Cargando…
Propensity of Patient-Derived iPSCs for Retinal Differentiation: Implications for Autologous Cell Replacement
Prior to use, newly generated induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC) should be thoroughly validated. While excellent validation and release testing assays designed to evaluate potency, genetic integrity, and sterility exist, they do not have the ability to predict cell type-specific differentiation c...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10267581/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37221451 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/stcltm/szad028 |
_version_ | 1785058958500691968 |
---|---|
author | Cooke, Jessica A Voigt, Andrew P Collingwood, Michael A Stone, Nicholas E Whitmore, S Scott DeLuca, Adam P Burnight, Erin R Anfinson, Kristin R Vakulskas, Christopher A Reutzel, Austin J Daggett, Heather T Andorf, Jeaneen L Stone, Edwin M Mullins, Robert F Tucker, Budd A |
author_facet | Cooke, Jessica A Voigt, Andrew P Collingwood, Michael A Stone, Nicholas E Whitmore, S Scott DeLuca, Adam P Burnight, Erin R Anfinson, Kristin R Vakulskas, Christopher A Reutzel, Austin J Daggett, Heather T Andorf, Jeaneen L Stone, Edwin M Mullins, Robert F Tucker, Budd A |
author_sort | Cooke, Jessica A |
collection | PubMed |
description | Prior to use, newly generated induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC) should be thoroughly validated. While excellent validation and release testing assays designed to evaluate potency, genetic integrity, and sterility exist, they do not have the ability to predict cell type-specific differentiation capacity. Selection of iPSC lines that have limited capacity to produce high-quality transplantable cells, places significant strain on valuable clinical manufacturing resources. The purpose of this study was to determine the degree and root cause of variability in retinal differentiation capacity between cGMP-derived patient iPSC lines. In turn, our goal was to develop a release testing assay that could be used to augment the widely used ScoreCard panel. IPSCs were generated from 15 patients (14-76 years old), differentiated into retinal organoids, and scored based on their retinal differentiation capacity. Despite significant differences in retinal differentiation propensity, RNA-sequencing revealed remarkable similarity between patient-derived iPSC lines prior to differentiation. At 7 days of differentiation, significant differences in gene expression could be detected. Ingenuity pathway analysis revealed perturbations in pathways associated with pluripotency and early cell fate commitment. For example, good and poor producers had noticeably different expressions of OCT4 and SOX2 effector genes. QPCR assays targeting genes identified via RNA sequencing were developed and validated in a masked fashion using iPSCs from 8 independent patients. A subset of 14 genes, which include the retinal cell fate markers RAX, LHX2, VSX2, and SIX6 (all elevated in the good producers), were found to be predictive of retinal differentiation propensity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10267581 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102675812023-06-15 Propensity of Patient-Derived iPSCs for Retinal Differentiation: Implications for Autologous Cell Replacement Cooke, Jessica A Voigt, Andrew P Collingwood, Michael A Stone, Nicholas E Whitmore, S Scott DeLuca, Adam P Burnight, Erin R Anfinson, Kristin R Vakulskas, Christopher A Reutzel, Austin J Daggett, Heather T Andorf, Jeaneen L Stone, Edwin M Mullins, Robert F Tucker, Budd A Stem Cells Transl Med Enabling Technologies for Cell-Based Clinical Translations Prior to use, newly generated induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC) should be thoroughly validated. While excellent validation and release testing assays designed to evaluate potency, genetic integrity, and sterility exist, they do not have the ability to predict cell type-specific differentiation capacity. Selection of iPSC lines that have limited capacity to produce high-quality transplantable cells, places significant strain on valuable clinical manufacturing resources. The purpose of this study was to determine the degree and root cause of variability in retinal differentiation capacity between cGMP-derived patient iPSC lines. In turn, our goal was to develop a release testing assay that could be used to augment the widely used ScoreCard panel. IPSCs