Cargando…
Peer Teaching in Undergraduate Medical Education: What are the Learning Outputs for the Student-Teachers? A Systematic Review
INTRODUCTION: To achieve quality in medical education, peer teaching, understood as students taking on roles as educators for peers, is frequently used as a teaching intervention. While the benefits of peer teaching for learners and faculty are described in detail in the literature, less attention i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10349571/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37455859 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S401766 |
_version_ | 1785073944259198976 |
---|---|
author | Tanveer, Mohammed Anass Mildestvedt, Thomas Skjærseth, Idun Grimstad Arntzen, Harlad Haugsmyr Kenne, Ellinor Bonnevier, Anna Stenfors, Terese Kvernenes, Monika |
author_facet | Tanveer, Mohammed Anass Mildestvedt, Thomas Skjærseth, Idun Grimstad Arntzen, Harlad Haugsmyr Kenne, Ellinor Bonnevier, Anna Stenfors, Terese Kvernenes, Monika |
author_sort | Tanveer, Mohammed Anass |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: To achieve quality in medical education, peer teaching, understood as students taking on roles as educators for peers, is frequently used as a teaching intervention. While the benefits of peer teaching for learners and faculty are described in detail in the literature, less attention is given to the learning outputs for the student-teachers. This systematic review focuses on the learning outputs for medical undergraduates acting as student-teachers in the last decade (2012–2022). AIM: Our aim is to describe what learning outputs student-teachers have from peer teaching, and map what research methods are used to assess the outputs. We defined learning outputs in a broad sense, including all types of learning experiences, intended and non-intended, associated with being a peer teacher. METHODS: A literature search was conducted in four electronic databases. Title, abstract and full text were screened by 8 independent reviewers and selection was based on predefined eligibility criteria. We excluded papers not describing structured peer teaching interventions with student-teachers in a formalized role. From the included articles we extracted information about the learning outputs of being a student-teacher as medical undergraduate. RESULTS: From 668 potential titles, 100 were obtained as full-texts, and 45 selected after close examination, group deliberation, updated search and quality assessment using MERSQI score (average score 10/18). Most articles reported learning outputs using mixed methods (67%). Student-teachers reported an increase in subject-specific learning (62%), pedagogical knowledge and skills (49%), personal outputs (31%) and generic skills (38%). Most articles reported outputs using self-reported data (91%). CONCLUSION: Although there are few studies that systematically investigate student-teachers learning outputs, evidence suggests that peer teaching offers learning outputs for the student-teachers and helps them become better physicians. Further research is needed to enhance learning outputs for student-teachers and systematically investigate student-teachers’ learning outputs and its impact on student-teachers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10349571 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103495712023-07-16 Peer Teaching in Undergraduate Medical Education: What are the Learning Outputs for the Student-Teachers? A Systematic Review Tanveer, Mohammed Anass Mildestvedt, Thomas Skjærseth, Idun Grimstad Arntzen, Harlad Haugsmyr Kenne, Ellinor Bonnevier, Anna Stenfors, Terese Kvernenes, Monika Adv Med Educ Pract Review INTRODUCTION: To achieve quality in medical education, peer teaching, understood as students taking on roles as educators for peers, is frequently used as a teaching intervention. While the benefits of peer teaching for learners and faculty are described in detail in the literature, less attention is given to the learning outputs for the student-teachers. This systematic review focuses on the learning outputs for medical undergraduates acting as student-teachers in the last decade (2012–2022). AIM: Our aim is to describe what learning outputs student-teachers have from peer teaching, and map what research methods are used to assess the outputs. We defined learning outputs in a broad sense, including all types of learning experiences, intended and non-intended, associated with being a peer teacher. METHODS: A literature search was conducted in four electronic databases. Title, abstract and full text were screened by 8 independent reviewers and selection was based on predefined eligibility criteria. We excluded papers not describing structured peer teaching interventions with student-teachers in a formalized role. From the included articles we extracted information about the learning outputs of being a student-teacher as medical undergraduate. RESULTS: From 668 potential titles, 100 were obtained as full-texts, and 45 selected after close examination, group deliberation, updated search and quality assessment using MERSQI score (average score 10/18). Most articles reported learning outputs using mixed methods (67%). Student-teachers reported an increase in subject-specific learning (62%), pedagogical knowledge and skills (49%), personal outputs (31%) and generic skills (38%). Most articles reported outputs using self-reported data (91%). CONCLUSION: Although there are few studies that systematically investigate student-teachers learning outputs, evidence suggests that peer teaching offers learning outputs for the student-teachers and helps them become better physicians. Further research is needed to enhance learning outputs for student-teachers and systematically investigate student-teachers’ learning outputs and its impact on student-teachers. Dove 2023-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10349571/ /pubmed/37455859 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S401766 Text en © 2023 Tanveer et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Review Tanveer, Mohammed Anass Mildestvedt, Thomas Skjærseth, Idun Grimstad Arntzen, Harlad Haugsmyr Kenne, Ellinor Bonnevier, Anna Stenfors, Terese Kvernenes, Monika Peer Teaching in Undergraduate Medical Education: What are the Learning Outputs for the Student-Teachers? A Systematic Review |
title | Peer Teaching in Undergraduate Medical Education: What are the Learning Outputs for the Student-Teachers? A Systematic Review |
title_full | Peer Teaching in Undergraduate Medical Education: What are the Learning Outputs for the Student-Teachers? A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Peer Teaching in Undergraduate Medical Education: What are the Learning Outputs for the Student-Teachers? A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Peer Teaching in Undergraduate Medical Education: What are the Learning Outputs for the Student-Teachers? A Systematic Review |
title_short | Peer Teaching in Undergraduate Medical Education: What are the Learning Outputs for the Student-Teachers? A Systematic Review |
title_sort | peer teaching in undergraduate medical education: what are the learning outputs for the student-teachers? a systematic review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10349571/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37455859 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S401766 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tanveermohammedanass peerteachinginundergraduatemedicaleducationwhatarethelearningoutputsforthestudentteachersasystematicreview AT mildestvedtthomas peerteachinginundergraduatemedicaleducationwhatarethelearningoutputsforthestudentteachersasystematicreview AT skjærsethidungrimstad peerteachinginundergraduatemedicaleducationwhatarethelearningoutputsforthestudentteachersasystematicreview AT arntzenharladhaugsmyr peerteachinginundergraduatemedicaleducationwhatarethelearningoutputsforthestudentteachersasystematicreview AT kenneellinor peerteachinginundergraduatemedicaleducationwhatarethelearningoutputsforthestudentteachersasystematicreview AT bonnevieranna peerteachinginundergraduatemedicaleducationwhatarethelearningoutputsforthestudentteachersasystematicreview AT stenforsterese peerteachinginundergraduatemedicaleducationwhatarethelearningoutputsforthestudentteachersasystematicreview AT kvernenesmonika peerteachinginundergraduatemedicaleducationwhatarethelearningoutputsforthestudentteachersasystematicreview |