Cargando…

Measuring multiple-source based academic writing self-efficacy

Although writing self-efficacy has been a productive line of research for several decades, no prior writing self-efficacy measure has focused on students’ self-efficacy for integrating information across multiple sources when producing an academic text. To fill this gap in existing research on the m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bråten, Ivar, Haverkamp, Ymkje E., Latini, Natalia, Strømsø, Helge I.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10373877/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37519373
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1212567
_version_ 1785078654315790336
author Bråten, Ivar
Haverkamp, Ymkje E.
Latini, Natalia
Strømsø, Helge I.
author_facet Bråten, Ivar
Haverkamp, Ymkje E.
Latini, Natalia
Strømsø, Helge I.
author_sort Bråten, Ivar
collection PubMed
description Although writing self-efficacy has been a productive line of research for several decades, no prior writing self-efficacy measure has focused on students’ self-efficacy for integrating information across multiple sources when producing an academic text. To fill this gap in existing research on the measurement of writing motivation, we designed a measure targeting the extent to which students are confident that they can write an academic text that integrates content from several different sources. In a study with Norwegian undergraduate students (n = 136), this measure, which we called the Multiple-Source based Academic Self-Efficacy Scale (MAWSES), was validated by means of confirmatory factor analysis and relationships between the resulting unitary construct and other relevant constructs. The findings provided evidence concerning the reliability and validity of the MAWSES. In future research, this measure could be included as an independent variable to predict processes and products of multiple-source based, integrated academic writing, as a moderator or mediator of effects in writing intervention research, or as an outcome variable in its own right.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10373877
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103738772023-07-28 Measuring multiple-source based academic writing self-efficacy Bråten, Ivar Haverkamp, Ymkje E. Latini, Natalia Strømsø, Helge I. Front Psychol Psychology Although writing self-efficacy has been a productive line of research for several decades, no prior writing self-efficacy measure has focused on students’ self-efficacy for integrating information across multiple sources when producing an academic text. To fill this gap in existing research on the measurement of writing motivation, we designed a measure targeting the extent to which students are confident that they can write an academic text that integrates content from several different sources. In a study with Norwegian undergraduate students (n = 136), this measure, which we called the Multiple-Source based Academic Self-Efficacy Scale (MAWSES), was validated by means of confirmatory factor analysis and relationships between the resulting unitary construct and other relevant constructs. The findings provided evidence concerning the reliability and validity of the MAWSES. In future research, this measure could be included as an independent variable to predict processes and products of multiple-source based, integrated academic writing, as a moderator or mediator of effects in writing intervention research, or as an outcome variable in its own right. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10373877/ /pubmed/37519373 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1212567 Text en Copyright © 2023 Bråten, Haverkamp, Latini and Strømsø. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Bråten, Ivar
Haverkamp, Ymkje E.
Latini, Natalia
Strømsø, Helge I.
Measuring multiple-source based academic writing self-efficacy
title Measuring multiple-source based academic writing self-efficacy
title_full Measuring multiple-source based academic writing self-efficacy
title_fullStr Measuring multiple-source based academic writing self-efficacy
title_full_unstemmed Measuring multiple-source based academic writing self-efficacy
title_short Measuring multiple-source based academic writing self-efficacy
title_sort measuring multiple-source based academic writing self-efficacy
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10373877/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37519373
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1212567
work_keys_str_mv AT bratenivar measuringmultiplesourcebasedacademicwritingselfefficacy
AT haverkampymkjee measuringmultiplesourcebasedacademicwritingselfefficacy
AT latininatalia measuringmultiplesourcebasedacademicwritingselfefficacy
AT strømsøhelgei measuringmultiplesourcebasedacademicwritingselfefficacy