Cargando…

Propensity of Patient-Derived iPSCs for Retinal Differentiation: Implications for Autologous Cell Replacement

Prior to use, newly generated induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC) should be thoroughly validated. While excellent validation and release testing assays designed to evaluate potency, genetic integrity, and sterility exist, they do not have the ability to predict cell type-specific differentiation c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cooke, Jessica A, Voigt, Andrew P, Collingwood, Michael A, Stone, Nicholas E, Whitmore, S Scott, DeLuca, Adam P, Burnight, Erin R, Anfinson, Kristin R, Vakulskas, Christopher A, Reutzel, Austin J, Daggett, Heather T, Andorf, Jeaneen L, Stone, Edwin M, Mullins, Robert F, Tucker, Budd A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10267581/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37221451
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/stcltm/szad028
_version_ 1785058958500691968
author Cooke, Jessica A
Voigt, Andrew P
Collingwood, Michael A
Stone, Nicholas E
Whitmore, S Scott
DeLuca, Adam P
Burnight, Erin R
Anfinson, Kristin R
Vakulskas, Christopher A
Reutzel, Austin J
Daggett, Heather T
Andorf, Jeaneen L
Stone, Edwin M
Mullins, Robert F
Tucker, Budd A
author_facet Cooke, Jessica A
Voigt, Andrew P
Collingwood, Michael A
Stone, Nicholas E
Whitmore, S Scott
DeLuca, Adam P
Burnight, Erin R
Anfinson, Kristin R
Vakulskas, Christopher A
Reutzel, Austin J
Daggett, Heather T
Andorf, Jeaneen L
Stone, Edwin M
Mullins, Robert F
Tucker, Budd A
author_sort Cooke, Jessica A
collection PubMed
description Prior to use, newly generated induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC) should be thoroughly validated. While excellent validation and release testing assays designed to evaluate potency, genetic integrity, and sterility exist, they do not have the ability to predict cell type-specific differentiation capacity. Selection of iPSC lines that have limited capacity to produce high-quality transplantable cells, places significant strain on valuable clinical manufacturing resources. The purpose of this study was to determine the degree and root cause of variability in retinal differentiation capacity between cGMP-derived patient iPSC lines. In turn, our goal was to develop a release testing assay that could be used to augment the widely used ScoreCard panel. IPSCs were generated from 15 patients (14-76 years old), differentiated into retinal organoids, and scored based on their retinal differentiation capacity. Despite significant differences in retinal differentiation propensity, RNA-sequencing revealed remarkable similarity between patient-derived iPSC lines prior to differentiation. At 7 days of differentiation, significant differences in gene expression could be detected. Ingenuity pathway analysis revealed perturbations in pathways associated with pluripotency and early cell fate commitment. For example, good and poor producers had noticeably different expressions of OCT4 and SOX2 effector genes. QPCR assays targeting genes identified via RNA sequencing were developed and validated in a masked fashion using iPSCs from 8 independent patients. A subset of 14 genes, which include the retinal cell fate markers RAX, LHX2, VSX2, and SIX6 (all elevated in the good producers), were found to be predictive of retinal differentiation propensity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10267581
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102675812023-06-15 Propensity of Patient-Derived iPSCs for Retinal Differentiation: Implications for Autologous Cell Replacement Cooke, Jessica A Voigt, Andrew P Collingwood, Michael A Stone, Nicholas E Whitmore, S Scott DeLuca, Adam P Burnight, Erin R Anfinson, Kristin R Vakulskas, Christopher A Reutzel, Austin J Daggett, Heather T Andorf, Jeaneen L Stone, Edwin M Mullins, Robert F Tucker, Budd A Stem Cells Transl Med Enabling Technologies for Cell-Based Clinical Translations Prior to use, newly generated induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC) should be thoroughly validated. While excellent validation and release testing assays designed to evaluate potency, genetic integrity, and sterility exist, they do not have the ability to predict cell type-specific differentiation capacity. Selection of iPSC lines that have limited capacity to produce high-quality transplantable cells, places significant strain on valuable clinical manufacturing resources. The purpose of this study was to determine the degree and root cause of variability in retinal differentiation capacity between cGMP-derived patient iPSC lines. In turn, our goal was to develop a release testing assay that could be used to augment the widely used ScoreCard panel. IPSCs were generated from 15 patients (14-76 years old), differentiated into retinal organoids, and scored based on their retinal differentiation capacity. Despite significant differences in retinal differentiation propensity, RNA-sequencing revealed remarkable similarity between patient-derived iPSC lines prior to differentiation. At 7 days of differentiation, significant differences in gene expression could be detected. Ingenuity pathway analysis revealed perturbations in pathways associated with pluripotency and early cell fate commitment. For example, good and poor producers had noticeably different expressions of OCT4 and SOX2 effector genes. QPCR assays targeting genes identified via RNA sequencing were developed and validated in a masked fashion using iPSCs from 8 independent patients. A subset of 14 genes, which include the retinal cell fate markers RAX, LHX2, VSX2, and SIX6 (all elevated in the good producers), were found to be predictive of retinal differentiation propensity. Oxford University Press 2023-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10267581/ /pubmed/37221451 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/stcltm/szad028 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.
