Cargando…

Succinate dehydrogenase variants in paraganglioma: why are B subunit variants ‘bad’?

Mutations that predispose to familial pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma include inherited variants in the four genes (SDHA, SDHB, SDHC and SDHD) encoding subunits of succinate dehydrogenase (SDH), an enzyme of the mitochondrial tricarboxylic acid cycle and complex II of the electron transport chain...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gruber, Lucinda M, Hart, Steven N, Maher III, Louis James
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bioscientifica Ltd 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10305465/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37434649
http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/EO-22-0093
_version_ 1785065740246712320
author Gruber, Lucinda M
Hart, Steven N
Maher III, Louis James
author_facet Gruber, Lucinda M
Hart, Steven N
Maher III, Louis James
author_sort Gruber, Lucinda M
collection PubMed
description Mutations that predispose to familial pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma include inherited variants in the four genes (SDHA, SDHB, SDHC and SDHD) encoding subunits of succinate dehydrogenase (SDH), an enzyme of the mitochondrial tricarboxylic acid cycle and complex II of the electron transport chain. In heterozygous variant carriers, somatic loss of heterozygosity is thought to result in tumorigenic accumulation of succinate and reactive oxygen species. Inexplicably, variants affecting the SDHB subunit predict worse clinical outcomes. Why? Here we consider two hypotheses. First, relative to SDH A, C and D subunits, the small SDHB subunit might be more intrinsically ‘fragile’ to missense mutations because of its relatively large fraction of amino acids contacting prosthetic groups and other SDH subunits. We show evidence that supports this hypothesis. Second, the natural pool of human SDHB variants might, by chance, be biased toward severe truncating variants and missense variants causing more disruptive amino acid substitutions. We tested this hypothesis by creating a database of known SDH variants and predicting their biochemical severities. Our data suggest that natural SDHB variants are more pathogenic. It is unclear if this bias is sufficient to explain clinical data. Other explanations include the possibility that SDH subcomplexes remaining after SDHB loss have unique tumorigenic gain-of-function characteristics, and/or that SDHB may have additional unknown tumor-suppressor functions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10305465
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Bioscientifica Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103054652023-07-11 Succinate dehydrogenase variants in paraganglioma: why are B subunit variants ‘bad’? Gruber, Lucinda M Hart, Steven N Maher III, Louis James Endocr Oncol Research Mutations that predispose to familial pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma include inherited variants in the four genes (SDHA, SDHB, SDHC and SDHD) encoding subunits of succinate dehydrogenase (SDH), an enzyme of the mitochondrial tricarboxylic acid cycle and complex II of the electron transport chain. In heterozygous variant carriers, somatic loss of heterozygosity is thought to result in tumorigenic accumulation of succinate and reactive oxygen species. Inexplicably, variants affecting the SDHB subunit predict worse clinical outcomes. Why? Here we consider two hypotheses. First, relative to SDH A, C and D subunits, the small SDHB subunit might be more intrinsically ‘fragile’ to missense mutations because of its relatively large fraction of amino acids contacting prosthetic groups and other SDH subunits. We show evidence that supports this hypothesis. Second, the natural pool of human SDHB variants might, by chance, be biased toward severe truncating variants and missense variants causing more disruptive amino acid substitutions. We tested this hypothesis by creating a database of known SDH variants and predicting their biochemical severities. Our data suggest that natural SDHB variants are more pathogenic. It is unclear if this bias is sufficient to explain clinical data. Other explanations include the possibility that SDH subcomplexes remaining after SDHB loss have unique tumorigenic gain-of-function characteristics, and/or that SDHB may have additional unknown tumor-suppressor functions. Bioscientifica Ltd 2023-02-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10305465/ /pubmed/37434649 http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/EO-22-0093 Text en © the author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
spellingShingle Research
Gruber, Lucinda M
Hart, Steven N
Maher III, Louis James
Succinate dehydrogenase variants in paraganglioma: why are B subunit variants ‘bad’?
title Succinate dehydrogenase variants in paraganglioma: why are B subunit variants ‘bad’?
title_full Succinate dehydrogenase variants in paraganglioma: why are B subunit variants ‘bad’?
title_fullStr Succinate dehydrogenase variants in paraganglioma: why are B subunit variants ‘bad’?
title_full_unstemmed Succinate dehydrogenase variants in paraganglioma: why are B subunit variants ‘bad’?
title_short Succinate dehydrogenase variants in paraganglioma: why are B subunit variants ‘bad’?
title_sort succinate dehydrogenase variants in paraganglioma: why are b subunit variants ‘bad’?
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10305465/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37434649
http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/EO-22-0093
work_keys_str_mv AT gruberlucindam succinatedehydrogenasevariantsinparagangliomawhyarebsubunitvariantsbad
AT hartstevenn succinatedehydrogenasevariantsinparagangliomawhyarebsubunitvariantsbad
AT maheriiilouisjames succinatedehydrogenasevariantsinparagangliomawhyarebsubunitvariantsbad