the efficiency of ultrasound (US), magnetic agitation (AM), maceration (M), and reflux (R) extraction methods. In the GFD (fresh air-dried ginger) extract, the contents of total phenolic content (TFC), 6-gingerol (6-G), and 6-shogaol (6-S) were evaluated; as well as the antioxidant capacity by FRAP (ferric reducing antioxidant power) and IC(50) in DPPH (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl radical). In addition, structural and morphological changes were evaluated with FTIR and SEM, respectively. The results for all extraction methods for TFC, 6-G, and 6-S were between 9.422 and 10.037 mg EAG/g dry matter (dm), 4.072–4.838, and 0.194–0.263 mg/g dm respectively, with the highest values for TFC and 6-G for M and 6-S for R. FRAP and IC(50) in DPPH values were between 0.172 and 0.192 mmol Fe(2+)/g dm and 0.531–0.722 mg dm/mL respectively, presenting higher antioxidant capacity in M and R1, R2, and R3 (1, 2, and 5 h, respectively). Extracts from M and R1 methods presented lower FTIR transmittance values and greater changes in their surface morphology, with folds and breaks in the starch granules by SEM images. It is concluded that extracts with higher antioxidant capacity are obtained using medium polarity solvents such as methanol and with M and R1 methods. Because of the longer extraction time and moderate thermal stress, the structure and surface morphology of the extracted GFD sample showed greater changes on the surface of the starch granules and, consequently, greater extraction of bioactive compounds. Elsevier 2023-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10220370/ /pubmed/37251458 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16516 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Jorge-Montalvo, Paola
Vílchez-Perales, Carlos
Visitación-Figueroa, Lizardo
Evaluation of antioxidant capacity, structure, and surface morphology of ginger (Zingiber officinale) using different extraction methods
title Evaluation of antioxidant capacity, structure, and surface morphology of ginger (Zingiber officinale) using different extraction methods
title_full Evaluation of antioxidant capacity, structure, and surface morphology of ginger (Zingiber officinale) using different extraction methods
title_fullStr Evaluation of antioxidant capacity, structure, and surface morphology of ginger (Zingiber officinale) using different extraction methods
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of antioxidant capacity, structure, and surface morphology of ginger (Zingiber officinale) using different extraction methods
title_short Evaluation of antioxidant capacity, structure, and surface morphology of ginger (Zingiber officinale) using different extraction methods
title_sort evaluation of antioxidant capacity, structure, and surface morphology of ginger (zingiber officinale) using different extraction methods
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10220370/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37251458
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16516
work_keys_str_mv AT jorgemontalvopaola evaluationofantioxidantcapacitystructureandsurfacemorphologyofgingerzingiberofficinaleusingdifferentextractionmethods
AT vilchezperalescarlos evaluationofantioxidantcapacitystructureandsurfacemorphologyofgingerzingiberofficinaleusingdifferentextractionmethods
AT visitacionfigueroalizardo evaluationofantioxidantcapacitystructureandsurfacemorphologyofgingerzingiberofficinaleusingdifferentextractionmethods