Cargando…

Process Evaluation of a Collaborative Social Media Health Campaign: An Analysis of Partner and User Engagement

Collaborative health promotion campaigns are advantageous because they extend the resources and reach of any single organization. Yet, they can be challenging because they require partner commitment and compromise. On social media, however, these campaigns are especially beneficial due to the high d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hether, Heather J., O’Connor-Coates, Elizabeth, Crittendon, Robyn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10336705/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36722287
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15248399231152469
_version_ 1785071265435877376
author Hether, Heather J.
O’Connor-Coates, Elizabeth
Crittendon, Robyn
author_facet Hether, Heather J.
O’Connor-Coates, Elizabeth
Crittendon, Robyn
author_sort Hether, Heather J.
collection PubMed
description Collaborative health promotion campaigns are advantageous because they extend the resources and reach of any single organization. Yet, they can be challenging because they require partner commitment and compromise. On social media, however, these campaigns are especially beneficial due to the high demand for ongoing content that facilitates user engagement. This study is a content analysis of an annual collaborative campaign, Preteen Vaccine Week, conducted by the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) to promote preteen immunizations. Campaign partners are encouraged to use creative assets provided by CDPH and to follow a themed content calendar. Message characteristics and audience engagement were evaluated for 2 years of the campaign (2019–2020). Results indicate that when there was a specific health issue scheduled as the daily theme, 85% of posts reflected that health topic. However, when the theme was general awareness, only 15% of posts aligned. Furthermore, the majority of posts included supplemental audiovisual assets of which nearly half were provided by CDPH. These findings suggest partners attempted to work together. Analyses of message characteristics indicate there was little effort to encourage online user engagement; however, a majority of messages included a call-to-action. These findings indicate that health organizations continue to use social media much like they use mass media: for information dissemination and behavioral recommendations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10336705
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103367052023-07-13 Process Evaluation of a Collaborative Social Media Health Campaign: An Analysis of Partner and User Engagement Hether, Heather J. O’Connor-Coates, Elizabeth Crittendon, Robyn Health Promot Pract Articles Collaborative health promotion campaigns are advantageous because they extend the resources and reach of any single organization. Yet, they can be challenging because they require partner commitment and compromise. On social media, however, these campaigns are especially beneficial due to the high demand for ongoing content that facilitates user engagement. This study is a content analysis of an annual collaborative campaign, Preteen Vaccine Week, conducted by the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) to promote preteen immunizations. Campaign partners are encouraged to use creative assets provided by CDPH and to follow a themed content calendar. Message characteristics and audience engagement were evaluated for 2 years of the campaign (2019–2020). Results indicate that when there was a specific health issue scheduled as the daily theme, 85% of posts reflected that health topic. However, when the theme was general awareness, only 15% of posts aligned. Furthermore, the majority of posts included supplemental audiovisual assets of which nearly half were provided by CDPH. These findings suggest partners attempted to work together. Analyses of message characteristics indicate there was little effort to encourage online user engagement; however, a majority of messages included a call-to-action. These findings indicate that health organizations continue to use social media much like they use mass media: for information dissemination and behavioral recommendations. SAGE Publications 2023-02-01 2023-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10336705/ /pubmed/36722287 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15248399231152469 Text en © 2023 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Articles
Hether, Heather J.
O’Connor-Coates, Elizabeth
Crittendon, Robyn
Process Evaluation of a Collaborative Social Media Health Campaign: An Analysis of Partner and User Engagement
title Process Evaluation of a Collaborative Social Media Health Campaign: An Analysis of Partner and User Engagement
title_full Process Evaluation of a Collaborative Social Media Health Campaign: An Analysis of Partner and User Engagement
title_fullStr Process Evaluation of a Collaborative Social Media Health Campaign: An Analysis of Partner and User Engagement
title_full_unstemmed Process Evaluation of a Collaborative Social Media Health Campaign: An Analysis of Partner and User Engagement
title_short Process Evaluation of a Collaborative Social Media Health Campaign: An Analysis of Partner and User Engagement
title_sort process evaluation of a collaborative social media health campaign: an analysis of partner and user engagement
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10336705/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36722287
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15248399231152469
work_keys_str_mv AT hetherheatherj processevaluationofacollaborativesocialmediahealthcampaignananalysisofpartneranduserengagement
AT oconnorcoateselizabeth processevaluationofacollaborativesocialmediahealthcampaignananalysisofpartneranduserengagement
AT crittendonrobyn processevaluationofacollaborativesocialmediahealthcampaignananalysisofpartneranduserengagement