Cargando…
Follow‐up of the re‐evaluation of indigo carmine (E 132) as a food additive
Indigo carmine (E 312) was re‐evaluated in 2014 by the EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient sources added to Food (ANS). The ANS Panel confirmed the acceptable daily intake (ADI) of 5 mg/kg body weight (bw) per day for indigo carmine allocated by JECFA (1975). The ANS Panel indicated that the A...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10369292/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37502014 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8103 |
_version_ | 1785077729391017984 |
---|---|
author | Younes, Maged Aquilina, Gabriele Degen, Gisela Engel, Karl‐Heinz Fowler, Paul Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose Fürst, Peter Gürtler, Rainer Husøy, Trine Manco, Melania Mennes, Wim Passamonti, Sabina Moldeus, Peter Shah, Romina Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine Wright, Matthew Cheyns, Karlien FitzGerald, Reginald Mirat, Manuela Mortensen, Alicja Ulbrich, Beate Woutersen, Ruud Rincon, Ana Maria Ruggeri, Laura Smeraldi, Camilla Tard, Alexandra Gundert‐Remy, Ursula |
author_facet | Younes, Maged Aquilina, Gabriele Degen, Gisela Engel, Karl‐Heinz Fowler, Paul Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose Fürst, Peter Gürtler, Rainer Husøy, Trine Manco, Melania Mennes, Wim Passamonti, Sabina Moldeus, Peter Shah, Romina Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine Wright, Matthew Cheyns, Karlien FitzGerald, Reginald Mirat, Manuela Mortensen, Alicja Ulbrich, Beate Woutersen, Ruud Rincon, Ana Maria Ruggeri, Laura Smeraldi, Camilla Tard, Alexandra Gundert‐Remy, Ursula |
collection | PubMed |
description | Indigo carmine (E 312) was re‐evaluated in 2014 by the EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient sources added to Food (ANS). The ANS Panel confirmed the acceptable daily intake (ADI) of 5 mg/kg body weight (bw) per day for indigo carmine allocated by JECFA (1975). The ANS Panel indicated that the ADI was applicable to a material with a purity of 93% pure colouring and manufactured using processes resulting in comparable residuals as material used in the Borzelleca et al. studies (1985, 1986) and Borzelleca and Hogan (1985) which were the basis for deriving the ADI. The ANS Panel considered that any extension of the ADI to indigo carmine of lower purity and/or manufactured using a different process would require new data to address the adverse effects on the testes observed in the Dixit and Goyal (2013) study. Following a European Commission call for data to submit data to fill the data gaps, an IBO submitted technical and toxicological data. Considering the technical data, the EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF Panel) recommended some modifications of the existing EU specifications for E 132, mainly to lower the limits for toxic elements. Considering the toxicological data, an IBO has submitted a 56‐day dietary study to address the adverse effects on testes using a material with 88% purity. The results of this study submitted did not confirm the severe adverse effects observed in the Dixit and Goyal study. Considering all the available information, the Panel confirmed the ADI of 5 mg/kg bw per day for indigo carmine (E 132) disodium salts, meeting the proposed revisions of the specifications (85% minimum for the colouring matter). The Panel concluded that there is no safety concern for the use of indigo carmine (E 132) disodium salts at the reported use levels and submitted analytical data. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10369292 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103692922023-07-27 Follow‐up of the re‐evaluation of indigo carmine (E 132) as a food additive Younes, Maged Aquilina, Gabriele Degen, Gisela Engel, Karl‐Heinz Fowler, Paul Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose Fürst, Peter Gürtler, Rainer Husøy, Trine Manco, Melania Mennes, Wim Passamonti, Sabina Moldeus, Peter Shah, Romina Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine Wright, Matthew Cheyns, Karlien FitzGerald, Reginald Mirat, Manuela Mortensen, Alicja Ulbrich, Beate Woutersen, Ruud Rincon, Ana Maria Ruggeri, Laura Smeraldi, Camilla Tard, Alexandra Gundert‐Remy, Ursula EFSA J Scientific Opinion Indigo carmine (E 312) was re‐evaluated in 2014 by the EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient sources added to Food (ANS). The ANS Panel confirmed the acceptable daily intake (ADI) of 5 mg/kg body weight (bw) per day for indigo carmine allocated by JECFA (1975). The ANS Panel indicated that the ADI was applicable to a material with a purity of 93% pure colouring and manufactured using processes resulting in comparable residuals as material used in the Borzelleca et al. studies (1985, 1986) and Borzelleca and Hogan (1985) which were the basis for deriving the ADI. The ANS Panel considered that any extension of the ADI to indigo carmine of lower purity and/or