Cargando…

A survey of CIN measures across mechanistic models

Chromosomal instability (CIN) is the persistent reshuffling of cancer karyotypes via chromosome mis-segregation during cell division. In cancer, CIN exists at varying levels that have differential effects on tumor progression. However, mis-segregation rates remain challenging to assess in human canc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lynch, Andrew R., Bradford, Shermineh, Zhou, Amber S., Oxendine, Kim, Henderson, Les, Horner, Vanessa L., Weaver, Beth A., Burkard, Mark E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10312700/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37398147
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.06.15.544840
_version_ 1785066972240674816
author Lynch, Andrew R.
Bradford, Shermineh
Zhou, Amber S.
Oxendine, Kim
Henderson, Les
Horner, Vanessa L.
Weaver, Beth A.
Burkard, Mark E.
author_facet Lynch, Andrew R.
Bradford, Shermineh
Zhou, Amber S.
Oxendine, Kim
Henderson, Les
Horner, Vanessa L.
Weaver, Beth A.
Burkard, Mark E.
author_sort Lynch, Andrew R.
collection PubMed
description Chromosomal instability (CIN) is the persistent reshuffling of cancer karyotypes via chromosome mis-segregation during cell division. In cancer, CIN exists at varying levels that have differential effects on tumor progression. However, mis-segregation rates remain challenging to assess in human cancer despite an array of available measures. We evaluated measures of CIN by comparing quantitative methods using specific, inducible phenotypic CIN models of chromosome bridges, pseudobipolar spindles, multipolar spindles, and polar chromosomes. For each, we measured CIN fixed and timelapse fluorescence microscopy, chromosome spreads, 6-centromere FISH, bulk transcriptomics, and single cell DNA sequencing (scDNAseq). As expected, microscopy of tumor cells in live and fixed samples correlated well (R=0.77; p<0.01) and sensitively detect CIN. Cytogenetics approaches include chromosome spreads and 6-centromere FISH, which also correlate well (R=0.77; p<0.01) but had limited sensitivity for lower rates of CIN. Bulk genomic DNA signatures and bulk transcriptomic scores, CIN70 and HET70, did not detect CIN. By contrast, single-cell DNA sequencing (scDNAseq) detects CIN with high sensitivity, and correlates very well with imaging methods (R=0.83; p<0.01). In summary, single-cell methods such as imaging, cytogenetics, and scDNAseq can measure CIN, with the latter being the most comprehensive method accessible to clinical samples. To facilitate comparison of CIN rates between phenotypes and methods, we propose a standardized unit of CIN: Mis-segregations per Diploid Division (MDD). This systematic analysis of common CIN measures highlights the superiority of single-cell methods and provides guidance for measuring CIN in the clinical setting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10312700
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103127002023-07-01 A survey of CIN measures across mechanistic models Lynch, Andrew R. Bradford, Shermineh Zhou, Amber S. Oxendine, Kim Henderson, Les Horner, Vanessa L. Weaver, Beth A. Burkard, Mark E. bioRxiv Article Chromosomal instability (CIN) is the persistent reshuffling of cancer karyotypes via chromosome mis-segregation during cell division. In cancer, CIN exists at varying levels that have differential effects on tumor progression. However, mis-segregation rates remain challenging to assess in human cancer despite an array of available measures. We evaluated measures of CIN by comparing quantitative methods using specific, inducible phenotypic CIN models of chromosome bridges, pseudobipolar spindles, multipolar spindles, and polar chromosomes. For each, we measured CIN fixed and timelapse fluorescence microscopy, chromosome spreads, 6-centromere FISH, bulk transcriptomics, and single cell DNA sequencing (scDNAseq). As expected, microscopy of tumor cells in live and fixed samples correlated well (R=0.77; p<0.01) and sensitively detect CIN. Cytogenetics approaches include chromosome spreads and 6-centromere FISH, which also correlate well (R=0.77; p<0.01) but had limited sensitivity for lower rates of CIN. Bulk genomic DNA signatures and bulk transcriptomic scores, CIN70 and HET70, did not detect CIN. By contrast, single-cell DNA sequencing (scDNAseq) detects CIN with high sensitivity, and correlates very well with imaging methods (R=0.83; p<0.01). In summary, single-cell methods such as imaging, cytogenetics, and scDNAseq can measure CIN, with the latter being the most comprehensive method accessible to clinical samples. To facilitate comparison of CIN rates between phenotypes and methods, we propose a standardized unit of CIN: Mis-segregations per Diploid Division (MDD). This systematic analysis of common CIN measures highlights the superiority of single-cell methods and provides guidance for measuring CIN in the clinical setting. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory 2023-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10312700/ /pubmed/37398147 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.06.15.544840 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which allows reusers to copy and distribute the material in any medium or format in unadapted form only, for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.
spellingShingle Article
Lynch, Andrew R.
Bradford, Shermineh
Zhou, Amber S.
Oxendine, Kim
Henderson, Les
Horner, Vanessa L.
Weaver, Beth A.
Burkard, Mark E.
A survey of CIN measures across mechanistic models
title A survey of CIN measures across mechanistic models
title_full A survey of CIN measures across mechanistic models
title_fullStr A survey of CIN measures across mechanistic models
title_full_unstemmed A survey of CIN measures across mechanistic models
title_short A survey of CIN measures across mechanistic models
title_sort survey of cin measures across mechanistic models
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10312700/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37398147
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.06.15.544840
work_keys_str_mv AT lynchandrewr asurveyofcinmeasuresacrossmechanisticmodels
AT bradfordshermineh asurveyofcinmeasuresacrossmechanisticmodels
AT zhouambers asurveyofcinmeasuresacrossmechanisticmodels
AT oxendinekim asurveyofcinmeasuresacrossmechanisticmodels
AT hendersonles asurveyofcinmeasuresacrossmechanisticmodels
AT hornervanessal asurveyofcinmeasuresacrossmechanisticmodels
AT weaverbetha asurveyofcinmeasuresacrossmechanisticmodels
AT burkardmarke asurveyofcinmeasuresacrossmechanisticmodels
AT lynchandrewr surveyofcinmeasuresacrossmechanisticmodels
AT bradfordshermineh surveyofcinmeasuresacrossmechanisticmodels
AT zhouambers surveyofcinmeasuresacrossmechanisticmodels
AT oxendinekim surveyofcinmeasuresacrossmechanisticmodels
AT hendersonles surveyofcinmeasuresacrossmechanisticmodels
AT hornervanessal surveyofcinmeasuresacrossmechanisticmodels
AT weaverbetha surveyofcinmeasuresacrossmechanisticmodels
AT burkardmarke surveyofcinmeasuresacrossmechanisticmodels