Cargando…

AI-based multi-PRS models outperform classical single-PRS models

Polygenic risk scores (PRS) calculate the risk for a specific disease based on the weighted sum of associated alleles from different genetic loci in the germline estimated by regression models. Recent advances in genetics made it possible to create polygenic predictors of complex human traits, inclu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Klau, Jan Henric, Maj, Carlo, Klinkhammer, Hannah, Krawitz, Peter M., Mayr, Andreas, Hillmer, Axel M., Schumacher, Johannes, Heider, Dominik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10335560/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37441549
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2023.1217860
_version_ 1785071024482549760
author Klau, Jan Henric
Maj, Carlo
Klinkhammer, Hannah
Krawitz, Peter M.
Mayr, Andreas
Hillmer, Axel M.
Schumacher, Johannes
Heider, Dominik
author_facet Klau, Jan Henric
Maj, Carlo
Klinkhammer, Hannah
Krawitz, Peter M.
Mayr, Andreas
Hillmer, Axel M.
Schumacher, Johannes
Heider, Dominik
author_sort Klau, Jan Henric
collection PubMed
description Polygenic risk scores (PRS) calculate the risk for a specific disease based on the weighted sum of associated alleles from different genetic loci in the germline estimated by regression models. Recent advances in genetics made it possible to create polygenic predictors of complex human traits, including risks for many important complex diseases, such as cancer, diabetes, or cardiovascular diseases, typically influenced by many genetic variants, each of which has a negligible effect on overall risk. In the current study, we analyzed whether adding additional PRS from other diseases to the prediction models and replacing the regressions with machine learning models can improve overall predictive performance. Results showed that multi-PRS models outperform single-PRS models significantly on different diseases. Moreover, replacing regression models with machine learning models, i.e., deep learning, can also improve overall accuracy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10335560
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103355602023-07-12 AI-based multi-PRS models outperform classical single-PRS models Klau, Jan Henric Maj, Carlo Klinkhammer, Hannah Krawitz, Peter M. Mayr, Andreas Hillmer, Axel M. Schumacher, Johannes Heider, Dominik Front Genet Genetics Polygenic risk scores (PRS) calculate the risk for a specific disease based on the weighted sum of associated alleles from different genetic loci in the germline estimated by regression models. Recent advances in genetics made it possible to create polygenic predictors of complex human traits, including risks for many important complex diseases, such as cancer, diabetes, or cardiovascular diseases, typically influenced by many genetic variants, each of which has a negligible effect on overall risk. In the current study, we analyzed whether adding additional PRS from other diseases to the prediction models and replacing the regressions with machine learning models can improve overall predictive performance. Results showed that multi-PRS models outperform single-PRS models significantly on different diseases. Moreover, replacing regression models with machine learning models, i.e., deep learning, can also improve overall accuracy. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10335560/ /pubmed/37441549 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2023.1217860 Text en Copyright © 2023 Klau, Maj, Klinkhammer, Krawitz, Mayr, Hillmer, Schumacher and Heider. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Genetics
Klau, Jan Henric
Maj, Carlo
Klinkhammer, Hannah
Krawitz, Peter M.
Mayr, Andreas
Hillmer, Axel M.
Schumacher, Johannes
Heider, Dominik
AI-based multi-PRS models outperform classical single-PRS models
title AI-based multi-PRS models outperform classical single-PRS models
title_full AI-based multi-PRS models outperform classical single-PRS models
title_fullStr AI-based multi-PRS models outperform classical single-PRS models
title_full_unstemmed AI-based multi-PRS models outperform classical single-PRS models
title_short AI-based multi-PRS models outperform classical single-PRS models
title_sort ai-based multi-prs models outperform classical single-prs models
topic Genetics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10335560/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37441549
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2023.1217860
work_keys_str_mv AT klaujanhenric aibasedmultiprsmodelsoutperformclassicalsingleprsmodels
AT majcarlo aibasedmultiprsmodelsoutperformclassicalsingleprsmodels
AT klinkhammerhannah aibasedmultiprsmodelsoutperformclassicalsingleprsmodels
AT krawitzpeterm aibasedmultiprsmodelsoutperformclassicalsingleprsmodels
AT mayrandreas aibasedmultiprsmodelsoutperformclassicalsingleprsmodels
AT hillmeraxelm aibasedmultiprsmodelsoutperformclassicalsingleprsmodels
AT schumacherjohannes aibasedmultiprsmodelsoutperformclassicalsingleprsmodels
AT heiderdominik aibasedmultiprsmodelsoutperformclassicalsingleprsmodels