were generated from 15 patients (14-76 years old), differentiated into retinal organoids, and scored based on their retinal differentiation capacity. Despite significant differences in retinal differentiation propensity, RNA-sequencing revealed remarkable similarity between patient-derived iPSC lines prior to differentiation. At 7 days of differentiation, significant differences in gene expression could be detected. Ingenuity pathway analysis revealed perturbations in pathways associated with pluripotency and early cell fate commitment. For example, good and poor producers had noticeably different expressions of OCT4 and SOX2 effector genes. QPCR assays targeting genes identified via RNA sequencing were developed and validated in a masked fashion using iPSCs from 8 independent patients. A subset of 14 genes, which include the retinal cell fate markers RAX, LHX2, VSX2, and SIX6 (all elevated in the good producers), were found to be predictive of retinal differentiation propensity. Oxford University Press 2023-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10267581/ /pubmed/37221451 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/stcltm/szad028 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com. |
spellingShingle | Enabling Technologies for Cell-Based Clinical Translations Cooke, Jessica A Voigt, Andrew P Collingwood, Michael A Stone, Nicholas E Whitmore, S Scott DeLuca, Adam P Burnight, Erin R Anfinson, Kristin R Vakulskas, Christopher A Reutzel, Austin J Daggett, Heather T Andorf, Jeaneen L Stone, Edwin M Mullins, Robert F Tucker, Budd A Propensity of Patient-Derived iPSCs for Retinal Differentiation: Implications for Autologous Cell Replacement |
title | Propensity of Patient-Derived iPSCs for Retinal Differentiation: Implications for Autologous Cell Replacement |
title_full | Propensity of Patient-Derived iPSCs for Retinal Differentiation: Implications for Autologous Cell Replacement |
title_fullStr | Propensity of Patient-Derived iPSCs for Retinal Differentiation: Implications for Autologous Cell Replacement |
title_full_unstemmed | Propensity of Patient-Derived iPSCs for Retinal Differentiation: Implications for Autologous Cell Replacement |
title_short | Propensity of Patient-Derived iPSCs for Retinal Differentiation: Implications for Autologous Cell Replacement |
title_sort | propensity of patient-derived ipscs for retinal differentiation: implications for autologous cell replacement |
topic | Enabling Technologies for Cell-Based Clinical Translations |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10267581/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37221451 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/stcltm/szad028 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cookejessicaa propensityofpatientderivedipscsforretinaldifferentiationimplicationsforautologouscellreplacement AT voigtandrewp propensityofpatientderivedipscsforretinaldifferentiationimplicationsforautologouscellreplacement AT collingwoodmichaela propensityofpatientderivedipscsforretinaldifferentiationimplicationsforautologouscellreplacement AT stonenicholase propensityofpatientderivedipscsforretinaldifferentiationimplicationsforautologouscellreplacement AT whitmoresscott propensityofpatientderivedipscsforretinaldifferentiationimplicationsforautologouscellreplacement AT delucaadamp propensityofpatientderivedipscsforretinaldifferentiationimplicationsforautologouscellreplacement AT burnighterinr propensityofpatientderivedipscsforretinaldifferentiationimplicationsforautologouscellreplacement AT anfinsonkristinr propensityofpatientderivedipscsforretinaldifferentiationimplicationsforautologouscellreplacement AT vakulskaschristophera propensityofpatientderivedipscsforretinaldifferentiationimplicationsforautologouscellreplacement AT reutzelaustinj propensityofpatientderivedipscsforretinaldifferentiationimplicationsforautologouscellreplacement AT daggettheathert propensityofpatientderivedipscsforretinaldifferentiationimplicationsforautologouscellreplacement AT andorfjeaneenl propensityofpatientderivedipscsforretinaldifferentiationimplicationsforautologouscellreplacement AT stoneedwinm propensityofpatientderivedipscsforretinaldifferentiationimplicationsforautologouscellreplacement AT mullinsrobertf propensityofpatientderivedipscsforretinaldifferentiationimplicationsforautologouscellreplacement AT tuckerbudda propensityofpatientderivedipscsforretinaldifferentiationimplicationsforautologouscellreplacement |