Guidance to Best Tools and Practices for Systematic Reviews

Mostrar otras versiones (3)

». Data continue to accumulate indicating that many systematic reviews are methodologically flawed, biased, redundant, or uninformative. Some improvements have occurred in recent years based on empirical methods research and standardization of appraisal tools; however, many authors do not routinely...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kolaski, Kat, Logan, Lynne Romeiser, Ioannidis, John P.A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. 2023
Materias:
Editorial
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10259219/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37285444
http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.RVW.23.00077

Internet

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10259219/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37285444
http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.RVW.23.00077

Ejemplares similares