Cargando…
AI-based multi-PRS models outperform classical single-PRS models
Polygenic risk scores (PRS) calculate the risk for a specific disease based on the weighted sum of associated alleles from different genetic loci in the germline estimated by regression models. Recent advances in genetics made it possible to create polygenic predictors of complex human traits, inclu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10335560/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37441549 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2023.1217860 |
_version_ | 1785071024482549760 |
---|---|
author | Klau, Jan Henric Maj, Carlo Klinkhammer, Hannah Krawitz, Peter M. Mayr, Andreas Hillmer, Axel M. Schumacher, Johannes Heider, Dominik |
author_facet | Klau, Jan Henric Maj, Carlo Klinkhammer, Hannah Krawitz, Peter M. Mayr, Andreas Hillmer, Axel M. Schumacher, Johannes Heider, Dominik |
author_sort | Klau, Jan Henric |
collection | PubMed |
description | Polygenic risk scores (PRS) calculate the risk for a specific disease based on the weighted sum of associated alleles from different genetic loci in the germline estimated by regression models. Recent advances in genetics made it possible to create polygenic predictors of complex human traits, including risks for many important complex diseases, such as cancer, diabetes, or cardiovascular diseases, typically influenced by many genetic variants, each of which has a negligible effect on overall risk. In the current study, we analyzed whether adding additional PRS from other diseases to the prediction models and replacing the regressions with machine learning models can improve overall predictive performance. Results showed that multi-PRS models outperform single-PRS models significantly on different diseases. Moreover, replacing regression models with machine learning models, i.e., deep learning, can also improve overall accuracy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10335560 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103355602023-07-12 AI-based multi-PRS models outperform classical single-PRS models Klau, Jan Henric Maj, Carlo Klinkhammer, Hannah Krawitz, Peter M. Mayr, Andreas Hillmer, Axel M. Schumacher, Johannes Heider, Dominik Front Genet Genetics Polygenic risk scores (PRS) calculate the risk for a specific disease based on the weighted sum of associated alleles from different genetic loci in the germline estimated by regression models. Recent advances in genetics made it possible to create polygenic predictors of complex human traits, including risks for many important complex diseases, such as cancer, diabetes, or cardiovascular diseases, typically influenced by many genetic variants, each of which has a negligible effect on overall risk. In the current study, we analyzed whether adding additional PRS from other diseases to the prediction models and replacing the regressions with machine learning models can improve overall predictive performance. Results showed that multi-PRS models outperform single-PRS models significantly on different diseases. Moreover, replacing regression models with machine learning models, i.e., deep learning, can also improve overall accuracy. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10335560/ /pubmed/37441549 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2023.1217860 Text en Copyright © 2023 Klau, Maj, Klinkhammer, Krawitz, Mayr, Hillmer, Schumacher and Heider. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Genetics Klau, Jan Henric Maj, Carlo Klinkhammer, Hannah Krawitz, Peter M. Mayr, Andreas Hillmer, Axel M. Schumacher, Johannes Heider, Dominik AI-based multi-PRS models outperform classical single-PRS models |
title | AI-based multi-PRS models outperform classical single-PRS models |
title_full | AI-based multi-PRS models outperform classical single-PRS models |
title_fullStr | AI-based multi-PRS models outperform classical single-PRS models |
title_full_unstemmed | AI-based multi-PRS models outperform classical single-PRS models |
title_short | AI-based multi-PRS models outperform classical single-PRS models |
title_sort | ai-based multi-prs models outperform classical single-prs models |
topic | Genetics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10335560/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37441549 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2023.1217860 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT klaujanhenric aibasedmultiprsmodelsoutperformclassicalsingleprsmodels AT majcarlo aibasedmultiprsmodelsoutperformclassicalsingleprsmodels AT klinkhammerhannah aibasedmultiprsmodelsoutperformclassicalsingleprsmodels AT krawitzpeterm aibasedmultiprsmodelsoutperformclassicalsingleprsmodels AT mayrandreas aibasedmultiprsmodelsoutperformclassicalsingleprsmodels AT hillmeraxelm aibasedmultiprsmodelsoutperformclassicalsingleprsmodels AT schumacherjohannes aibasedmultiprsmodelsoutperformclassicalsingleprsmodels AT heiderdominik aibasedmultiprsmodelsoutperformclassicalsingleprsmodels |