Cargando…
Comparative Methods to Evaluate the Antioxidant Capacity of Propolis: An Attempt to Explain the Differences
Propolis is a natural product produced by bees that contains a complex mixture of compounds, including phenolic compounds and flavonoids. These compounds contribute to its biological activities, such as antioxidant capacity. This study analysed the pollen profile, total phenolic content (TPC), antio...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10303542/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37375400 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules28124847 |
_version_ | 1785065301456453632 |
---|---|
author | Paula, Vanessa B. Estevinho, Letícia M. Cardoso, Susana M. Dias, Luís G. |
author_facet | Paula, Vanessa B. Estevinho, Letícia M. Cardoso, Susana M. Dias, Luís G. |
author_sort | Paula, Vanessa B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Propolis is a natural product produced by bees that contains a complex mixture of compounds, including phenolic compounds and flavonoids. These compounds contribute to its biological activities, such as antioxidant capacity. This study analysed the pollen profile, total phenolic content (TPC), antioxidant properties, and phenolic compound profile of four propolis samples from Portugal. The total phenolic compounds in the samples were determined by six different techniques: four different Folin–Ciocalteu (F-C) methods, spectrophotometry (SPECT), and voltammetry (SWV). Of the six methods, SPECT allowed the highest quantification, while SWV achieved the lowest. The mean TPC values for these methods were 422 ± 98 and 47 ± 11 mg GAE/g sample, respectively. Antioxidant capacity was determined by four different methods: DPPH, FRAP, original ferrocyanide (OFec), and modified ferrocyanide (MFec). The MFec method gave the highest antioxidant capacity for all samples, followed by the DPPH method. The study also investigated the correlation between TPC and antioxidant capacity with the presence of hydroxybenzoic acid (HBA), hydroxycinnamic acid (HCA), and flavonoids (FLAV) in propolis samples. The results showed that the concentrations of specific compounds in propolis samples can significantly impact their antioxidant capacity and TPC quantification. Analysis of the profile of phenolic compounds by the UHPLC-DAD-ESI-MS technique identified chrysin, caffeic acid isoprenyl ester, pinocembrin, galangin, pinobanksin-3-O-acetate, and caffeic acid phenyl ester as the major compounds in the four propolis samples. In conclusion, this study shows the importance of the choice of method for determining TPC and antioxidant activity in samples and the contribution of HBA and HCA content to their quantification. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10303542 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103035422023-06-29 Comparative Methods to Evaluate the Antioxidant Capacity of Propolis: An Attempt to Explain the Differences Paula, Vanessa B. Estevinho, Letícia M. Cardoso, Susana M. Dias, Luís G. Molecules Article Propolis is a natural product produced by bees that contains a complex mixture of compounds, including phenolic compounds and flavonoids. These compounds contribute to its biological activities, such as antioxidant capacity. This study analysed the pollen profile, total phenolic content (TPC), antioxidant properties, and phenolic compound profile of four propolis samples from Portugal. The total phenolic compounds in the samples were determined by six different techniques: four different Folin–Ciocalteu (F-C) methods, spectrophotometry (SPECT), and voltammetry (SWV). Of the six methods, SPECT allowed the highest quantification, while SWV achieved the lowest. The mean TPC values for these methods were 422 ± 98 and 47 ± 11 mg GAE/g sample, respectively. Antioxidant capacity was determined by four different methods: DPPH, FRAP, original ferrocyanide (OFec), and modified ferrocyanide (MFec). The MFec method gave the highest antioxidant capacity for all samples, followed by the DPPH method. The study also investigated the correlation between TPC and antioxidant capacity with the presence of hydroxybenzoic acid (HBA), hydroxycinnamic acid (HCA), and flavonoids (FLAV) in propolis samples. The results showed that the concentrations of specific compounds in propolis samples can significantly impact their antioxidant capacity and TPC quantification. Analysis of the profile of phenolic compounds by the UHPLC-DAD-ESI-MS technique identified chrysin, caffeic acid isoprenyl ester, pinocembrin, galangin, pinobanksin-3-O-acetate, and caffeic acid phenyl ester as the major compounds in the four propolis samples. In conclusion, this study shows the importance of the choice of method for determining TPC and antioxidant activity in samples and the contribution of HBA and HCA content to their quantification. MDPI 2023-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10303542/ /pubmed/37375400 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules28124847 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Paula, Vanessa B. Estevinho, Letícia M. Cardoso, Susana M. Dias, Luís G. Comparative Methods to Evaluate the Antioxidant Capacity of Propolis: An Attempt to Explain the Differences |
title | Comparative Methods to Evaluate the Antioxidant Capacity of Propolis: An Attempt to Explain the Differences |
title_full | Comparative Methods to Evaluate the Antioxidant Capacity of Propolis: An Attempt to Explain the Differences |
title_fullStr | Comparative Methods to Evaluate the Antioxidant Capacity of Propolis: An Attempt to Explain the Differences |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Methods to Evaluate the Antioxidant Capacity of Propolis: An Attempt to Explain the Differences |
title_short | Comparative Methods to Evaluate the Antioxidant Capacity of Propolis: An Attempt to Explain the Differences |
title_sort | comparative methods to evaluate the antioxidant capacity of propolis: an attempt to explain the differences |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10303542/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37375400 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules28124847 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT paulavanessab comparativemethodstoevaluatetheantioxidantcapacityofpropolisanattempttoexplainthedifferences AT estevinholeticiam comparativemethodstoevaluatetheantioxidantcapacityofpropolisanattempttoexplainthedifferences AT cardososusanam comparativemethodstoevaluatetheantioxidantcapacityofpropolisanattempttoexplainthedifferences AT diasluisg comparativemethodstoevaluatetheantioxidantcapacityofpropolisanattempttoexplainthedifferences |