Cargando…

Hypothetical Estimands in Clinical Trials: A Unification of Causal Inference and Missing Data Methods

The ICH E9 addendum introduces the term intercurrent event to refer to events that happen after treatment initiation and that can either preclude observation of the outcome of interest or affect its interpretation. It proposes five strategies for handling intercurrent events to form an estimand but...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Olarte Parra, Camila, Daniel, Rhian M., Bartlett, Jonathan W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10228513/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37260584
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19466315.2022.2081599
_version_ 1785050981625495552
author Olarte Parra, Camila
Daniel, Rhian M.
Bartlett, Jonathan W.
author_facet Olarte Parra, Camila
Daniel, Rhian M.
Bartlett, Jonathan W.
author_sort Olarte Parra, Camila
collection PubMed
description The ICH E9 addendum introduces the term intercurrent event to refer to events that happen after treatment initiation and that can either preclude observation of the outcome of interest or affect its interpretation. It proposes five strategies for handling intercurrent events to form an estimand but does not suggest statistical methods for estimation. In this article we focus on the hypothetical strategy, where the treatment effect is defined under the hypothetical scenario in which the intercurrent event is prevented. For its estimation, we consider causal inference and missing data methods. We establish that certain “causal inference estimators” are identical to certain “missing data estimators.” These links may help those familiar with one set of methods but not the other. Moreover, using potential outcome notation allows us to state more clearly the assumptions on which missing data methods rely to estimate hypothetical estimands. This helps to indicate whether estimating a hypothetical estimand is reasonable, and what data should be used in the analysis. We show that hypothetical estimands can be estimated by exploiting data after intercurrent event occurrence, which is typically not used. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10228513
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102285132023-05-31 Hypothetical Estimands in Clinical Trials: A Unification of Causal Inference and Missing Data Methods Olarte Parra, Camila Daniel, Rhian M. Bartlett, Jonathan W. Stat Biopharm Res Research Articles The ICH E9 addendum introduces the term intercurrent event to refer to events that happen after treatment initiation and that can either preclude observation of the outcome of interest or affect its interpretation. It proposes five strategies for handling intercurrent events to form an estimand but does not suggest statistical methods for estimation. In this article we focus on the hypothetical strategy, where the treatment effect is defined under the hypothetical scenario in which the intercurrent event is prevented. For its estimation, we consider causal inference and missing data methods. We establish that certain “causal inference estimators” are identical to certain “missing data estimators.” These links may help those familiar with one set of methods but not the other. Moreover, using potential outcome notation allows us to state more clearly the assumptions on which missing data methods rely to estimate hypothetical estimands. This helps to indicate whether estimating a hypothetical estimand is reasonable, and what data should be used in the analysis. We show that hypothetical estimands can be estimated by exploiting data after intercurrent event occurrence, which is typically not used. Supplementary materials for this article are available online. Taylor & Francis 2022-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10228513/ /pubmed/37260584 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19466315.2022.2081599 Text en © 2022 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Olarte Parra, Camila
Daniel, Rhian M.
Bartlett, Jonathan W.
Hypothetical Estimands in Clinical Trials: A Unification of Causal Inference and Missing Data Methods
title Hypothetical Estimands in Clinical Trials: A Unification of Causal Inference and Missing Data Methods
title_full Hypothetical Estimands in Clinical Trials: A Unification of Causal Inference and Missing Data Methods
title_fullStr Hypothetical Estimands in Clinical Trials: A Unification of Causal Inference and Missing Data Methods
title_full_unstemmed Hypothetical Estimands in Clinical Trials: A Unification of Causal Inference and Missing Data Methods
title_short Hypothetical Estimands in Clinical Trials: A Unification of Causal Inference and Missing Data Methods
title_sort hypothetical estimands in clinical trials: a unification of causal inference and missing data methods
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10228513/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37260584
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19466315.2022.2081599
work_keys_str_mv AT olarteparracamila hypotheticalestimandsinclinicaltrialsaunificationofcausalinferenceandmissingdatamethods
AT danielrhianm hypotheticalestimandsinclinicaltrialsaunificationofcausalinferenceandmissingdatamethods
AT bartlettjonathanw hypotheticalestimandsinclinicaltrialsaunificationofcausalinferenceandmissingdatamethods