Guidance to best tools and practices for systematic reviews

Mostrar otras versiones (3)

Data continue to accumulate indicating that many systematic reviews are methodologically flawed, biased, redundant, or uninformative. Some improvements have occurred in recent years based on empirical methods research and standardization of appraisal tools; however, many authors do not routinely or...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kolaski, Kat, Logan, Lynne Romeiser, Ioannidis, John P. A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Guideline
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10247272/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37286949
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-023-08304-x

Internet

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10247272/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37286949
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-023-08304-x

Ejemplares similares