Cargando…
Guidance to Best Tools and Practices for Systematic Reviews
». Data continue to accumulate indicating that many systematic reviews are methodologically flawed, biased, redundant, or uninformative. Some improvements have occurred in recent years based on empirical methods research and standardization of appraisal tools; however, many authors do not routinely...
Autores principales: | Kolaski, Kat, Logan, Lynne Romeiser, Ioannidis, John P.A. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10259219/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37285444 http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.RVW.23.00077 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Guidance to best tools and practices for systematic reviews
por: Kolaski, Kat, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Guidance to best tools and practices for systematic reviews(1)
por: Kolaski, Kat, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Guidance to best tools and practices for systematic reviews
por: Kolaski, Kat, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Guidance to best tools and practices for systematic reviews
por: Kolaski, Kat, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Rapid guidelines – timely and important guidance needed for setting standards and best practices
por: Pang, Tikki, et al.
Publicado: (2018)