Cargando…

Exon-intron boundary inhibits m(6)A deposition, enabling m(6)A distribution hallmark, longer mRNA half-life and flexible protein coding

Regional bias of N(6)-methyladenosine (m(6)A) mRNA modification avoiding splice site region, calls for an open hypothesis whether exon-intron boundary could affect m(6)A deposition. By deep learning modeling, we find that exon-intron boundary represses a proportion (12% to 34%) of m(6)A deposition a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Luo, Zhiyuan, Ma, Qilian, Sun, Shan, Li, Ningning, Wang, Hongfeng, Ying, Zheng, Ke, Shengdong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10345190/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37443320
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-39897-1
Descripción
Sumario:Regional bias of N(6)-methyladenosine (m(6)A) mRNA modification avoiding splice site region, calls for an open hypothesis whether exon-intron boundary could affect m(6)A deposition. By deep learning modeling, we find that exon-intron boundary represses a proportion (12% to 34%) of m(6)A deposition at adjacent exons (~100 nt to splice site). Experiments validate that m(6)A signal increases once the host gene does not undergo pre-mRNA splicing to produce the same mRNA. Inhibited m(6)A sites have higher m(6)A enhancers and lower m(6)A silencers locally and show high heterogeneity at different exons genome-widely, with only a small proportion (12% to 15%) of exons showing strong inhibition, enabling more stable mRNAs and flexible protein coding. m(6)A is majorly responsible for why mRNAs with more exons be more stable. Exon junction complex (EJC) only partially contributes to this exon-intron boundary m(6)A inhibition in some short internal exons, highlighting additional factors yet to be identified.