Cargando…
Comparative Saturation Binding Analysis of (64)Cu-Labeled Somatostatin Analogues Using Cell Homogenates and Intact Cells
[Image: see text] The development of novel ligands for G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) typically entails the characterization of their binding affinity, which is often performed with radioligands in a competition or saturation binding assay format. Since GPCRs are transmembrane proteins, recepto...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Chemical Society
2023
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10324063/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37426243 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c02755 |
_version_ | 1785069068398624768 |
---|---|
author | Ullrich, Martin Brandt, Florian Löser, Reik Pietzsch, Jens Wodtke, Robert |
author_facet | Ullrich, Martin Brandt, Florian Löser, Reik Pietzsch, Jens Wodtke, Robert |
author_sort | Ullrich, Martin |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Image: see text] The development of novel ligands for G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) typically entails the characterization of their binding affinity, which is often performed with radioligands in a competition or saturation binding assay format. Since GPCRs are transmembrane proteins, receptor samples for binding assays are prepared from tissue sections, cell membranes, cell homogenates, or intact cells. As part of our investigations on modulating the pharmacokinetics of radiolabeled peptides for improved theranostic targeting of neuroendocrine tumors with a high abundance of the somatostatin receptor sub-type 2 (SST(2)), we characterized a series of (64)Cu-labeled [Tyr(3)]octreotate (TATE) derivatives in vitro in saturation binding assays. Herein, we report on the SST(2) binding parameters measured toward intact mouse pheochromocytoma cells and corresponding cell homogenates and discuss the observed differences taking the physiology of SST(2) and GPCRs in general into account. Furthermore, we point out method-specific advantages and limitations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10324063 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | American Chemical Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103240632023-07-07 Comparative Saturation Binding Analysis of (64)Cu-Labeled Somatostatin Analogues Using Cell Homogenates and Intact Cells Ullrich, Martin Brandt, Florian Löser, Reik Pietzsch, Jens Wodtke, Robert ACS Omega [Image: see text] The development of novel ligands for G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) typically entails the characterization of their binding affinity, which is often performed with radioligands in a competition or saturation binding assay format. Since GPCRs are transmembrane proteins, receptor samples for binding assays are prepared from tissue sections, cell membranes, cell homogenates, or intact cells. As part of our investigations on modulating the pharmacokinetics of radiolabeled peptides for improved theranostic targeting of neuroendocrine tumors with a high abundance of the somatostatin receptor sub-type 2 (SST(2)), we characterized a series of (64)Cu-labeled [Tyr(3)]octreotate (TATE) derivatives in vitro in saturation binding assays. Herein, we report on the SST(2) binding parameters measured toward intact mouse pheochromocytoma cells and corresponding cell homogenates and discuss the observed differences taking the physiology of SST(2) and GPCRs in general into account. Furthermore, we point out method-specific advantages and limitations. American Chemical Society 2023-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10324063/ /pubmed/37426243 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c02755 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Permits the broadest form of re-use including for commercial purposes, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Ullrich, Martin Brandt, Florian Löser, Reik Pietzsch, Jens Wodtke, Robert Comparative Saturation Binding Analysis of (64)Cu-Labeled Somatostatin Analogues Using Cell Homogenates and Intact Cells |
title | Comparative Saturation Binding Analysis of (64)Cu-Labeled
Somatostatin Analogues Using Cell Homogenates and Intact
Cells |
title_full | Comparative Saturation Binding Analysis of (64)Cu-Labeled
Somatostatin Analogues Using Cell Homogenates and Intact
Cells |
title_fullStr | Comparative Saturation Binding Analysis of (64)Cu-Labeled
Somatostatin Analogues Using Cell Homogenates and Intact
Cells |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Saturation Binding Analysis of (64)Cu-Labeled
Somatostatin Analogues Using Cell Homogenates and Intact
Cells |
title_short | Comparative Saturation Binding Analysis of (64)Cu-Labeled
Somatostatin Analogues Using Cell Homogenates and Intact
Cells |
title_sort | comparative saturation binding analysis of (64)cu-labeled
somatostatin analogues using cell homogenates and intact
cells |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10324063/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37426243 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c02755 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ullrichmartin comparativesaturationbindinganalysisof64culabeledsomatostatinanaloguesusingcellhomogenatesandintactcells AT brandtflorian comparativesaturationbindinganalysisof64culabeledsomatostatinanaloguesusingcellhomogenatesandintactcells AT loserreik comparativesaturationbindinganalysisof64culabeledsomatostatinanaloguesusingcellhomogenatesandintactcells AT pietzschjens comparativesaturationbindinganalysisof64culabeledsomatostatinanaloguesusingcellhomogenatesandintactcells AT wodtkerobert comparativesaturationbindinganalysisof64culabeledsomatostatinanaloguesusingcellhomogenatesandintactcells |