Cargando…

Follow‐up of the re‐evaluation of indigo carmine (E 132) as a food additive

Indigo carmine (E 312) was re‐evaluated in 2014 by the EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient sources added to Food (ANS). The ANS Panel confirmed the acceptable daily intake (ADI) of 5 mg/kg body weight (bw) per day for indigo carmine allocated by JECFA (1975). The ANS Panel indicated that the A...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Younes, Maged, Aquilina, Gabriele, Degen, Gisela, Engel, Karl‐Heinz, Fowler, Paul, Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose, Fürst, Peter, Gürtler, Rainer, Husøy, Trine, Manco, Melania, Mennes, Wim, Passamonti, Sabina, Moldeus, Peter, Shah, Romina, Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine, Wright, Matthew, Cheyns, Karlien, FitzGerald, Reginald, Mirat, Manuela, Mortensen, Alicja, Ulbrich, Beate, Woutersen, Ruud, Rincon, Ana Maria, Ruggeri, Laura, Smeraldi, Camilla, Tard, Alexandra, Gundert‐Remy, Ursula
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10369292/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37502014
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8103
_version_ 1785077729391017984
author Younes, Maged
Aquilina, Gabriele
Degen, Gisela
Engel, Karl‐Heinz
Fowler, Paul
Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose
Fürst, Peter
Gürtler, Rainer
Husøy, Trine
Manco, Melania
Mennes, Wim
Passamonti, Sabina
Moldeus, Peter
Shah, Romina
Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine
Wright, Matthew
Cheyns, Karlien
FitzGerald, Reginald
Mirat, Manuela
Mortensen, Alicja
Ulbrich, Beate
Woutersen, Ruud
Rincon, Ana Maria
Ruggeri, Laura
Smeraldi, Camilla
Tard, Alexandra
Gundert‐Remy, Ursula
author_facet Younes, Maged
Aquilina, Gabriele
Degen, Gisela
Engel, Karl‐Heinz
Fowler, Paul
Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose
Fürst, Peter
Gürtler, Rainer
Husøy, Trine
Manco, Melania
Mennes, Wim
Passamonti, Sabina
Moldeus, Peter
Shah, Romina
Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine
Wright, Matthew
Cheyns, Karlien
FitzGerald, Reginald
Mirat, Manuela
Mortensen, Alicja
Ulbrich, Beate
Woutersen, Ruud
Rincon, Ana Maria
Ruggeri, Laura
Smeraldi, Camilla
Tard, Alexandra
Gundert‐Remy, Ursula
collection PubMed
description Indigo carmine (E 312) was re‐evaluated in 2014 by the EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient sources added to Food (ANS). The ANS Panel confirmed the acceptable daily intake (ADI) of 5 mg/kg body weight (bw) per day for indigo carmine allocated by JECFA (1975). The ANS Panel indicated that the ADI was applicable to a material with a purity of 93% pure colouring and manufactured using processes resulting in comparable residuals as material used in the Borzelleca et al. studies (1985, 1986) and Borzelleca and Hogan (1985) which were the basis for deriving the ADI. The ANS Panel considered that any extension of the ADI to indigo carmine of lower purity and/or manufactured using a different process would require new data to address the adverse effects on the testes observed in the Dixit and Goyal (2013) study. Following a European Commission call for data to submit data to fill the data gaps, an IBO submitted technical and toxicological data. Considering the technical data, the EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF Panel) recommended some modifications of the existing EU specifications for E 132, mainly to lower the limits for toxic elements. Considering the toxicological data, an IBO has submitted a 56‐day dietary study to address the adverse effects on testes using a material with 88% purity. The results of this study submitted did not confirm the severe adverse effects observed in the Dixit and Goyal study. Considering all the available information, the Panel confirmed the ADI of 5 mg/kg bw per day for indigo carmine (E 132) disodium salts, meeting the proposed revisions of the specifications (85% minimum for the colouring matter). The Panel concluded that there is no safety concern for the use of indigo carmine (E 132) disodium salts at the reported use levels and submitted analytical data.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10369292
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103692922023-07-27 Follow‐up of the re‐evaluation of indigo carmine (E 132) as a food additive Younes, Maged Aquilina, Gabriele Degen, Gisela Engel, Karl‐Heinz Fowler, Paul Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose Fürst, Peter Gürtler, Rainer Husøy, Trine Manco, Melania Mennes, Wim Passamonti, Sabina Moldeus, Peter Shah, Romina Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine Wright, Matthew Cheyns, Karlien FitzGerald, Reginald Mirat, Manuela Mortensen, Alicja Ulbrich, Beate Woutersen, Ruud Rincon, Ana Maria Ruggeri, Laura Smeraldi, Camilla Tard, Alexandra Gundert‐Remy, Ursula EFSA J Scientific Opinion Indigo carmine (E 312) was re‐evaluated in 2014 by the EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient sources added to Food (ANS). The ANS Panel confirmed the acceptable daily intake (ADI) of 5 mg/kg body weight (bw) per day for indigo carmine allocated by JECFA (1975). The ANS Panel indicated that the ADI was applicable to a material with a purity of 93% pure colouring