Cargando…
A framework for assessing selection and misclassification bias in mendelian randomisation studies: an illustrative example between body mass index and covid-19
Mendelian randomisation (MR) studies, which investigate causal effects of exposures on disease, might be biased by sample selection and misclassification if phenotypes are not measured universally with the same definition in all study populations or participants. For example, in MR analyses of effec...
Autores principales: | Clayton, Gemma L, Gonçalves, Ana, Soares, Goulding, Neil, Borges, Maria Carolina, Holmes, Michael V, Davey, George, Smith, Tilling, Kate, Lawlor, Deborah A, Carter, Alice R |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10277657/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37336561 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2022-072148 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Bias in two-sample Mendelian randomization when using heritable covariable-adjusted summary associations
por: Hartwig, Fernando Pires, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Exploring and mitigating potential bias when genetic instrumental variables are associated with multiple non-exposure traits in Mendelian randomization
por: Yang, Qian, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Tools for assessing quality and risk of bias in Mendelian randomization studies: a systematic review
por: Spiga, Francesca, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Bias from questionnaire invitation and response in COVID-19 research: an example using ALSPAC
por: Fernández-Sanlés, Alba, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Interpretation of Mendelian randomization using a single measure of an exposure that varies over time
por: Morris, Tim T, et al.
Publicado: (2022)