Cargando…

Phonological and morphological literacy skills in English and Chinese: A cross‐linguistic neuroimaging comparison of Chinese–English bilingual and monolingual English children

Over the course of literacy development, children learn to recognize word sounds and meanings in print. Yet, they do so differently across alphabetic and character‐based orthographies such as English and Chinese. To uncover cross‐linguistic influences on children's literacy, we asked young Chin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Kehui, Sun, Xin, Yu, Chi‐Lin, Eggleston, Rachel L., Marks, Rebecca A., Nickerson, Nia, Caruso, Valeria C., Hu, Xiao‐Su, Tardif, Twila, Chou, Tai‐Li, Booth, James R., Kovelman, Ioulia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10400794/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37483170
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.26419
_version_ 1785084523491360768
author Zhang, Kehui
Sun, Xin
Yu, Chi‐Lin
Eggleston, Rachel L.
Marks, Rebecca A.
Nickerson, Nia
Caruso, Valeria C.
Hu, Xiao‐Su
Tardif, Twila
Chou, Tai‐Li
Booth, James R.
Kovelman, Ioulia
author_facet Zhang, Kehui
Sun, Xin
Yu, Chi‐Lin
Eggleston, Rachel L.
Marks, Rebecca A.
Nickerson, Nia
Caruso, Valeria C.
Hu, Xiao‐Su
Tardif, Twila
Chou, Tai‐Li
Booth, James R.
Kovelman, Ioulia
author_sort Zhang, Kehui
collection PubMed
description Over the course of literacy development, children learn to recognize word sounds and meanings in print. Yet, they do so differently across alphabetic and character‐based orthographies such as English and Chinese. To uncover cross‐linguistic influences on children's literacy, we asked young Chinese–English simultaneous bilinguals and English monolinguals (N = 119, ages 5–10) to complete phonological and morphological awareness (MA) literacy tasks. Children completed the tasks in the auditory modality in each of their languages during functional near‐infrared spectroscopy neuroimaging. Cross‐linguistically, comparisons between bilinguals' two languages revealed that the task that was more central to reading in a given orthography, such as phonological awareness (PA) in English and MA in Chinese, elicited less activation in the left inferior frontal and parietal regions. Group comparisons between bilinguals and monolinguals in English, their shared language of academic instruction, revealed that the left inferior frontal was less active during phonology but more active during morphology in bilinguals relative to monolinguals. MA skills are generally considered to have greater language specificity than PA skills. Bilingual literacy training in a skill that is maximally similar across languages, such as PA, may therefore yield greater automaticity for this skill, as reflected in the lower activation in bilinguals relative to monolinguals. This interpretation is supported by negative correlations between proficiency and brain activation. Together, these findings suggest that both the structural characteristics and literacy experiences with a given language can exert specific influences on bilingual and monolingual children's emerging brain networks for learning to read.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10400794
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104007942023-08-05 Phonological and morphological literacy skills in English and Chinese: A cross‐linguistic neuroimaging comparison of Chinese–English bilingual and monolingual English children Zhang, Kehui Sun, Xin Yu, Chi‐Lin Eggleston, Rachel L. Marks, Rebecca A. Nickerson, Nia Caruso, Valeria C. Hu, Xiao‐Su Tardif, Twila Chou, Tai‐Li Booth, James R. Kovelman, Ioulia Hum Brain Mapp Research Articles Over the course of literacy development, children learn to recognize word sounds and meanings in print. Yet, they do so differently across alphabetic and character‐based orthographies such as English and Chinese. To uncover cross‐linguistic influences on children's literacy, we asked young Chinese–English simultaneous bilinguals and English monolinguals (N = 119, ages 5–10) to complete phonological and morphological awareness (MA) literacy tasks. Children completed the tasks in the auditory modality in each of their languages during functional near‐infrared spectroscopy neuroimaging. Cross‐linguistically, comparisons between bilinguals' two languages revealed that the task that was more central to reading in a given orthography, such as phonological awareness (PA) in English and MA in Chinese, elicited less activation in the left inferior frontal and parietal regions. Group comparisons between bilinguals and monolinguals in English, their shared language of academic instruction, revealed that the left inferior frontal was less active during phonology but more active during morphology in bilinguals relative to monolinguals. MA skills are generally considered to have greater language specificity than PA skills. Bilingual literacy training in a skill that is maximally similar across languages, such as PA, may therefore yield greater automaticity for this skill, as reflected in the lower activation in bilinguals relative to monolinguals. This interpretation is supported by negative correlations between proficiency and brain activation. Together, these findings suggest that both the structural characteristics and literacy experiences with a given language can exert specific influences on bilingual and monolingual children's emerging brain networks for learning to read. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2023-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10400794/ /pubmed/37483170 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.26419 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Human Brain Mapping published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Zhang, Kehui
Sun, Xin
Yu, Chi‐Lin
Eggleston, Rachel L.
