Cargando…
Exchangeability of Measures of Association Before and After Exposure Status Is Flipped: Its Relationship With Confounding in the Counterfactual Model
BACKGROUND: The counterfactual definition of confounding is often explained in the context of exchangeability between the exposed and unexposed groups. One recent approach is to examine whether the measures of association (eg, associational risk difference) are exchangeable when exposure status is f...
Autores principales: | Suzuki, Etsuji, Yamamoto, Michio, Yamamoto, Eiji |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Japan Epidemiological Association
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10319525/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35067497 http://dx.doi.org/10.2188/jea.JE20210352 |
Ejemplares similares
-
A counterfactual approach to bias and effect modification in terms of response types
por: Suzuki, Etsuji, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
A typology of four notions of confounding in epidemiology
por: Suzuki, Etsuji, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
On the collapsibility of measures of effect in the counterfactual causal framework
por: Huitfeldt, Anders, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Clarifying the Use of Aggregated Exposures in Multilevel Models: Self-Included vs. Self-Excluded Measures
por: Suzuki, Etsuji, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Identifiability, exchangeability and confounding revisited
por: Greenland, Sander, et al.
Publicado: (2009)