Cargando…
Managers perception of hospital employees’ effort-reward imbalance
OBJECTIVE: Hospitals are frequently associated with poor working conditions that can lead to work stress and increase the risk for reduced employee well-being. Managers can shape and improve working conditions and thereby, the health of their teams. Thus, as a prerequisite, managers need to be aware...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10246112/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37280659 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12995-023-00376-4 |
_version_ | 1785054980154064896 |
---|---|
author | Heming, Meike Siegrist, Johannes Erschens, Rebecca Genrich, Melanie Hander, Nicole R. Junne, Florian Küllenberg, Janna K. Müller, Andreas Worringer, Britta Angerer, Peter |
author_facet | Heming, Meike Siegrist, Johannes Erschens, Rebecca Genrich, Melanie Hander, Nicole R. Junne, Florian Küllenberg, Janna K. Müller, Andreas Worringer, Britta Angerer, Peter |
author_sort | Heming, Meike |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Hospitals are frequently associated with poor working conditions that can lead to work stress and increase the risk for reduced employee well-being. Managers can shape and improve working conditions and thereby, the health of their teams. Thus, as a prerequisite, managers need to be aware of their employees’ stress levels. This study had two objectives: At first, it aimed to test the criterion validity of the Effort-Reward Imbalance (ERI) questionnaire measuring psychosocial workload in hospital employees. Secondly, mean scales of the ERI questionnaire filled in by employees were compared with mean scales of an adapted ERI questionnaire, in which managers assessed working conditions of their employees. METHODS: Managers (n = 141) from three hospitals located in Germany assessed working conditions of their employees with an adapted external, other-oriented questionnaire. Employees (n = 197) of the mentioned hospitals completed the short version of the ERI questionnaire to assess their working conditions. Confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) were applied to test factorial validity, using the ERI scales for the two study groups. Criterion validity was assessed with multiple linear regression analysis of associations between ERI scales and well-being among employees. RESULTS: The questionnaires demonstrated acceptable psychometric properties in terms of internal consistency of scales, although some indices of model fit resulting from CFA were of borderline significance. Concerning the first objective, effort, reward, and the ratio of effort-reward imbalance were significantly associated with well-being of employees. With regard to the second objective, first tentative findings showed that managers’ ratings of their employees’ effort at work was quite accurate, whereas their reward was overestimated. CONCLUSIONS: With its documented criterion validity the ERI questionnaire can be used as a screening tool of workload among hospital employees. Moreover, in the context of work-related health promotion, managers’ perceptions of their employees’ workload deserve increased attention as first findings point to some discrepancies between their perceptions and those provided by employees. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12995-023-00376-4. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10246112 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102461122023-06-08 Managers perception of hospital employees’ effort-reward imbalance Heming, Meike Siegrist, Johannes Erschens, Rebecca Genrich, Melanie Hander, Nicole R. Junne, Florian Küllenberg, Janna K. Müller, Andreas Worringer, Britta Angerer, Peter J Occup Med Toxicol Research OBJECTIVE: Hospitals are frequently associated with poor working conditions that can lead to work stress and increase the risk for reduced employee well-being. Managers can shape and improve working conditions and thereby, the health of their teams. Thus, as a prerequisite, managers need to be aware of their employees’ stress levels. This study had two objectives: At first, it aimed to test the criterion validity of the Effort-Reward Imbalance (ERI) questionnaire measuring psychosocial workload in hospital employees. Secondly, mean scales of the ERI questionnaire filled in by employees were compared with mean scales of an adapted ERI questionnaire, in which managers assessed working conditions of their employees. METHODS: Managers (n = 141) from three hospitals located in Germany assessed working conditions of their employees with an adapted external, other-oriented questionnaire. Employees (n = 197) of the mentioned hospitals completed the short version of the ERI questionnaire to assess their working conditions. Confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) were applied to test factorial validity, using the ERI scales for the two study groups. Criterion validity was assessed with multiple linear regression analysis of associations between ERI scales and well-being among employees. RESULTS: The questionnaires demonstrated acceptable psychometric properties in terms of internal consistency of scales, although some indices of model fit resulting from CFA were of borderline significance. Concerning the first objective, effort, reward, and the ratio of effort-reward imbalance were significantly associated with well-being of employees. With regard to the second objective, first tentative findings showed that managers’ ratings of their employees’ effort at work was quite accurate, whereas their reward was overestimated. CONCLUSIONS: With its documented criterion validity the ERI questionnaire can be used as a screening tool of workload among hospital employees. Moreover, in the context of work-related health promotion, managers’ perceptions of their employees’ workload deserve increased attention as first findings point to some discrepancies between their perceptions and those provided by employees. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12995-023-00376-4. BioMed Central 2023-06-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10246112/ /pubmed/37280659 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12995-023-00376-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Heming, Meike Siegrist, Johannes Erschens, Rebecca Genrich, Melanie Hander, Nicole R. Junne, Florian Küllenberg, Janna K. Müller, Andreas Worringer, Britta Angerer, Peter Managers perception of hospital employees’ effort-reward imbalance |
title | Managers perception of hospital employees’ effort-reward imbalance |
title_full | Managers perception of hospital employees’ effort-reward imbalance |
title_fullStr | Managers perception of hospital employees’ effort-reward imbalance |
title_full_unstemmed | Managers perception of hospital employees’ effort-reward imbalance |
title_short | Managers perception of hospital employees’ effort-reward imbalance |
title_sort | managers perception of hospital employees’ effort-reward imbalance |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10246112/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37280659 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12995-023-00376-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hemingmeike managersperceptionofhospitalemployeeseffortrewardimbalance AT siegristjohannes managersperceptionofhospitalemployeeseffortrewardimbalance AT erschensrebecca managersperceptionofhospitalemployeeseffortrewardimbalance AT genrichmelanie managersperceptionofhospitalemployeeseffortrewardimbalance AT handernicoler managersperceptionofhospitalemployeeseffortrewardimbalance AT junneflorian managersperceptionofhospitalemployeeseffortrewardimbalance AT kullenbergjannak managersperceptionofhospitalemployeeseffortrewardimbalance AT mullerandreas managersperceptionofhospitalemployeeseffortrewardimbalance AT worringerbritta managersperceptionofhospitalemployeeseffortrewardimbalance AT angererpeter managersperceptionofhospitalemployeeseffortrewardimbalance |