Cargando…

FFAR2 antagonizes TLR2- and TLR3-induced lung cancer progression via the inhibition of AMPK-TAK1 signaling axis for the activation of NF-κB

BACKGROUND: Free fatty acid receptors (FFARs) and toll-like receptors (TLRs) recognize microbial metabolites and conserved microbial products, respectively, and are functionally implicated in inflammation and cancer. However, whether the crosstalk between FFARs and TLRs affects lung cancer progressi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Mi-Jeong, Kim, Ji Young, Shin, Ji Hye, Kang, Yeeun, Lee, Ji Su, Son, Juhee, Jeong, Soo-Kyung, Kim, Daesik, Kim, Duk-Hwan, Chun, Eunyoung, Lee, Ki-Young
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10249240/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37287005
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13578-023-01038-y
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Free fatty acid receptors (FFARs) and toll-like receptors (TLRs) recognize microbial metabolites and conserved microbial products, respectively, and are functionally implicated in inflammation and cancer. However, whether the crosstalk between FFARs and TLRs affects lung cancer progression has never been addressed. METHODS: We analyzed the association between FFARs and TLRs using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) lung cancer data and our cohort of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patient data (n = 42), and gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) was performed. For the functional analysis, we generated FFAR2-knockout (FFAR2KO) A549 and FFAR2KO H1299 human lung cancer cells and performed biochemical mechanistic studies and cancer progression assays, including migration, invasion, and colony-formation assays, in response to TLR stimulation. RESULTS: The clinical TCGA data showed a significant down-regulation of FFAR2, but not FFAR1, FFAR3, and FFAR4, in lung cancer, and a negative correlation with TLR2 and TLR3. Notably, GSEA showed significant enrichment in gene sets related to the cancer module, the innate signaling pathway, and the cytokine-chemokine signaling pathway in FFAR2(Down)TLR2(Up)TLR3(Up) lung tumor tissues (LTTs) vs. FFAR2(up)TLR2(Down)TLR3(Down) LTTs. Functionally, treatment with propionate (an agonist of FFAR2) significantly inhibited human A549 or H1299 lung cancer migration, invasion, and colony formation induced by TLR2 or TLR3 through the attenuation of the cAMP-AMPK-TAK1 signaling axis for the activation of NF-κB. Moreover, FFAR2KO A549 and FFAR2KO H1299 human lung cancer cells showed marked increases in cell migration, invasion, and colony formation in response to TLR2 or TLR3 stimulation, accompanied by elevations in NF-κB activation, cAMP levels, and the production of C-C motif chemokine ligand (CCL)2, interleukin (IL)-6, and matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) 2 cytokines. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that FFAR2 signaling antagonized TLR2- and TLR3-induced lung cancer progression via the suppression of the cAMP-AMPK-TAK1 signaling axis for the activation of NF-κB, and its agonist might be a potential therapeutic agent for the treatment of lung cancer. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13578-023-01038-y.