Cargando…
Measuring multiple-source based academic writing self-efficacy
Although writing self-efficacy has been a productive line of research for several decades, no prior writing self-efficacy measure has focused on students’ self-efficacy for integrating information across multiple sources when producing an academic text. To fill this gap in existing research on the m...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10373877/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37519373 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1212567 |
_version_ | 1785078654315790336 |
---|---|
author | Bråten, Ivar Haverkamp, Ymkje E. Latini, Natalia Strømsø, Helge I. |
author_facet | Bråten, Ivar Haverkamp, Ymkje E. Latini, Natalia Strømsø, Helge I. |
author_sort | Bråten, Ivar |
collection | PubMed |
description | Although writing self-efficacy has been a productive line of research for several decades, no prior writing self-efficacy measure has focused on students’ self-efficacy for integrating information across multiple sources when producing an academic text. To fill this gap in existing research on the measurement of writing motivation, we designed a measure targeting the extent to which students are confident that they can write an academic text that integrates content from several different sources. In a study with Norwegian undergraduate students (n = 136), this measure, which we called the Multiple-Source based Academic Self-Efficacy Scale (MAWSES), was validated by means of confirmatory factor analysis and relationships between the resulting unitary construct and other relevant constructs. The findings provided evidence concerning the reliability and validity of the MAWSES. In future research, this measure could be included as an independent variable to predict processes and products of multiple-source based, integrated academic writing, as a moderator or mediator of effects in writing intervention research, or as an outcome variable in its own right. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10373877 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103738772023-07-28 Measuring multiple-source based academic writing self-efficacy Bråten, Ivar Haverkamp, Ymkje E. Latini, Natalia Strømsø, Helge I. Front Psychol Psychology Although writing self-efficacy has been a productive line of research for several decades, no prior writing self-efficacy measure has focused on students’ self-efficacy for integrating information across multiple sources when producing an academic text. To fill this gap in existing research on the measurement of writing motivation, we designed a measure targeting the extent to which students are confident that they can write an academic text that integrates content from several different sources. In a study with Norwegian undergraduate students (n = 136), this measure, which we called the Multiple-Source based Academic Self-Efficacy Scale (MAWSES), was validated by means of confirmatory factor analysis and relationships between the resulting unitary construct and other relevant constructs. The findings provided evidence concerning the reliability and validity of the MAWSES. In future research, this measure could be included as an independent variable to predict processes and products of multiple-source based, integrated academic writing, as a moderator or mediator of effects in writing intervention research, or as an outcome variable in its own right. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10373877/ /pubmed/37519373 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1212567 Text en Copyright © 2023 Bråten, Haverkamp, Latini and Strømsø. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Bråten, Ivar Haverkamp, Ymkje E. Latini, Natalia Strømsø, Helge I. Measuring multiple-source based academic writing self-efficacy |
title | Measuring multiple-source based academic writing self-efficacy |
title_full | Measuring multiple-source based academic writing self-efficacy |
title_fullStr | Measuring multiple-source based academic writing self-efficacy |
title_full_unstemmed | Measuring multiple-source based academic writing self-efficacy |
title_short | Measuring multiple-source based academic writing self-efficacy |
title_sort | measuring multiple-source based academic writing self-efficacy |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10373877/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37519373 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1212567 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bratenivar measuringmultiplesourcebasedacademicwritingselfefficacy AT haverkampymkjee measuringmultiplesourcebasedacademicwritingselfefficacy AT latininatalia measuringmultiplesourcebasedacademicwritingselfefficacy AT strømsøhelgei measuringmultiplesourcebasedacademicwritingselfefficacy |