Cargando…

Endourological Options for Small (< 2 cm) Lower Pole Stones — Does the Lower Pole Angle Matter?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Small renal stones in the lower pole are often difficult to treat. The angle of the lower pole to the renal pelvis (lower pole angle) is a limiting factor to rendering the patient stone free. This review explores the definitions of the lower pole angle, the various treatment optio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Luk, Angus, Geraghty, Robert, Somani, Bhaskar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10403423/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37097431
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11934-023-01161-w
_version_ 1785085065312600064
author Luk, Angus
Geraghty, Robert
Somani, Bhaskar
author_facet Luk, Angus
Geraghty, Robert
Somani, Bhaskar
author_sort Luk, Angus
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Small renal stones in the lower pole are often difficult to treat. The angle of the lower pole to the renal pelvis (lower pole angle) is a limiting factor to rendering the patient stone free. This review explores the definitions of the lower pole angle, the various treatment options available, and how outcomes are influenced by the angle. RECENT FINDINGS: It is clear the lower pole angle definition varies widely depending on described technique and imaging modality. However, it is clear that outcomes are worse with a steeper angle, especially for shock wave lithotripsy and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS). Percutaneous nephrolithotomy has similar reported outcomes to RIRS, and there is limited evidence it may be superior for steeper angles over RIRS. SUMMARY: Lower pole stones can be technically challenging and adequate assessment prior to choosing operative approach is key.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10403423
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104034232023-08-06 Endourological Options for Small (< 2 cm) Lower Pole Stones — Does the Lower Pole Angle Matter? Luk, Angus Geraghty, Robert Somani, Bhaskar Curr Urol Rep Article PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Small renal stones in the lower pole are often difficult to treat. The angle of the lower pole to the renal pelvis (lower pole angle) is a limiting factor to rendering the patient stone free. This review explores the definitions of the lower pole angle, the various treatment options available, and how outcomes are influenced by the angle. RECENT FINDINGS: It is clear the lower pole angle definition varies widely depending on described technique and imaging modality. However, it is clear that outcomes are worse with a steeper angle, especially for shock wave lithotripsy and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS). Percutaneous nephrolithotomy has similar reported outcomes to RIRS, and there is limited evidence it may be superior for steeper angles over RIRS. SUMMARY: Lower pole stones can be technically challenging and adequate assessment prior to choosing operative approach is key. Springer US 2023-04-25 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10403423/ /pubmed/37097431 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11934-023-01161-w Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Luk, Angus
Geraghty, Robert
Somani, Bhaskar
Endourological Options for Small (< 2 cm) Lower Pole Stones — Does the Lower Pole Angle Matter?
title Endourological Options for Small (< 2 cm) Lower Pole Stones — Does the Lower Pole Angle Matter?
title_full Endourological Options for Small (< 2 cm) Lower Pole Stones — Does the Lower Pole Angle Matter?
title_fullStr Endourological Options for Small (< 2 cm) Lower Pole Stones — Does the Lower Pole Angle Matter?
title_full_unstemmed Endourological Options for Small (< 2 cm) Lower Pole Stones — Does the Lower Pole Angle Matter?
title_short Endourological Options for Small (< 2 cm) Lower Pole Stones — Does the Lower Pole Angle Matter?
title_sort endourological options for small (< 2 cm) lower pole stones — does the lower pole angle matter?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10403423/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37097431
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11934-023-01161-w
work_keys_str_mv AT lukangus endourologicaloptionsforsmall2cmlowerpolestonesdoesthelowerpoleanglematter
AT geraghtyrobert endourologicaloptionsforsmall2cmlowerpolestonesdoesthelowerpoleanglematter
AT somanibhaskar endourologicaloptionsforsmall2cmlowerpolestonesdoesthelowerpoleanglematter