Cargando…

GPCRome-wide analysis of G-protein-coupling diversity using a computational biology approach

GPCRs are master regulators of cell signaling by transducing extracellular stimuli into the cell via selective coupling to intracellular G-proteins. Here we present a computational analysis of the structural determinants of G-protein-coupling repertoire of experimental and predicted 3D GPCR-G-protei...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Matic, Marin, Miglionico, Pasquale, Tatsumi, Manae, Inoue, Asuka, Raimondi, Francesco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10356834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37468476
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-40045-y
_version_ 1785075362774908928
author Matic, Marin
Miglionico, Pasquale
Tatsumi, Manae
Inoue, Asuka
Raimondi, Francesco
author_facet Matic, Marin
Miglionico, Pasquale
Tatsumi, Manae
Inoue, Asuka
Raimondi, Francesco
author_sort Matic, Marin
collection PubMed
description GPCRs are master regulators of cell signaling by transducing extracellular stimuli into the cell via selective coupling to intracellular G-proteins. Here we present a computational analysis of the structural determinants of G-protein-coupling repertoire of experimental and predicted 3D GPCR-G-protein complexes. Interface contact analysis recapitulates structural hallmarks associated with G-protein-coupling specificity, including TM5, TM6 and ICLs. We employ interface contacts as fingerprints to cluster G(s) vs G(i) complexes in an unsupervised fashion, suggesting that interface residues contribute to selective coupling. We experimentally confirm on a promiscuous receptor (CCKAR) that mutations of some of these specificity-determining positions bias the coupling selectivity. Interestingly, G(s)-GPCR complexes have more conserved interfaces, while G(i/o) proteins adopt a wider number of alternative docking poses, as assessed via structural alignments of representative 3D complexes. Binding energy calculations demonstrate that distinct structural properties of the complexes are associated to higher stability of G(s) than G(i/o) complexes. AlphaFold2 predictions of experimental binary complexes confirm several of these structural features and allow us to augment the structural coverage of poorly characterized complexes such as G(12/13).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10356834
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103568342023-07-21 GPCRome-wide analysis of G-protein-coupling diversity using a computational biology approach Matic, Marin Miglionico, Pasquale Tatsumi, Manae Inoue, Asuka Raimondi, Francesco Nat Commun Article GPCRs are master regulators of cell signaling by transducing extracellular stimuli into the cell via selective coupling to intracellular G-proteins. Here we present a computational analysis of the structural determinants of G-protein-coupling repertoire of experimental and predicted 3D GPCR-G-protein complexes. Interface contact analysis recapitulates structural hallmarks associated with G-protein-coupling specificity, including TM5, TM6 and ICLs. We employ interface contacts as fingerprints to cluster G(s) vs G(i) complexes in an unsupervised fashion, suggesting that interface residues contribute to selective coupling. We experimentally confirm on a promiscuous receptor (CCKAR) that mutations of some of these specificity-determining positions bias the coupling selectivity. Interestingly, G(s)-GPCR complexes have more conserved interfaces, while G(i/o) proteins adopt a wider number of alternative docking poses, as assessed via structural alignments of representative 3D complexes. Binding energy calculations demonstrate that distinct structural properties of the complexes are associated to higher stability of G(s) than G(i/o) complexes. AlphaFold2 predictions of experimental binary complexes confirm several of these structural features and allow us to augment the structural coverage of poorly characterized complexes such as G(12/13). Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10356834/ /pubmed/37468476 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-40045-y Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Matic, Marin
Miglionico, Pasquale
Tatsumi, Manae
Inoue, Asuka
Raimondi, Francesco
GPCRome-wide analysis of G-protein-coupling diversity using a computational biology approach
title GPCRome-wide analysis of G-protein-coupling diversity using a computational biology approach
title_full GPCRome-wide analysis of G-protein-coupling diversity using a computational biology approach
title_fullStr GPCRome-wide analysis of G-protein-coupling diversity using a computational biology approach
title_full_unstemmed GPCRome-wide analysis of G-protein-coupling diversity using a computational biology approach
title_short GPCRome-wide analysis of G-protein-coupling diversity using a computational biology approach
title_sort gpcrome-wide analysis of g-protein-coupling diversity using a computational biology approach
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10356834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37468476
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-40045-y
work_keys_str_mv AT maticmarin gpcromewideanalysisofgproteincouplingdiversityusingacomputationalbiologyapproach
AT miglionicopasquale gpcromewideanalysisofgproteincouplingdiversityusingacomputationalbiologyapproach
AT tatsumimanae gpcromewideanalysisofgproteincouplingdiversityusingacomputationalbiologyapproach
AT inoueasuka gpcromewideanalysisofgproteincouplingdiversityusingacomputationalbiologyapproach
AT raimondifrancesco gpcromewideanalysisofgproteincouplingdiversityusingacomputationalbiologyapproach