Cargando…
Evaluation of Continuing Professional Development for Physicians – Time for Change: A Scoping Review
INTRODUCTION: Evaluation of education interventions is essential for continuous improvement as it provides insights into how and why outcomes occur. Specifically, for physicians’ continuing professional development (CPD) programs, which aim to upskill physicians in a range of practice-essential doma...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Ubiquity Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10237247/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37274809 http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/pme.838 |
_version_ | 1785053119709708288 |
---|---|
author | Hosseini, Shera Allen, Louise Khalid, Faran Li, Donny Stellrecht, Elizabeth Howard, Michelle Chan, Teresa M. |
author_facet | Hosseini, Shera Allen, Louise Khalid, Faran Li, Donny Stellrecht, Elizabeth Howard, Michelle Chan, Teresa M. |
author_sort | Hosseini, Shera |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Evaluation of education interventions is essential for continuous improvement as it provides insights into how and why outcomes occur. Specifically, for physicians’ continuing professional development (CPD) programs, which aim to upskill physicians in a range of practice-essential domains, evaluations are crucial to assure physicians’ continuous development, enhanced patient care and safety. However, evaluations of health professions education (HPE) interventions tend to be outcomes focused, failing to capture how and why outcomes occur. This scoping review aimed to identify evaluation techniques used to evaluate CPD programs for physicians, and to determine how these techniques are being implemented as well as the their quality. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, among others for English publications on evaluation of CPD programs for physicians, in the past decade. We used a data charting template to extract study details regarding the evaluation techniques and produced a checklist to assess the quality of the evaluations. RESULTS: 101 studies were included; of which 91 studies did not use an evaluation framework. Our findings revealed shortcomings in the evaluations of CPD programs including lack of attention to: intervention processes; unintended outcomes and contextual factors; use of theory; evaluation framework use; and rationale for chosen evaluation method. DISCUSSION: Our findings highlighted major gaps in the evaluation techniques employed in physicians’ CPD. Attention needs to be paid to evaluating both program processes and outcomes to illuminate how and why impacts are or are not occurring. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10237247 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Ubiquity Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102372472023-06-03 Evaluation of Continuing Professional Development for Physicians – Time for Change: A Scoping Review Hosseini, Shera Allen, Louise Khalid, Faran Li, Donny Stellrecht, Elizabeth Howard, Michelle Chan, Teresa M. Perspect Med Educ Review INTRODUCTION: Evaluation of education interventions is essential for continuous improvement as it provides insights into how and why outcomes occur. Specifically, for physicians’ continuing professional development (CPD) programs, which aim to upskill physicians in a range of practice-essential domains, evaluations are crucial to assure physicians’ continuous development, enhanced patient care and safety. However, evaluations of health professions education (HPE) interventions tend to be outcomes focused, failing to capture how and why outcomes occur. This scoping review aimed to identify evaluation techniques used to evaluate CPD programs for physicians, and to determine how these techniques are being implemented as well as the their quality. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, among others for English publications on evaluation of CPD programs for physicians, in the past decade. We used a data charting template to extract study details regarding the evaluation techniques and produced a checklist to assess the quality of the evaluations. RESULTS: 101 studies were included; of which 91 studies did not use an evaluation framework. Our findings revealed shortcomings in the evaluations of CPD programs including lack of attention to: intervention processes; unintended outcomes and contextual factors; use of theory; evaluation framework use; and rationale for chosen evaluation method. DISCUSSION: Our findings highlighted major gaps in the evaluation techniques employed in physicians’ CPD. Attention needs to be paid to evaluating both program processes and outcomes to illuminate how and why impacts are or are not occurring. Ubiquity Press 2023-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10237247/ /pubmed/37274809 http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/pme.838 Text en Copyright: © 2023 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Review Hosseini, Shera Allen, Louise Khalid, Faran Li, Donny Stellrecht, Elizabeth Howard, Michelle Chan, Teresa M. Evaluation of Continuing Professional Development for Physicians – Time for Change: A Scoping Review |
title | Evaluation of Continuing Professional Development for Physicians – Time for Change: A Scoping Review |
title_full | Evaluation of Continuing Professional Development for Physicians – Time for Change: A Scoping Review |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of Continuing Professional Development for Physicians – Time for Change: A Scoping Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Continuing Professional Development for Physicians – Time for Change: A Scoping Review |
title_short | Evaluation of Continuing Professional Development for Physicians – Time for Change: A Scoping Review |
title_sort | evaluation of continuing professional development for physicians – time for change: a scoping review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10237247/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37274809 http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/pme.838 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hosseinishera evaluationofcontinuingprofessionaldevelopmentforphysicianstimeforchangeascopingreview AT allenlouise evaluationofcontinuingprofessionaldevelopmentforphysicianstimeforchangeascopingreview AT khalidfaran evaluationofcontinuingprofessionaldevelopmentforphysicianstimeforchangeascopingreview AT lidonny evaluationofcontinuingprofessionaldevelopmentforphysicianstimeforchangeascopingreview AT stellrechtelizabeth evaluationofcontinuingprofessionaldevelopmentforphysicianstimeforchangeascopingreview AT howardmichelle evaluationofcontinuingprofessionaldevelopmentforphysicianstimeforchangeascopingreview AT chanteresam evaluationofcontinuingprofessionaldevelopmentforphysicianstimeforchangeascopingreview |