Cargando…
Comparison of 6 DNA extraction methods for isolation of high yield of high molecular weight DNA suitable for shotgun metagenomics Nanopore sequencing to detect bacteria
BACKGROUND: Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) offers an accessible platform for long-read sequencing, which improves the reconstruction of genomes and helps to resolve complex genomic contexts, especially in the case of metagenome analysis. To take the best advantage of long-read sequencing, DNA ex...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10401787/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37537550 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-023-09537-5 |
_version_ | 1785084739752820736 |
---|---|
author | Gand, Mathieu Bloemen, Bram Vanneste, Kevin Roosens, Nancy H. C. De Keersmaecker, Sigrid C. J. |
author_facet | Gand, Mathieu Bloemen, Bram Vanneste, Kevin Roosens, Nancy H. C. De Keersmaecker, Sigrid C. J. |
author_sort | Gand, Mathieu |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) offers an accessible platform for long-read sequencing, which improves the reconstruction of genomes and helps to resolve complex genomic contexts, especially in the case of metagenome analysis. To take the best advantage of long-read sequencing, DNA extraction methods must be able to isolate pure high molecular weight (HMW) DNA from complex metagenomics samples, without introducing any bias. New methods released on the market, and protocols developed at the research level, were specifically designed for this application and need to be assessed. RESULTS: In this study, with different bacterial cocktail mixes, analyzed as pure or spiked in a synthetic fecal matrix, we evaluated the performances of 6 DNA extraction methods using various cells lysis and purification techniques, from quick and easy, to more time-consuming and gentle protocols, including a portable method for on-site application. In addition to the comparison of the quality, quantity and purity of the extracted DNA, the performance obtained when doing Nanopore sequencing on a MinION flow cell was also tested. From the obtained results, the Quick-DNA HMW MagBead Kit (Zymo Research) was selected as producing the best yield of pure HMW DNA. Furthermore, this kit allowed an accurate detection, by Nanopore sequencing, of almost all the bacterial species present in a complex mock community. CONCLUSION: Amongst the 6 tested methods, the Quick-DNA HMW MagBead Kit (Zymo Research) was considered as the most suitable for Nanopore sequencing and would be recommended for bacterial metagenomics studies using this technology. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12864-023-09537-5. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10401787 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104017872023-08-05 Comparison of 6 DNA extraction methods for isolation of high yield of high molecular weight DNA suitable for shotgun metagenomics Nanopore sequencing to detect bacteria Gand, Mathieu Bloemen, Bram Vanneste, Kevin Roosens, Nancy H. C. De Keersmaecker, Sigrid C. J. BMC Genomics Research BACKGROUND: Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) offers an accessible platform for long-read sequencing, which improves the reconstruction of genomes and helps to resolve complex genomic contexts, especially in the case of metagenome analysis. To take the best advantage of long-read sequencing, DNA extraction methods must be able to isolate pure high molecular weight (HMW) DNA from complex metagenomics samples, without introducing any bias. New methods released on the market, and protocols developed at the research level, were specifically designed for this application and need to be assessed. RESULTS: In this study, with different bacterial cocktail mixes, analyzed as pure or spiked in a synthetic fecal matrix, we evaluated the performances of 6 DNA extraction methods using various cells lysis and purification techniques, from quick and easy, to more time-consuming and gentle protocols, including a portable method for on-site application. In addition to the comparison of the quality, quantity and purity of the extracted DNA, the performance obtained when doing Nanopore sequencing on a MinION flow cell was also tested. From the obtained results, the Quick-DNA HMW MagBead Kit (Zymo Research) was selected as producing the best yield of pure HMW DNA. Furthermore, this kit allowed an accurate detection, by Nanopore sequencing, of almost all the bacterial species present in a complex mock community. CONCLUSION: Amongst the 6 tested methods, the Quick-DNA HMW MagBead Kit (Zymo Research) was considered as the most suitable for Nanopore sequencing and would be recommended for bacterial metagenomics studies using this technology. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12864-023-09537-5. BioMed Central 2023-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10401787/ /pubmed/37537550 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-023-09537-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Gand, Mathieu Bloemen, Bram Vanneste, Kevin Roosens, Nancy H. C. De Keersmaecker, Sigrid C. J. Comparison of 6 DNA extraction methods for isolation of high yield of high molecular weight DNA suitable for shotgun metagenomics Nanopore sequencing to detect bacteria |
title | Comparison of 6 DNA extraction methods for isolation of high yield of high molecular weight DNA suitable for shotgun metagenomics Nanopore sequencing to detect bacteria |
title_full | Comparison of 6 DNA extraction methods for isolation of high yield of high molecular weight DNA suitable for shotgun metagenomics Nanopore sequencing to detect bacteria |
title_fullStr | Comparison of 6 DNA extraction methods for isolation of high yield of high molecular weight DNA suitable for shotgun metagenomics Nanopore sequencing to detect bacteria |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of 6 DNA extraction methods for isolation of high yield of high molecular weight DNA suitable for shotgun metagenomics Nanopore sequencing to detect bacteria |
title_short | Comparison of 6 DNA extraction methods for isolation of high yield of high molecular weight DNA suitable for shotgun metagenomics Nanopore sequencing to detect bacteria |
title_sort | comparison of 6 dna extraction methods for isolation of high yield of high molecular weight dna suitable for shotgun metagenomics nanopore sequencing to detect bacteria |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10401787/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37537550 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-023-09537-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gandmathieu comparisonof6dnaextractionmethodsforisolationofhighyieldofhighmolecularweightdnasuitableforshotgunmetagenomicsnanoporesequencingtodetectbacteria AT bloemenbram comparisonof6dnaextractionmethodsforisolationofhighyieldofhighmolecularweightdnasuitableforshotgunmetagenomicsnanoporesequencingtodetectbacteria AT vannestekevin comparisonof6dnaextractionmethodsforisolationofhighyieldofhighmolecularweightdnasuitableforshotgunmetagenomicsnanoporesequencingtodetectbacteria AT roosensnancyhc comparisonof6dnaextractionmethodsforisolationofhighyieldofhighmolecularweightdnasuitableforshotgunmetagenomicsnanoporesequencingtodetectbacteria AT dekeersmaeckersigridcj comparisonof6dnaextractionmethodsforisolationofhighyieldofhighmolecularweightdnasuitableforshotgunmetagenomicsnanoporesequencingtodetectbacteria |