Cargando…

Comparison of 6 DNA extraction methods for isolation of high yield of high molecular weight DNA suitable for shotgun metagenomics Nanopore sequencing to detect bacteria

BACKGROUND: Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) offers an accessible platform for long-read sequencing, which improves the reconstruction of genomes and helps to resolve complex genomic contexts, especially in the case of metagenome analysis. To take the best advantage of long-read sequencing, DNA ex...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gand, Mathieu, Bloemen, Bram, Vanneste, Kevin, Roosens, Nancy H. C., De Keersmaecker, Sigrid C. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10401787/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37537550
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-023-09537-5
_version_ 1785084739752820736
author Gand, Mathieu
Bloemen, Bram
Vanneste, Kevin
Roosens, Nancy H. C.
De Keersmaecker, Sigrid C. J.
author_facet Gand, Mathieu
Bloemen, Bram
Vanneste, Kevin
Roosens, Nancy H. C.
De Keersmaecker, Sigrid C. J.
author_sort Gand, Mathieu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) offers an accessible platform for long-read sequencing, which improves the reconstruction of genomes and helps to resolve complex genomic contexts, especially in the case of metagenome analysis. To take the best advantage of long-read sequencing, DNA extraction methods must be able to isolate pure high molecular weight (HMW) DNA from complex metagenomics samples, without introducing any bias. New methods released on the market, and protocols developed at the research level, were specifically designed for this application and need to be assessed. RESULTS: In this study, with different bacterial cocktail mixes, analyzed as pure or spiked in a synthetic fecal matrix, we evaluated the performances of 6 DNA extraction methods using various cells lysis and purification techniques, from quick and easy, to more time-consuming and gentle protocols, including a portable method for on-site application. In addition to the comparison of the quality, quantity and purity of the extracted DNA, the performance obtained when doing Nanopore sequencing on a MinION flow cell was also tested. From the obtained results, the Quick-DNA HMW MagBead Kit (Zymo Research) was selected as producing the best yield of pure HMW DNA. Furthermore, this kit allowed an accurate detection, by Nanopore sequencing, of almost all the bacterial species present in a complex mock community. CONCLUSION: Amongst the 6 tested methods, the Quick-DNA HMW MagBead Kit (Zymo Research) was considered as the most suitable for Nanopore sequencing and would be recommended for bacterial metagenomics studies using this technology. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12864-023-09537-5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10401787
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104017872023-08-05 Comparison of 6 DNA extraction methods for isolation of high yield of high molecular weight DNA suitable for shotgun metagenomics Nanopore sequencing to detect bacteria Gand, Mathieu Bloemen, Bram Vanneste, Kevin Roosens, Nancy H. C. De Keersmaecker, Sigrid C. J. BMC Genomics Research BACKGROUND: Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) offers an accessible platform for long-read sequencing, which improves the reconstruction of genomes and helps to resolve complex genomic contexts, especially in the case of metagenome analysis. To take the best advantage of long-read sequencing, DNA extraction methods must be able to isolate pure high molecular weight (HMW) DNA from complex metagenomics samples, without introducing any bias. New methods released on the market, and protocols developed at the research level, were specifically designed for this application and need to be assessed. RESULTS: In this study, with different bacterial cocktail mixes, analyzed as pure or spiked in a synthetic fecal matrix, we evaluated the performances of 6 DNA extraction methods using various cells lysis and purification techniques, from quick and easy, to more time-consuming and gentle protocols, including a portable method for on-site application. In addition to the comparison of the quality, quantity and purity of the extracted DNA, the performance obtained when doing Nanopore sequencing on a MinION flow cell was also tested. From the obtained results, the Quick-DNA HMW MagBead Kit (Zymo Research) was selected as producing the best yield of pure HMW DNA. Furthermore, this kit allowed an accurate detection, by Nanopore sequencing, of almost all the bacterial species present in a complex mock community. CONCLUSION: Amongst the 6 tested methods, the Quick-DNA HMW MagBead Kit (Zymo Research) was considered as the most suitable for Nanopore sequencing and would be recommended for bacterial metagenomics studies using this technology. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12864-023-09537-5. BioMed Central 2023-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10401787/ /pubmed/37537550 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-023-09537-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Gand, Mathieu
Bloemen, Bram
Vanneste, Kevin
Roosens, Nancy H. C.
De Keersmaecker, Sigrid C. J.
Comparison of 6 DNA extraction methods for isolation of high yield of high molecular weight DNA suitable for shotgun metagenomics Nanopore sequencing to detect bacteria
title Comparison of 6 DNA extraction methods for isolation of high yield of high molecular weight DNA suitable for shotgun metagenomics Nanopore sequencing to detect bacteria
title_full Comparison of 6 DNA extraction methods for isolation of high yield of high molecular weight DNA suitable for shotgun metagenomics Nanopore sequencing to detect bacteria
title_fullStr Comparison of 6 DNA extraction methods for isolation of high yield of high molecular weight DNA suitable for shotgun metagenomics Nanopore sequencing to detect bacteria
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of 6 DNA extraction methods for isolation of high yield of high molecular weight DNA suitable for shotgun metagenomics Nanopore sequencing to detect bacteria
title_short Comparison of 6 DNA extraction methods for isolation of high yield of high molecular weight DNA suitable for shotgun metagenomics Nanopore sequencing to detect bacteria
title_sort comparison of 6 dna extraction methods for isolation of high yield of high molecular weight dna suitable for shotgun metagenomics nanopore sequencing to detect bacteria
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10401787/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37537550
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-023-09537-5
work_keys_str_mv AT gandmathieu comparisonof6dnaextractionmethodsforisolationofhighyieldofhighmolecularweightdnasuitableforshotgunmetagenomicsnanoporesequencingtodetectbacteria
AT bloemenbram comparisonof6dnaextractionmethodsforisolationofhighyieldofhighmolecularweightdnasuitableforshotgunmetagenomicsnanoporesequencingtodetectbacteria
AT vannestekevin comparisonof6dnaextractionmethodsforisolationofhighyieldofhighmolecularweightdnasuitableforshotgunmetagenomicsnanoporesequencingtodetectbacteria
AT roosensnancyhc comparisonof6dnaextractionmethodsforisolationofhighyieldofhighmolecularweightdnasuitableforshotgunmetagenomicsnanoporesequencingtodetectbacteria
AT dekeersmaeckersigridcj comparisonof6dnaextractionmethodsforisolationofhighyieldofhighmolecularweightdnasuitableforshotgunmetagenomicsnanoporesequencingtodetectbacteria