Marks, Rebecca A.
Nickerson, Nia
Caruso, Valeria C.
Hu, Xiao‐Su
Tardif, Twila
Chou, Tai‐Li
Booth, James R.
Kovelman, Ioulia
Phonological and morphological literacy skills in English and Chinese: A cross‐linguistic neuroimaging comparison of Chinese–English bilingual and monolingual English children
title Phonological and morphological literacy skills in English and Chinese: A cross‐linguistic neuroimaging comparison of Chinese–English bilingual and monolingual English children
title_full Phonological and morphological literacy skills in English and Chinese: A cross‐linguistic neuroimaging comparison of Chinese–English bilingual and monolingual English children
title_fullStr Phonological and morphological literacy skills in English and Chinese: A cross‐linguistic neuroimaging comparison of Chinese–English bilingual and monolingual English children
title_full_unstemmed Phonological and morphological literacy skills in English and Chinese: A cross‐linguistic neuroimaging comparison of Chinese–English bilingual and monolingual English children
title_short Phonological and morphological literacy skills in English and Chinese: A cross‐linguistic neuroimaging comparison of Chinese–English bilingual and monolingual English children
title_sort phonological and morphological literacy skills in english and chinese: a cross‐linguistic neuroimaging comparison of chinese–english bilingual and monolingual english children
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10400794/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37483170
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.26419
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangkehui phonologicalandmorphologicalliteracyskillsinenglishandchineseacrosslinguisticneuroimagingcomparisonofchineseenglishbilingualandmonolingualenglishchildren
AT sunxin phonologicalandmorphologicalliteracyskillsinenglishandchineseacrosslinguisticneuroimagingcomparisonofchineseenglishbilingualandmonolingualenglishchildren
AT yuchilin phonologicalandmorphologicalliteracyskillsinenglishandchineseacrosslinguisticneuroimagingcomparisonofchineseenglishbilingualandmonolingualenglishchildren
AT egglestonrachell phonologicalandmorphologicalliteracyskillsinenglishandchineseacrosslinguisticneuroimagingcomparisonofchineseenglishbilingualandmonolingualenglishchildren
AT marksrebeccaa phonologicalandmorphologicalliteracyskillsinenglishandchineseacrosslinguisticneuroimagingcomparisonofchineseenglishbilingualandmonolingualenglishchildren
AT nickersonnia phonologicalandmorphologicalliteracyskillsinenglishandchineseacrosslinguisticneuroimagingcomparisonofchineseenglishbilingualandmonolingualenglishchildren
AT carusovaleriac phonologicalandmorphologicalliteracyskillsinenglishandchineseacrosslinguisticneuroimagingcomparisonofchineseenglishbilingualandmonolingualenglishchildren
AT huxiaosu phonologicalandmorphologicalliteracyskillsinenglishandchineseacrosslinguisticneuroimagingcomparisonofchineseenglishbilingualandmonolingualenglishchildren
AT tardiftwila phonologicalandmorphologicalliteracyskillsinenglishandchineseacrosslinguisticneuroimagingcomparisonofchineseenglishbilingualandmonolingualenglishchildren
AT choutaili phonologicalandmorphologicalliteracyskillsinenglishandchineseacrosslinguisticneuroimagingcomparisonofchineseenglishbilingualandmonolingualenglishchildren
AT boothjamesr phonologicalandmorphologicalliteracyskillsinenglishandchineseacrosslinguisticneuroimagingcomparisonofchineseenglishbilingualandmonolingualenglishchildren
AT kovelmanioulia phonologicalandmorphologicalliteracyskillsinenglishandchineseacrosslinguisticneuroimagingcomparisonofchineseenglishbilingualandmonolingualenglishchildren