Cargando…

Invalidity of, and alternative to, the linear quadratic model as a predictive model for postirradiation cell survival

The linear quadratic (LQ) model has been the dominant tool in preclinical radiobiological modeling of cell survival as a function of dose. However, as a second‐order polynomial approximation, it suffers from two well‐known pitfalls: nonmonotonic behavior and poor extrapolation. This study examined t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Li, Heng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10323099/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36946242
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cas.15796
_version_ 1785068895309135872
author Li, Heng
author_facet Li, Heng
author_sort Li, Heng
collection PubMed
description The linear quadratic (LQ) model has been the dominant tool in preclinical radiobiological modeling of cell survival as a function of dose. However, as a second‐order polynomial approximation, it suffers from two well‐known pitfalls: nonmonotonic behavior and poor extrapolation. This study examined the raw data of 253 sets of photons and 943 sets of the ion beam from the Particle Irradiation Data Ensemble (PIDE) project to understand how often the LQ model could result in a negative β, which would give unrealistic predictions. Additionally, the predictive performance of the LQ model, the power model, and the linear model's predictive performance was studied using leave‐one‐out cross‐validation (LOOCV) and twofold cross‐validation. It was found that, when fitted to the LQ model, 7.5% of the photon and 29.8% of the ion beam dose–response data would result in negative β, compared to 0.77% and 2.0%, respectively, reported in published works. The LQ model performed poorly in LOOCV compared to the alternative power model, and performed the worst among the three models in twofold cross‐validation. The LQ model leads to unrealistic parameters, which are vastly under‐reported in published studies, and performs poorly in standard cross‐validation tests. Therefore, the LQ model is not a valid predictive dose–response model for cell survival. Alternative models need to be investigated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10323099
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103230992023-07-07 Invalidity of, and alternative to, the linear quadratic model as a predictive model for postirradiation cell survival Li, Heng Cancer Sci ORIGINAL ARTICLES The linear quadratic (LQ) model has been the dominant tool in preclinical radiobiological modeling of cell survival as a function of dose. However, as a second‐order polynomial approximation, it suffers from two well‐known pitfalls: nonmonotonic behavior and poor extrapolation. This study examined the raw data of 253 sets of photons and 943 sets of the ion beam from the Particle Irradiation Data Ensemble (PIDE) project to understand how often the LQ model could result in a negative β, which would give unrealistic predictions. Additionally, the predictive performance of the LQ model, the power model, and the linear model's predictive performance was studied using leave‐one‐out cross‐validation (LOOCV) and twofold cross‐validation. It was found that, when fitted to the LQ model, 7.5% of the photon and 29.8% of the ion beam dose–response data would result in negative β, compared to 0.77% and 2.0%, respectively, reported in published works. The LQ model performed poorly in LOOCV compared to the alternative power model, and performed the worst among the three models in twofold cross‐validation. The LQ model leads to unrealistic parameters, which are vastly under‐reported in published studies, and performs poorly in standard cross‐validation tests. Therefore, the LQ model is not a valid predictive dose–response model for cell survival. Alternative models need to be investigated. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10323099/ /pubmed/36946242 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cas.15796 Text en © 2023 The Author. Cancer Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle ORIGINAL ARTICLES
Li, Heng
Invalidity of, and alternative to, the linear quadratic model as a predictive model for postirradiation cell survival
title Invalidity of, and alternative to, the linear quadratic model as a predictive model for postirradiation cell survival
title_full Invalidity of, and alternative to, the linear quadratic model as a predictive model for postirradiation cell survival
title_fullStr Invalidity of, and alternative to, the linear quadratic model as a predictive model for postirradiation cell survival
title_full_unstemmed Invalidity of, and alternative to, the linear quadratic model as a predictive model for postirradiation cell survival
title_short Invalidity of, and alternative to, the linear quadratic model as a predictive model for postirradiation cell survival
title_sort invalidity of, and alternative to, the linear quadratic model as a predictive model for postirradiation cell survival
topic ORIGINAL ARTICLES
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10323099/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36946242
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cas.15796
work_keys_str_mv AT liheng invalidityofandalternativetothelinearquadraticmodelasapredictivemodelforpostirradiationcellsurvival