Cargando…

Comparative Saturation Binding Analysis of (64)Cu-Labeled Somatostatin Analogues Using Cell Homogenates and Intact Cells

[Image: see text] The development of novel ligands for G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) typically entails the characterization of their binding affinity, which is often performed with radioligands in a competition or saturation binding assay format. Since GPCRs are transmembrane proteins, recepto...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ullrich, Martin, Brandt, Florian, Löser, Reik, Pietzsch, Jens, Wodtke, Robert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2023
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10324063/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37426243
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c02755
_version_ 1785069068398624768
author Ullrich, Martin
Brandt, Florian
Löser, Reik
Pietzsch, Jens
Wodtke, Robert
author_facet Ullrich, Martin
Brandt, Florian
Löser, Reik
Pietzsch, Jens
Wodtke, Robert
author_sort Ullrich, Martin
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] The development of novel ligands for G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) typically entails the characterization of their binding affinity, which is often performed with radioligands in a competition or saturation binding assay format. Since GPCRs are transmembrane proteins, receptor samples for binding assays are prepared from tissue sections, cell membranes, cell homogenates, or intact cells. As part of our investigations on modulating the pharmacokinetics of radiolabeled peptides for improved theranostic targeting of neuroendocrine tumors with a high abundance of the somatostatin receptor sub-type 2 (SST(2)), we characterized a series of (64)Cu-labeled [Tyr(3)]octreotate (TATE) derivatives in vitro in saturation binding assays. Herein, we report on the SST(2) binding parameters measured toward intact mouse pheochromocytoma cells and corresponding cell homogenates and discuss the observed differences taking the physiology of SST(2) and GPCRs in general into account. Furthermore, we point out method-specific advantages and limitations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10324063
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103240632023-07-07 Comparative Saturation Binding Analysis of (64)Cu-Labeled Somatostatin Analogues Using Cell Homogenates and Intact Cells Ullrich, Martin Brandt, Florian Löser, Reik Pietzsch, Jens Wodtke, Robert ACS Omega [Image: see text] The development of novel ligands for G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) typically entails the characterization of their binding affinity, which is often performed with radioligands in a competition or saturation binding assay format. Since GPCRs are transmembrane proteins, receptor samples for binding assays are prepared from tissue sections, cell membranes, cell homogenates, or intact cells. As part of our investigations on modulating the pharmacokinetics of radiolabeled peptides for improved theranostic targeting of neuroendocrine tumors with a high abundance of the somatostatin receptor sub-type 2 (SST(2)), we characterized a series of (64)Cu-labeled [Tyr(3)]octreotate (TATE) derivatives in vitro in saturation binding assays. Herein, we report on the SST(2) binding parameters measured toward intact mouse pheochromocytoma cells and corresponding cell homogenates and discuss the observed differences taking the physiology of SST(2) and GPCRs in general into account. Furthermore, we point out method-specific advantages and limitations. American Chemical Society 2023-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10324063/ /pubmed/37426243 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c02755 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Permits the broadest form of re-use including for commercial purposes, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Ullrich, Martin
Brandt, Florian
Löser, Reik
Pietzsch, Jens
Wodtke, Robert
Comparative Saturation Binding Analysis of (64)Cu-Labeled Somatostatin Analogues Using Cell Homogenates and Intact Cells
title Comparative Saturation Binding Analysis of (64)Cu-Labeled Somatostatin Analogues Using Cell Homogenates and Intact Cells
title_full Comparative Saturation Binding Analysis of (64)Cu-Labeled Somatostatin Analogues Using Cell Homogenates and Intact Cells
title_fullStr Comparative Saturation Binding Analysis of (64)Cu-Labeled Somatostatin Analogues Using Cell Homogenates and Intact Cells
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Saturation Binding Analysis of (64)Cu-Labeled Somatostatin Analogues Using Cell Homogenates and Intact Cells
title_short Comparative Saturation Binding Analysis of (64)Cu-Labeled Somatostatin Analogues Using Cell Homogenates and Intact Cells
title_sort comparative saturation binding analysis of (64)cu-labeled somatostatin analogues using cell homogenates and intact cells
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10324063/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37426243
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c02755
work_keys_str_mv AT ullrichmartin comparativesaturationbindinganalysisof64culabeledsomatostatinanaloguesusingcellhomogenatesandintactcells
AT brandtflorian comparativesaturationbindinganalysisof64culabeledsomatostatinanaloguesusingcellhomogenatesandintactcells
AT loserreik comparativesaturationbindinganalysisof64culabeledsomatostatinanaloguesusingcellhomogenatesandintactcells
AT pietzschjens comparativesaturationbindinganalysisof64culabeledsomatostatinanaloguesusingcellhomogenatesandintactcells
AT wodtkerobert comparativesaturationbindinganalysisof64culabeledsomatostatinanaloguesusingcellhomogenatesandintactcells