Assessment of redundancy, methodological and reporting quality, and potential discrepancies of results of systematic reviews of early mobilisation of critically ill adults: a meta-research protocol

INTRODUCTION: Several systematic reviews (SRs) have been conducted to determine the effectiveness of early mobilisation in critically ill adults with heterogeneous methodology and results. Redundancy in conducting SRs, unclear justification when leading new SRs or updating, and discordant results of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gutierrez-Arias, Ruvistay, Pieper, Dawid, Nydahl, Peter, González-Seguel, Felipe, Jalil, Yorschua, Oliveros, Maria-Jose, Torres-Castro, Rodrigo, Seron, Pamela
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Rehabilitation Medicine
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10360432/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37474166
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074615

Internet

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10360432/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37474166
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074615

Ejemplares similares