Cargando…

Dyad learning versus individual learning under medical simulation conditions: a systematic review

Background: Dyad learning is a two-person learning dynamic in which one student observes the other performing tasks, with their roles then being reversed such that both students experience the observer and the performer role. The efficacy of dyad learning has been tested in medical education context...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ding, Jack, Xiao, Xin, Biagi, Shanon, Varkey, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: F1000 Research Limited 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10331849/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37435430
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/mep.19285.1
_version_ 1785070330925023232
author Ding, Jack
Xiao, Xin
Biagi, Shanon
Varkey, Thomas
author_facet Ding, Jack
Xiao, Xin
Biagi, Shanon
Varkey, Thomas
author_sort Ding, Jack
collection PubMed
description Background: Dyad learning is a two-person learning dynamic in which one student observes the other performing tasks, with their roles then being reversed such that both students experience the observer and the performer role. The efficacy of dyad learning has been tested in medical education contexts, such as in medical simulation. To our knowledge, this is the first systematic review that has evaluated the efficacy of dyad learning in a medical simulation context. Methods: PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library databases were searched in September 2021 and January 2022. Prospective studies of randomized design that compared dyad learning to a single medical student or physician learning in a medical simulation were included. Non-English language studies, secondary literature papers, non-human based studies, and papers that were published prior to 2000 were excluded. The methodological quality of these studies was assessed using the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MERSQI). The Kirkpatrick model was used to conceptualize study outcomes. Results: The identified papers included eight studies from four countries that totaled 475 participants. Students reported positively on their experiences as dyads, especially regarding the social aspects of it. Studies showed non-inferior learning outcomes for dyads. As most studies were one or two days long, there is limited evidence that this non-inferiority extends to longer term training modules. There is some evidence to suggest that dyad learning outcomes may be replicable in a clinical context following simulation training. Conclusions: Dyad learning in medical simulation is a pleasant experience for students and may be as effective as conventional learning. These findings set the foundation for future studies of longer duration, which is needed to determine the efficacy of dyad learning in lengthier curriculums and long-term knowledge retention. While cost-reduction is an implied benefit, studies that explicate cost reduction are needed to formalize this.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10331849
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher F1000 Research Limited
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103318492023-07-11 Dyad learning versus individual learning under medical simulation conditions: a systematic review Ding, Jack Xiao, Xin Biagi, Shanon Varkey, Thomas MedEdPublish (2016) Systematic Review Background: Dyad learning is a two-person learning dynamic in which one student observes the other performing tasks, with their roles then being reversed such that both students experience the observer and the performer role. The efficacy of dyad learning has been tested in medical education contexts, such as in medical simulation. To our knowledge, this is the first systematic review that has evaluated the efficacy of dyad learning in a medical simulation context. Methods: PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library databases were searched in September 2021 and January 2022. Prospective studies of randomized design that compared dyad learning to a single medical student or physician learning in a medical simulation were included. Non-English language studies, secondary literature papers, non-human based studies, and papers that were published prior to 2000 were excluded. The methodological quality of these studies was assessed using the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MERSQI). The Kirkpatrick model was used to conceptualize study outcomes. Results: The identified papers included eight studies from four countries that totaled 475 participants. Students reported positively on their experiences as dyads, especially regarding the social aspects of it. Studies showed non-inferior learning outcomes for dyads. As most studies were one or two days long, there is limited evidence that this non-inferiority extends to longer term training modules. There is some evidence to suggest that dyad learning outcomes may be replicable in a clinical context following simulation training. Conclusions: Dyad learning in medical simulation is a pleasant experience for students and may be as effective as conventional learning. These findings set the foundation for future studies of longer duration, which is needed to determine the efficacy of dyad learning in lengthier curriculums and long-term knowledge retention. While cost-reduction is an implied benefit, studies that explicate cost reduction are needed to formalize this. F1000 Research Limited 2022-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10331849/ /pubmed/37435430 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/mep.19285.1 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Ding J et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Ding, Jack
Xiao, Xin
Biagi, Shanon
Varkey, Thomas
Dyad learning versus individual learning under medical simulation conditions: a systematic review
title Dyad learning versus individual learning under medical simulation conditions: a systematic review
title_full Dyad learning versus individual learning under medical simulation conditions: a systematic review
title_fullStr Dyad learning versus individual learning under medical simulation conditions: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Dyad learning versus individual learning under medical simulation conditions: a systematic review
title_short Dyad learning versus individual learning under medical simulation conditions: a systematic review
title_sort dyad learning versus individual learning under medical simulation conditions: a systematic review
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10331849/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37435430
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/mep.19285.1
work_keys_str_mv AT dingjack dyadlearningversusindividuallearningundermedicalsimulationconditionsasystematicreview
AT xiaoxin dyadlearningversusindividuallearningundermedicalsimulationconditionsasystematicreview
AT biagishanon dyadlearningversusindividuallearningundermedicalsimulationconditionsasystematicreview
AT varkeythomas dyadlearningversusindividuallearningundermedicalsimulationconditionsasystematicreview