Cargando…
Comparison of a portable Vis-NIR hyperspectral imaging and a snapscan SWIR hyperspectral imaging for evaluation of meat authenticity
The performance of visible-near infrared hyperspectral imaging (Vis-NIR-HSI) (400–1000 nm) and shortwave infrared hyperspectral imaging (SWIR-HSI) (1116–1670 nm) combined with different classification and regression (linear and non-linear) multivariate methods were assessed for meat authentication....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10314175/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37397218 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fochx.2023.100667 |
_version_ | 1785067266265579520 |
---|---|
author | Dashti, Abolfazl Müller-Maatsch, Judith Roetgerink, Emma Wijtten, Michiel Weesepoel, Yannick Parastar, Hadi Yazdanpanah, Hassan |
author_facet | Dashti, Abolfazl Müller-Maatsch, Judith Roetgerink, Emma Wijtten, Michiel Weesepoel, Yannick Parastar, Hadi Yazdanpanah, Hassan |
author_sort | Dashti, Abolfazl |
collection | PubMed |
description | The performance of visible-near infrared hyperspectral imaging (Vis-NIR-HSI) (400–1000 nm) and shortwave infrared hyperspectral imaging (SWIR-HSI) (1116–1670 nm) combined with different classification and regression (linear and non-linear) multivariate methods were assessed for meat authentication. In Vis-NIR-HSI, total accuracies in the prediction set for SVM and ANN-BPN (the best classification models) were 96 and 94 % surpassing the performance of SWIR-HSI with 88 and 89 % accuracy, respectively. In Vis-NIR-HSI, the best-obtained coefficient of determinations for the prediction set (R(2)(p)) were 0.99, 0.88, and 0.99 with root mean square error in prediction (RMSEP) of 9, 24 and 4 (%w/w) for pork in beef, pork in lamb and pork in chicken, respectively. In SWIR-HSI, the best-obtained R(2)(p) were 0.86, 0.77, and 0.89 with RMSEP of 16, 23 and 15 (%w/w) for pork in beef, pork in lamb and pork in chicken, respectively. The results ascertain that Vis-NIR-HSI coupled with multivariate data analysis has better performance rather than SWIR-HIS. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10314175 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103141752023-07-02 Comparison of a portable Vis-NIR hyperspectral imaging and a snapscan SWIR hyperspectral imaging for evaluation of meat authenticity Dashti, Abolfazl Müller-Maatsch, Judith Roetgerink, Emma Wijtten, Michiel Weesepoel, Yannick Parastar, Hadi Yazdanpanah, Hassan Food Chem X Article(s) from the Special Issue on Food Authentication and Origin by Dr. Yong Fang and Dr. Vural Gökmen The performance of visible-near infrared hyperspectral imaging (Vis-NIR-HSI) (400–1000 nm) and shortwave infrared hyperspectral imaging (SWIR-HSI) (1116–1670 nm) combined with different classification and regression (linear and non-linear) multivariate methods were assessed for meat authentication. In Vis-NIR-HSI, total accuracies in the prediction set for SVM and ANN-BPN (the best classification models) were 96 and 94 % surpassing the performance of SWIR-HSI with 88 and 89 % accuracy, respectively. In Vis-NIR-HSI, the best-obtained coefficient of determinations for the prediction set (R(2)(p)) were 0.99, 0.88, and 0.99 with root mean square error in prediction (RMSEP) of 9, 24 and 4 (%w/w) for pork in beef, pork in lamb and pork in chicken, respectively. In SWIR-HSI, the best-obtained R(2)(p) were 0.86, 0.77, and 0.89 with RMSEP of 16, 23 and 15 (%w/w) for pork in beef, pork in lamb and pork in chicken, respectively. The results ascertain that Vis-NIR-HSI coupled with multivariate data analysis has better performance rather than SWIR-HIS. Elsevier 2023-04-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10314175/ /pubmed/37397218 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fochx.2023.100667 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article(s) from the Special Issue on Food Authentication and Origin by Dr. Yong Fang and Dr. Vural Gökmen Dashti, Abolfazl Müller-Maatsch, Judith Roetgerink, Emma Wijtten, Michiel Weesepoel, Yannick Parastar, Hadi Yazdanpanah, Hassan Comparison of a portable Vis-NIR hyperspectral imaging and a snapscan SWIR hyperspectral imaging for evaluation of meat authenticity |
title | Comparison of a portable Vis-NIR hyperspectral imaging and a snapscan SWIR hyperspectral imaging for evaluation of meat authenticity |
title_full | Comparison of a portable Vis-NIR hyperspectral imaging and a snapscan SWIR hyperspectral imaging for evaluation of meat authenticity |
title_fullStr | Comparison of a portable Vis-NIR hyperspectral imaging and a snapscan SWIR hyperspectral imaging for evaluation of meat authenticity |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of a portable Vis-NIR hyperspectral imaging and a snapscan SWIR hyperspectral imaging for evaluation of meat authenticity |
title_short | Comparison of a portable Vis-NIR hyperspectral imaging and a snapscan SWIR hyperspectral imaging for evaluation of meat authenticity |
title_sort | comparison of a portable vis-nir hyperspectral imaging and a snapscan swir hyperspectral imaging for evaluation of meat authenticity |
topic | Article(s) from the Special Issue on Food Authentication and Origin by Dr. Yong Fang and Dr. Vural Gökmen |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10314175/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37397218 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fochx.2023.100667 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dashtiabolfazl comparisonofaportablevisnirhyperspectralimagingandasnapscanswirhyperspectralimagingforevaluationofmeatauthenticity AT mullermaatschjudith comparisonofaportablevisnirhyperspectralimagingandasnapscanswirhyperspectralimagingforevaluationofmeatauthenticity AT roetgerinkemma comparisonofaportablevisnirhyperspectralimagingandasnapscanswirhyperspectralimagingforevaluationofmeatauthenticity AT wijttenmichiel comparisonofaportablevisnirhyperspectralimagingandasnapscanswirhyperspectralimagingforevaluationofmeatauthenticity AT weesepoelyannick comparisonofaportablevisnirhyperspectralimagingandasnapscanswirhyperspectralimagingforevaluationofmeatauthenticity AT parastarhadi comparisonofaportablevisnirhyperspectralimagingandasnapscanswirhyperspectralimagingforevaluationofmeatauthenticity AT yazdanpanahhassan comparisonofaportablevisnirhyperspectralimagingandasnapscanswirhyperspectralimagingforevaluationofmeatauthenticity |