spellingShingle Enabling Technologies for Cell-Based Clinical Translations
Cooke, Jessica A
Voigt, Andrew P
Collingwood, Michael A
Stone, Nicholas E
Whitmore, S Scott
DeLuca, Adam P
Burnight, Erin R
Anfinson, Kristin R
Vakulskas, Christopher A
Reutzel, Austin J
Daggett, Heather T
Andorf, Jeaneen L
Stone, Edwin M
Mullins, Robert F
Tucker, Budd A
Propensity of Patient-Derived iPSCs for Retinal Differentiation: Implications for Autologous Cell Replacement
title Propensity of Patient-Derived iPSCs for Retinal Differentiation: Implications for Autologous Cell Replacement
title_full Propensity of Patient-Derived iPSCs for Retinal Differentiation: Implications for Autologous Cell Replacement
title_fullStr Propensity of Patient-Derived iPSCs for Retinal Differentiation: Implications for Autologous Cell Replacement
title_full_unstemmed Propensity of Patient-Derived iPSCs for Retinal Differentiation: Implications for Autologous Cell Replacement
title_short Propensity of Patient-Derived iPSCs for Retinal Differentiation: Implications for Autologous Cell Replacement
title_sort propensity of patient-derived ipscs for retinal differentiation: implications for autologous cell replacement
topic Enabling Technologies for Cell-Based Clinical Translations
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10267581/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37221451
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/stcltm/szad028
work_keys_str_mv AT cookejessicaa propensityofpatientderivedipscsforretinaldifferentiationimplicationsforautologouscellreplacement
AT voigtandrewp propensityofpatientderivedipscsforretinaldifferentiationimplicationsforautologouscellreplacement
AT collingwoodmichaela propensityofpatientderivedipscsforretinaldifferentiationimplicationsforautologouscellreplacement
AT stonenicholase propensityofpatientderivedipscsforretinaldifferentiationimplicationsforautologouscellreplacement
AT whitmoresscott propensityofpatientderivedipscsforretinaldifferentiationimplicationsforautologouscellreplacement
AT delucaadamp propensityofpatientderivedipscsforretinaldifferentiationimplicationsforautologouscellreplacement
AT burnighterinr propensityofpatientderivedipscsforretinaldifferentiationimplicationsforautologouscellreplacement
AT anfinsonkristinr propensityofpatientderivedipscsforretinaldifferentiationimplicationsforautologouscellreplacement
AT vakulskaschristophera propensityofpatientderivedipscsforretinaldifferentiationimplicationsforautologouscellreplacement
AT reutzelaustinj propensityofpatientderivedipscsforretinaldifferentiationimplicationsforautologouscellreplacement
AT daggettheathert propensityofpatientderivedipscsforretinaldifferentiationimplicationsforautologouscellreplacement
AT andorfjeaneenl propensityofpatientderivedipscsforretinaldifferentiationimplicationsforautologouscellreplacement
AT stoneedwinm propensityofpatientderivedipscsforretinaldifferentiationimplicationsforautologouscellreplacement
AT mullinsrobertf propensityofpatientderivedipscsforretinaldifferentiationimplicationsforautologouscellreplacement
AT tuckerbudda propensityofpatientderivedipscsforretinaldifferentiationimplicationsforautologouscellreplacement