Cargando…

Modality-Specific Perceptual Learning of Vocoded Auditory versus Lipread Speech: Different Effects of Prior Information

Traditionally, speech perception training paradigms have not adequately taken into account the possibility that there may be modality-specific requirements for perceptual learning with auditory-only (AO) versus visual-only (VO) speech stimuli. The study reported here investigated the hypothesis that...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bernstein, Lynne E., Auer, Edward T., Eberhardt, Silvio P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10377548/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37508940
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13071008
_version_ 1785079544903892992
author Bernstein, Lynne E.
Auer, Edward T.
Eberhardt, Silvio P.
author_facet Bernstein, Lynne E.
Auer, Edward T.
Eberhardt, Silvio P.
author_sort Bernstein, Lynne E.
collection PubMed
description Traditionally, speech perception training paradigms have not adequately taken into account the possibility that there may be modality-specific requirements for perceptual learning with auditory-only (AO) versus visual-only (VO) speech stimuli. The study reported here investigated the hypothesis that there are modality-specific differences in how prior information is used by normal-hearing participants during vocoded versus VO speech training. Two different experiments, one with vocoded AO speech (Experiment 1) and one with VO, lipread, speech (Experiment 2), investigated the effects of giving different types of prior information to trainees on each trial during training. The training was for four ~20 min sessions, during which participants learned to label novel visual images using novel spoken words. Participants were assigned to different types of prior information during training: Word Group trainees saw a printed version of each training word (e.g., “tethon”), and Consonant Group trainees saw only its consonants (e.g., “t_th_n”). Additional groups received no prior information (i.e., Experiment 1, AO Group; Experiment 2, VO Group) or a spoken version of the stimulus in a different modality from the training stimuli (Experiment 1, Lipread Group; Experiment 2, Vocoder Group). That is, in each experiment, there was a group that received prior information in the modality of the training stimuli from the other experiment. In both experiments, the Word Groups had difficulty retaining the novel words they attempted to learn during training. However, when the training stimuli were vocoded, the Word Group improved their phoneme identification. When the training stimuli were visual speech, the Consonant Group improved their phoneme identification and their open-set sentence lipreading. The results are considered in light of theoretical accounts of perceptual learning in relationship to perceptual modality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10377548
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103775482023-07-29 Modality-Specific Perceptual Learning of Vocoded Auditory versus Lipread Speech: Different Effects of Prior Information Bernstein, Lynne E. Auer, Edward T. Eberhardt, Silvio P. Brain Sci Article Traditionally, speech perception training paradigms have not adequately taken into account the possibility that there may be modality-specific requirements for perceptual learning with auditory-only (AO) versus visual-only (VO) speech stimuli. The study reported here investigated the hypothesis that there are modality-specific differences in how prior information is used by normal-hearing participants during vocoded versus VO speech training. Two different experiments, one with vocoded AO speech (Experiment 1) and one with VO, lipread, speech (Experiment 2), investigated the effects of giving different types of prior information to trainees on each trial during training. The training was for four ~20 min sessions, during which participants learned to label novel visual images using novel spoken words. Participants were assigned to different types of prior information during training: Word Group trainees saw a printed version of each training word (e.g., “tethon”), and Consonant Group trainees saw only its consonants (e.g., “t_th_n”). Additional groups received no prior information (i.e., Experiment 1, AO Group; Experiment 2, VO Group) or a spoken version of the stimulus in a different modality from the training stimuli (Experiment 1, Lipread Group; Experiment 2, Vocoder Group). That is, in each experiment, there was a group that received prior information in the modality of the training stimuli from the other experiment. In both experiments, the Word Groups had difficulty retaining the novel words they attempted to learn during training. However, when the training stimuli were vocoded, the Word Group improved their phoneme identification. When the training stimuli were visual speech, the Consonant Group improved their phoneme identification and their open-set sentence lipreading. The results are considered in light of theoretical accounts of perceptual learning in relationship to perceptual modality. MDPI 2023-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10377548/ /pubmed/37508940 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13071008 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Bernstein, Lynne E.
Auer, Edward T.
Eberhardt, Silvio P.
Modality-Specific Perceptual Learning of Vocoded Auditory versus Lipread Speech: Different Effects of Prior Information
title Modality-Specific Perceptual Learning of Vocoded Auditory versus Lipread Speech: Different Effects of Prior Information
title_full Modality-Specific Perceptual Learning of Vocoded Auditory versus Lipread Speech: Different Effects of Prior Information
title_fullStr Modality-Specific Perceptual Learning of Vocoded Auditory versus Lipread Speech: Different Effects of Prior Information
title_full_unstemmed Modality-Specific Perceptual Learning of Vocoded Auditory versus Lipread Speech: Different Effects of Prior Information
title_short Modality-Specific Perceptual Learning of Vocoded Auditory versus Lipread Speech: Different Effects of Prior Information
title_sort modality-specific perceptual learning of vocoded auditory versus lipread speech: different effects of prior information
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10377548/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37508940
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13071008
work_keys_str_mv AT bernsteinlynnee modalityspecificperceptuallearningofvocodedauditoryversuslipreadspeechdifferenteffectsofpriorinformation
AT aueredwardt modalityspecificperceptuallearningofvocodedauditoryversuslipreadspeechdifferenteffectsofpriorinformation
AT eberhardtsilviop modalityspecificperceptuallearningofvocodedauditoryversuslipreadspeechdifferenteffectsofpriorinformation