Cargando…
Comparison of a portable Vis-NIR hyperspectral imaging and a snapscan SWIR hyperspectral imaging for evaluation of meat authenticity
The performance of visible-near infrared hyperspectral imaging (Vis-NIR-HSI) (400–1000 nm) and shortwave infrared hyperspectral imaging (SWIR-HSI) (1116–1670 nm) combined with different classification and regression (linear and non-linear) multivariate methods were assessed for meat authentication....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10314175/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37397218 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fochx.2023.100667 |
Sumario: | The performance of visible-near infrared hyperspectral imaging (Vis-NIR-HSI) (400–1000 nm) and shortwave infrared hyperspectral imaging (SWIR-HSI) (1116–1670 nm) combined with different classification and regression (linear and non-linear) multivariate methods were assessed for meat authentication. In Vis-NIR-HSI, total accuracies in the prediction set for SVM and ANN-BPN (the best classification models) were 96 and 94 % surpassing the performance of SWIR-HSI with 88 and 89 % accuracy, respectively. In Vis-NIR-HSI, the best-obtained coefficient of determinations for the prediction set (R(2)(p)) were 0.99, 0.88, and 0.99 with root mean square error in prediction (RMSEP) of 9, 24 and 4 (%w/w) for pork in beef, pork in lamb and pork in chicken, respectively. In SWIR-HSI, the best-obtained R(2)(p) were 0.86, 0.77, and 0.89 with RMSEP of 16, 23 and 15 (%w/w) for pork in beef, pork in lamb and pork in chicken, respectively. The results ascertain that Vis-NIR-HSI coupled with multivariate data analysis has better performance rather than SWIR-HIS. |
---|