Cargando…

A Randomized Controlled Trial Examining the Effect of Topical Refrigerant Spray on the Perception of an Instantaneous Noxious Stimulus

PURPOSE: Topical refrigerant spray is commonly used with routine hand injections despite mixed evidence about its efficacy in reducing the pain experience. We hypothesize that the use of topical refrigerant spray decreases the pain experience of an instantaneous noxious stimulus. METHODS: Eighty adu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gu, Brian, Williams, Ryan, Rodgers, Jake, Boehnke, Blair, Rodgers, Jeffrey
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10382877/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37521563
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsg.2023.03.006
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: Topical refrigerant spray is commonly used with routine hand injections despite mixed evidence about its efficacy in reducing the pain experience. We hypothesize that the use of topical refrigerant spray decreases the pain experience of an instantaneous noxious stimulus. METHODS: Eighty adult volunteer participants were enrolled in the study. We constructed an instrument using the smooth end of a Kirschner wire mounted to the spring of a ballpoint pen to apply an instantaneous noxious stimulus to the long (middle) finger proximal nail fold. Participants completed two trials and were randomized to receive the topical refrigerant spray before either the first or second stimulus and on either the left or right side. Participants were asked to rate the pain of each experience using an 11-point Likert scale and indicate which condition they preferred, if any. RESULTS: The mean pain ratings for the spray and no-spray conditions were 2.0 and 4.3, respectively, giving a mean difference of −2.3 (P < .001, α = 0.05). Subgroup analysis showed no significant effect of sex or medical versus nonmedical occupation (P = .28 and .11 respectively) on the mean difference in pain rating between the two conditions. Participants who received the spray first had a higher mean difference in pain rating (2.7) than that in those who received it second (1.9). Fifty-nine participants preferred the spray, whereas 21 participants either preferred no spray or had no preference (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: The use of topical refrigerant spray significantly decreased the perception of pain from an instantaneous noxious stimulus. A significant majority of participants also preferred the topical refrigerant spray condition. The use of topical refrigerant spray for painful procedures, such as needle insertions, may improve the overall patient experience. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic I.