Cargando…
The use of feedback in teaching undergraduate dental students: feedback sandwich or Ask-Tell-Ask model?
BACKGROUND: Feedback is regarded as a key component of formative assessment and one of the elements with the greatest impact on students’ academic learning. The present study aimed to evaluate and compare students’ perceptions of the use of two feedback models, namely feedback sandwich and Ask-Tell-...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10288793/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37353763 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03141-5 |
_version_ | 1785062146892103680 |
---|---|
author | Lin, Galvin Sim Siang Tan, Wen Wu Hashim, Hasnah Foong, Chan Choong |
author_facet | Lin, Galvin Sim Siang Tan, Wen Wu Hashim, Hasnah Foong, Chan Choong |
author_sort | Lin, Galvin Sim Siang |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Feedback is regarded as a key component of formative assessment and one of the elements with the greatest impact on students’ academic learning. The present study aimed to evaluate and compare students’ perceptions of the use of two feedback models, namely feedback sandwich and Ask-Tell-Ask (ATA), in teaching dental materials science courses. METHODS: All undergraduate second-year dental students were invited to participate in the dental materials science practical session and were randomly allocated into two groups: Group 1 (feedback) sandwich and Group 2 (ATA). The session began with the teacher giving a short briefing on the commonly used dental materials, followed by a short demonstration of the manipulation of those materials. Students were then allowed to mix and manipulate the materials, and teachers provided feedback accordingly. At the end of the session, 16 close-ended (five-point Likert scales) and an open-ended questionnaire were distributed to students to evaluate their perceptions of the feedback given. Internal reliability of the questionnaire items was evaluated using Cronbach’s alpha. Mean feedback scores were analysed using an independent t-test with ANCOVA for controlling gender and ethnicity. Thematic analysis was used to code the qualitative data. RESULTS: Sixty-nine students participated in the present study with the majority being females (72.5%) and Chinese (79.7%). Cronbach’s alpha analysis suggested removing three Likert-scale items, with the remaining 13 items being accepted. Generally, no significant difference was noted between the two groups (p = 0.197), but three items were found to be significant (p < 0.05), with higher mean scores in the feedback sandwich group. Moreover, no significant difference was noted between the two feedback models (p = 0.325) when controlling gender and ethnicity. The open-ended question showed that students in the feedback sandwich group expressed greater positive perceptions. CONCLUSION: Although students generally had positive perceptions of both feedback models, they tended to favour the feedback sandwich. Neither gender nor ethnicity affected the students’ perceptions of the two feedback models. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10288793 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102887932023-06-24 The use of feedback in teaching undergraduate dental students: feedback sandwich or Ask-Tell-Ask model? Lin, Galvin Sim Siang Tan, Wen Wu Hashim, Hasnah Foong, Chan Choong BMC Oral Health Research BACKGROUND: Feedback is regarded as a key component of formative assessment and one of the elements with the greatest impact on students’ academic learning. The present study aimed to evaluate and compare students’ perceptions of the use of two feedback models, namely feedback sandwich and Ask-Tell-Ask (ATA), in teaching dental materials science courses. METHODS: All undergraduate second-year dental students were invited to participate in the dental materials science practical session and were randomly allocated into two groups: Group 1 (feedback) sandwich and Group 2 (ATA). The session began with the teacher giving a short briefing on the commonly used dental materials, followed by a short demonstration of the manipulation of those materials. Students were then allowed to mix and manipulate the materials, and teachers provided feedback accordingly. At the end of the session, 16 close-ended (five-point Likert scales) and an open-ended questionnaire were distributed to students to evaluate their perceptions of the feedback given. Internal reliability of the questionnaire items was evaluated using Cronbach’s alpha. Mean feedback scores were analysed using an independent t-test with ANCOVA for controlling gender and ethnicity. Thematic analysis was used to code the qualitative data. RESULTS: Sixty-nine students participated in the present study with the majority being females (72.5%) and Chinese (79.7%). Cronbach’s alpha analysis suggested removing three Likert-scale items, with the remaining 13 items being accepted. Generally, no significant difference was noted between the two groups (p = 0.197), but three items were found to be significant (p < 0.05), with higher mean scores in the feedback sandwich group. Moreover, no significant difference was noted between the two feedback models (p = 0.325) when controlling gender and ethnicity. The open-ended question showed that students in the feedback sandwich group expressed greater positive perceptions. CONCLUSION: Although students generally had positive perceptions of both feedback models, they tended to favour the feedback sandwich. Neither gender nor ethnicity affected the students’ perceptions of the two feedback models. BioMed Central 2023-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10288793/ /pubmed/37353763 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03141-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Lin, Galvin Sim Siang Tan, Wen Wu Hashim, Hasnah Foong, Chan Choong The use of feedback in teaching undergraduate dental students: feedback sandwich or Ask-Tell-Ask model? |
title | The use of feedback in teaching undergraduate dental students: feedback sandwich or Ask-Tell-Ask model? |
title_full | The use of feedback in teaching undergraduate dental students: feedback sandwich or Ask-Tell-Ask model? |
title_fullStr | The use of feedback in teaching undergraduate dental students: feedback sandwich or Ask-Tell-Ask model? |
title_full_unstemmed | The use of feedback in teaching undergraduate dental students: feedback sandwich or Ask-Tell-Ask model? |
title_short | The use of feedback in teaching undergraduate dental students: feedback sandwich or Ask-Tell-Ask model? |
title_sort | use of feedback in teaching undergraduate dental students: feedback sandwich or ask-tell-ask model? |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10288793/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37353763 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03141-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lingalvinsimsiang theuseoffeedbackinteachingundergraduatedentalstudentsfeedbacksandwichorasktellaskmodel AT tanwenwu theuseoffeedbackinteachingundergraduatedentalstudentsfeedbacksandwichorasktellaskmodel AT hashimhasnah theuseoffeedbackinteachingundergraduatedentalstudentsfeedbacksandwichorasktellaskmodel AT foongchanchoong theuseoffeedbackinteachingundergraduatedentalstudentsfeedbacksandwichorasktellaskmodel AT lingalvinsimsiang useoffeedbackinteachingundergraduatedentalstudentsfeedbacksandwichorasktellaskmodel AT tanwenwu useoffeedbackinteachingundergraduatedentalstudentsfeedbacksandwichorasktellaskmodel AT hashimhasnah useoffeedbackinteachingundergraduatedentalstudentsfeedbacksandwichorasktellaskmodel AT foongchanchoong useoffeedbackinteachingundergraduatedentalstudentsfeedbacksandwichorasktellaskmodel |