and manufactured using processes resulting in comparable residuals as material used in the Borzelleca et al. studies (1985, 1986) and Borzelleca and Hogan (1985) which were the basis for deriving the ADI. The ANS Panel considered that any extension of the ADI to indigo carmine of lower purity and/or manufactured using a different process would require new data to address the adverse effects on the testes observed in the Dixit and Goyal (2013) study. Following a European Commission call for data to submit data to fill the data gaps, an IBO submitted technical and toxicological data. Considering the technical data, the EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF Panel) recommended some modifications of the existing EU specifications for E 132, mainly to lower the limits for toxic elements. Considering the toxicological data, an IBO has submitted a 56‐day dietary study to address the adverse effects on testes using a material with 88% purity. The results of this study submitted did not confirm the severe adverse effects observed in the Dixit and Goyal study. Considering all the available information, the Panel confirmed the ADI of 5 mg/kg bw per day for indigo carmine (E 132) disodium salts, meeting the proposed revisions of the specifications (85% minimum for the colouring matter). The Panel concluded that there is no safety concern for the use of indigo carmine (E 132) disodium salts at the reported use levels and submitted analytical data. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10369292/ /pubmed/37502014 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8103 Text en © 2023 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by Wiley‐VCH GmbH on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Scientific Opinion
Younes, Maged
Aquilina, Gabriele
Degen, Gisela
Engel, Karl‐Heinz
Fowler, Paul
Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose
Fürst, Peter
Gürtler, Rainer
Husøy, Trine
Manco, Melania
Mennes, Wim
Passamonti, Sabina
Moldeus, Peter
Shah, Romina
Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine
Wright, Matthew
Cheyns, Karlien
FitzGerald, Reginald
Mirat, Manuela
Mortensen, Alicja
Ulbrich, Beate
Woutersen, Ruud
Rincon, Ana Maria
Ruggeri, Laura
Smeraldi, Camilla
Tard, Alexandra
Gundert‐Remy, Ursula
Follow‐up of the re‐evaluation of indigo carmine (E 132) as a food additive
title Follow‐up of the re‐evaluation of indigo carmine (E 132) as a food additive
title_full Follow‐up of the re‐evaluation of indigo carmine (E 132) as a food additive
title_fullStr Follow‐up of the re‐evaluation of indigo carmine (E 132) as a food additive
title_full_unstemmed Follow‐up of the re‐evaluation of indigo carmine (E 132) as a food additive
title_short Follow‐up of the re‐evaluation of indigo carmine (E 132) as a food additive
title_sort follow‐up of the re‐evaluation of indigo carmine (e 132) as a food additive
topic Scientific Opinion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10369292/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37502014
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8103
work_keys_str_mv AT followupofthereevaluationofindigocarminee132asafoodadditive
AT younesmaged followupofthereevaluationofindigocarminee132asafoodadditive
AT aquilinagabriele followupofthereevaluationofindigocarminee132asafoodadditive
AT degengisela followupofthereevaluationofindigocarminee132asafoodadditive
AT engelkarlheinz followupofthereevaluationofindigocarminee132asafoodadditive
AT fowlerpaul followupofthereevaluationofindigocarminee132asafoodadditive
AT frutosfernandezmariajose followupofthereevaluationofindigocarminee132asafoodadditive
AT furstpeter followupofthereevaluationofindigocarminee132asafoodadditive
AT gurtlerrainer followupofthereevaluationofindigocarminee132asafoodadditive
AT husøytrine followupofthereevaluationofindigocarminee132asafoodadditive
AT mancomelania followupofthereevaluationofindigocarminee132asafoodadditive
AT menneswim followupofthereevaluationofindigocarminee132asafoodadditive
AT passamontisabina followupofthereevaluationofindigocarminee132asafoodadditive
AT moldeuspeter followupofthereevaluationofindigocarminee132asafoodadditive
AT shahromina followupofthereevaluationofindigocarminee132asafoodadditive
AT waalkensberendsenine followupofthereevaluationofindigocarminee132asafoodadditive
AT wrightmatthew followupofthereevaluationofindigocarminee132asafoodadditive
AT cheynskarlien followupofthereevaluationofindigocarminee132asafoodadditive
AT fitzgeraldreginald followupofthereevaluationofindigocarminee132asafoodadditive
AT miratmanuela followupofthereevaluationofindigocarminee132asafoodadditive
AT mortensenalicja followupofthereevaluationofindigocarminee132asafoodadditive
AT ulbrichbeate followupofthereevaluationofindigocarminee132asafoodadditive
AT woutersenruud followupofthereevaluationofindigocarminee132asafoodadditive
AT rinconanamaria followupofthereevaluationofindigocarminee132asafoodadditive
AT ruggerilaura followupofthereevaluationofindigocarminee132asafoodadditive
AT smeraldicamilla followupofthereevaluationofindigocarminee132asafoodadditive
AT tardalexandra followupofthereevaluationofindigocarminee132asafoodadditive
AT gundertremyursula followupofthereevaluationofindigocarminee132asafoodadditive