Cargando…

Altered cytoplasmic and nuclear ADP‐ribosylation levels analyzed with an improved ADP‐ribose binder are a prognostic factor in renal cell carcinoma

ADP‐ribosylation (ADPR) of proteins is catalyzed by ADP‐ribosyltransferases, which are targeted by inhibitors (i.e. poly(ADP‐ribose) polymerase inhibitors [PARPi]). Although renal cell carcinoma (RCC) cells are sensitive in vitro to PARPi, studies on the association between ADPR levels and somatic l...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schraml, Peter, Aimi, Fabio, Zoche, Martin, Aguilera‐Garcia, Domingo, Arnold, Fabian, Moch, Holger, Hottiger, Michael O
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10240151/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36999983
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cjp2.320
Descripción
Sumario:ADP‐ribosylation (ADPR) of proteins is catalyzed by ADP‐ribosyltransferases, which are targeted by inhibitors (i.e. poly(ADP‐ribose) polymerase inhibitors [PARPi]). Although renal cell carcinoma (RCC) cells are sensitive in vitro to PARPi, studies on the association between ADPR levels and somatic loss of function mutations in DNA damage repair genes are currently missing. Here we observed, in two clear cell RCC (ccRCC) patient cohorts (n = 257 and n = 241) stained with an engineered ADP‐ribose binding macrodomain (eAf1521), that decreased cytoplasmic ADPR (cyADPR) levels significantly correlated with late tumor stage, high‐ISUP (the International Society of Urological Pathology) grade, presence of necrosis, dense lymphocyte infiltration, and worse patient survival (p < 0.01 each). cyADPR proved to be an independent prognostic factor (p = 0.001). Comparably, absence of nuclear ADPR staining in ccRCC correlated with absence of PARP1 staining (p < 0.01) and worse patient outcome (p < 0.05). In papillary RCC the absence of cyADPR was also significantly associated with tumor progression and worse patient outcome (p < 0.05 each). To interrogate whether the ADPR status could be associated with genetic alterations in DNA repair, chromatin remodeling, and histone modulation, we performed DNA sequence analysis and identified a significant association of increased ARID1A mutations in ccRCC(cyADPR+++/PARP1+) compared with ccRCC(cyADPR−/PARP1−) (31% versus 4%; p < 0.05). Collectively, our data suggest the prognostic value of nuclear and cytoplasmic ADPR levels in RCC that might be further influenced by genetic alterations.