Cargando…

Comparison of NET quantification methods based on immunofluorescence microscopy: Hand-counting, semi-automated and automated evaluations

Formation of neutrophil extracellular traps was first described in 2004, showing that NETs are composed of decondensed chromatin fibers and nuclear and granule components. Free DNA is often used to quantify NETs, but to differentiate NETosis from necrotic DNA-release, immunofluorescence microscopy w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Henneck, Timo, Krüger, Christina, Nerlich, Andreas, Langer, Melissa, Fingerhut, Leonie, Bonilla, Marta C., Meurer, Marita, von den Berg, Sönke, de Buhr, Nicole, Branitzki-Heinemann, Katja, von Köckritz-Blickwede, Maren
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10361044/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37484269
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16982
_version_ 1785076145893408768
author Henneck, Timo
Krüger, Christina
Nerlich, Andreas
Langer, Melissa
Fingerhut, Leonie
Bonilla, Marta C.
Meurer, Marita
von den Berg, Sönke
de Buhr, Nicole
Branitzki-Heinemann, Katja
von Köckritz-Blickwede, Maren
author_facet Henneck, Timo
Krüger, Christina
Nerlich, Andreas
Langer, Melissa
Fingerhut, Leonie
Bonilla, Marta C.
Meurer, Marita
von den Berg, Sönke
de Buhr, Nicole
Branitzki-Heinemann, Katja
von Köckritz-Blickwede, Maren
author_sort Henneck, Timo
collection PubMed
description Formation of neutrophil extracellular traps was first described in 2004, showing that NETs are composed of decondensed chromatin fibers and nuclear and granule components. Free DNA is often used to quantify NETs, but to differentiate NETosis from necrotic DNA-release, immunofluorescence microscopy with NET-specific markers is required. Although evaluation by hand is time-consuming and difficult to standardize, it is still widespread. Unfortunately, no standardized method and only limited software tools are available for NET evaluation. This study provides an overview of recent techniques in use and aims to compare two published computer-based methods with hand counting. We found that the selected semi-automated quantification method and fully automated quantification via NETQUANT differed significantly from results obtained by hand and exhibited problems in detection of complex NET structures with partially illogical results. In contrast to that, trained persons were able to adapt to varying settings. Future approaches aimed at developing deep-learning algorithms for fast and reproducible quantification of NETs are needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10361044
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103610442023-07-22 Comparison of NET quantification methods based on immunofluorescence microscopy: Hand-counting, semi-automated and automated evaluations Henneck, Timo Krüger, Christina Nerlich, Andreas Langer, Melissa Fingerhut, Leonie Bonilla, Marta C. Meurer, Marita von den Berg, Sönke de Buhr, Nicole Branitzki-Heinemann, Katja von Köckritz-Blickwede, Maren Heliyon Research Article Formation of neutrophil extracellular traps was first described in 2004, showing that NETs are composed of decondensed chromatin fibers and nuclear and granule components. Free DNA is often used to quantify NETs, but to differentiate NETosis from necrotic DNA-release, immunofluorescence microscopy with NET-specific markers is required. Although evaluation by hand is time-consuming and difficult to standardize, it is still widespread. Unfortunately, no standardized method and only limited software tools are available for NET evaluation. This study provides an overview of recent techniques in use and aims to compare two published computer-based methods with hand counting. We found that the selected semi-automated quantification method and fully automated quantification via NETQUANT differed significantly from results obtained by hand and exhibited problems in detection of complex NET structures with partially illogical results. In contrast to that, trained persons were able to adapt to varying settings. Future approaches aimed at developing deep-learning algorithms for fast and reproducible quantification of NETs are needed. Elsevier 2023-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10361044/ /pubmed/37484269 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16982 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Henneck, Timo
Krüger, Christina
Nerlich, Andreas
Langer, Melissa
Fingerhut, Leonie
Bonilla, Marta C.
Meurer, Marita
von den Berg, Sönke
de Buhr, Nicole
Branitzki-Heinemann, Katja
von Köckritz-Blickwede, Maren
Comparison of NET quantification methods based on immunofluorescence microscopy: Hand-counting, semi-automated and automated evaluations
title Comparison of NET quantification methods based on immunofluorescence microscopy: Hand-counting, semi-automated and automated evaluations
title_full Comparison of NET quantification methods based on immunofluorescence microscopy: Hand-counting, semi-automated and automated evaluations
title_fullStr Comparison of NET quantification methods based on immunofluorescence microscopy: Hand-counting, semi-automated and automated evaluations
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of NET quantification methods based on immunofluorescence microscopy: Hand-counting, semi-automated and automated evaluations
title_short Comparison of NET quantification methods based on immunofluorescence microscopy: Hand-counting, semi-automated and automated evaluations
title_sort comparison of net quantification methods based on immunofluorescence microscopy: hand-counting, semi-automated and automated evaluations
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10361044/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37484269
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16982
work_keys_str_mv AT hennecktimo comparisonofnetquantificationmethodsbasedonimmunofluorescencemicroscopyhandcountingsemiautomatedandautomatedevaluations
AT krugerchristina comparisonofnetquantificationmethodsbasedonimmunofluorescencemicroscopyhandcountingsemiautomatedandautomatedevaluations
AT nerlichandreas comparisonofnetquantificationmethodsbasedonimmunofluorescencemicroscopyhandcountingsemiautomatedandautomatedevaluations
AT langermelissa comparisonofnetquantificationmethodsbasedonimmunofluorescencemicroscopyhandcountingsemiautomatedandautomatedevaluations
AT fingerhutleonie comparisonofnetquantificationmethodsbasedonimmunofluorescencemicroscopyhandcountingsemiautomatedandautomatedevaluations
AT bonillamartac comparisonofnetquantificationmethodsbasedonimmunofluorescencemicroscopyhandcountingsemiautomatedandautomatedevaluations
AT meurermarita comparisonofnetquantificationmethodsbasedonimmunofluorescencemicroscopyhandcountingsemiautomatedandautomatedevaluations
AT vondenbergsonke comparisonofnetquantificationmethodsbasedonimmunofluorescencemicroscopyhandcountingsemiautomatedandautomatedevaluations
AT debuhrnicole comparisonofnetquantificationmethodsbasedonimmunofluorescencemicroscopyhandcountingsemiautomatedandautomatedevaluations
AT branitzkiheinemannkatja comparisonofnetquantificationmethodsbasedonimmunofluorescencemicroscopyhandcountingsemiautomatedandautomatedevaluations
AT vonkockritzblickwedemaren comparisonofnetquantificationmethodsbasedonimmunofluorescencemicroscopyhandcountingsemiautomatedandautomatedevaluations