manufactured using a different process would require new data to address the adverse effects on the testes observed in the Dixit and Goyal (2013) study. Following a European Commission call for data to submit data to fill the data gaps, an IBO submitted technical and toxicological data. Considering the technical data, the EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF Panel) recommended some modifications of the existing EU specifications for E 132, mainly to lower the limits for toxic elements. Considering the toxicological data, an IBO has submitted a 56‐day dietary study to address the adverse effects on testes using a material with 88% purity. The results of this study submitted did not confirm the severe adverse effects observed in the Dixit and Goyal study. Considering all the available information, the Panel confirmed the ADI of 5 mg/kg bw per day for indigo carmine (E 132) disodium salts, meeting the proposed revisions of the specifications (85% minimum for the colouring matter). The Panel concluded that there is no safety concern for the use of indigo carmine (E 132) disodium salts at the reported use levels and submitted analytical data. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10369292/ /pubmed/37502014 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8103 Text en © 2023 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by Wiley‐VCH GmbH on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Opinion Younes, Maged Aquilina, Gabriele Degen, Gisela Engel, Karl‐Heinz Fowler, Paul Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose Fürst, Peter Gürtler, Rainer Husøy, Trine Manco, Melania Mennes, Wim Passamonti, Sabina Moldeus, Peter Shah, Romina Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine Wright, Matthew Cheyns, Karlien FitzGerald, Reginald Mirat, Manuela Mortensen, Alicja Ulbrich, Beate Woutersen, Ruud Rincon, Ana Maria Ruggeri, Laura Smeraldi, Camilla Tard, Alexandra Gundert‐Remy, Ursula Follow‐up of the re‐evaluation of indigo carmine (E 132) as a food additive |
title | Follow‐up of the re‐evaluation of indigo carmine (E 132) as a food additive |
title_full | Follow‐up of the re‐evaluation of indigo carmine (E 132) as a food additive |
title_fullStr | Follow‐up of the re‐evaluation of indigo carmine (E 132) as a food additive |
title_full_unstemmed | Follow‐up of the re‐evaluation of indigo carmine (E 132) as a food additive |
title_short | Follow‐up of the re‐evaluation of indigo carmine (E 132) as a food additive |
title_sort | follow‐up of the re‐evaluation of indigo carmine (e 132) as a food additive |
topic | Scientific Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10369292/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37502014 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8103 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT followupofthereevaluationofindigocarminee132asafoodadditive AT younesmaged followupofthereevaluationofindigocarminee132asafoodadditive AT aquilinagabriele followupofthereevaluationofindigocarminee132asafoodadditive AT degengisela followupofthereevaluationofindigocarminee132asafoodadditive AT engelkarlheinz followupofthereevaluationofindigocarminee132asafoodadditive AT fowlerpaul followupofthereevaluationofindigocarminee132asafoodadditive AT frutosfernandezmariajose followupofthereevaluationofindigocarminee132asafoodadditive AT furstpeter followupofthereevaluationofindigocarminee132asafoodadditive AT gurtlerrainer followupofthereevaluationofindigocarminee132asafoodadditive AT husøytrine followupofthereevaluationofindigocarminee132asafoodadditive AT mancomelania followupofthereevaluationofindigocarminee132asafoodadditive AT menneswim followupofthereevaluationofindigocarminee132asafoodadditive AT passamontisabina followupofthereevaluationofindigocarminee132asafoodadditive AT moldeuspeter followupofthereevaluationofindigocarminee132asafoodadditive AT shahromina followupofthereevaluationofindigocarminee132asafoodadditive AT waalkensberendsenine followupofthereevaluationofindigocarminee132asafoodadditive AT wrightmatthew followupofthereevaluationofindigocarminee132asafoodadditive AT cheynskarlien followupofthereevaluationofindigocarminee132asafoodadditive AT fitzgeraldreginald followupofthereevaluationofindigocarminee132asafoodadditive AT miratmanuela followupofthereevaluationofindigocarminee132asafoodadditive AT mortensenalicja followupofthereevaluationofindigocarminee132asafoodadditive AT ulbrichbeate followupofthereevaluationofindigocarminee132asafoodadditive AT woutersenruud followupofthereevaluationofindigocarminee132asafoodadditive AT rinconanamaria followupofthereevaluationofindigocarminee132asafoodadditive AT ruggerilaura followupofthereevaluationofindigocarminee132asafoodadditive AT smeraldicamilla followupofthereevaluationofindigocarminee132asafoodadditive AT tardalexandra followupofthereevaluationofindigocarminee132asafoodadditive AT gundertremyursula followupofthereevaluationofindigocarminee132asafoodadditive |