Cargando…

Comparison of Quantitative Mass Spectrometric Methods for Drug Target Identification by Thermal Proteome Profiling

[Image: see text] Thermal proteome profiling (TPP) provides a powerful approach to studying proteome-wide interactions of small therapeutic molecules and their target and off-target proteins, complementing phenotypic-based drug screens. Detecting differences in thermal stability due to target engage...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: George, Amy L., Sidgwick, Frances R., Watt, Jessica E., Martin, Mathew P., Trost, Matthias, Marín-Rubio, José Luis, Dueñas, Maria Emilia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2023
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10407934/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37439223
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jproteome.3c00111
_version_ 1785086074484162560
author George, Amy L.
Sidgwick, Frances R.
Watt, Jessica E.
Martin, Mathew P.
Trost, Matthias
Marín-Rubio, José Luis
Dueñas, Maria Emilia
author_facet George, Amy L.
Sidgwick, Frances R.
Watt, Jessica E.
Martin, Mathew P.
Trost, Matthias
Marín-Rubio, José Luis
Dueñas, Maria Emilia
author_sort George, Amy L.
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] Thermal proteome profiling (TPP) provides a powerful approach to studying proteome-wide interactions of small therapeutic molecules and their target and off-target proteins, complementing phenotypic-based drug screens. Detecting differences in thermal stability due to target engagement requires high quantitative accuracy and consistent detection. Isobaric tandem mass tags (TMTs) are used to multiplex samples and increase quantification precision in TPP analysis by data-dependent acquisition (DDA). However, advances in data-independent acquisition (DIA) can provide higher sensitivity and protein coverage with reduced costs and sample preparation steps. Herein, we explored the performance of different DIA-based label-free quantification approaches compared to TMT-DDA for thermal shift quantitation. Acute myeloid leukemia cells were treated with losmapimod, a known inhibitor of MAPK14 (p38α). Label-free DIA approaches, and particularly the library-free mode in DIA-NN, were comparable of TMT-DDA in their ability to detect target engagement of losmapimod with MAPK14 and one of its downstream targets, MAPKAPK3. Using DIA for thermal shift quantitation is a cost-effective alternative to labeled quantitation in the TPP pipeline.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10407934
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104079342023-08-09 Comparison of Quantitative Mass Spectrometric Methods for Drug Target Identification by Thermal Proteome Profiling George, Amy L. Sidgwick, Frances R. Watt, Jessica E. Martin, Mathew P. Trost, Matthias Marín-Rubio, José Luis Dueñas, Maria Emilia J Proteome Res [Image: see text] Thermal proteome profiling (TPP) provides a powerful approach to studying proteome-wide interactions of small therapeutic molecules and their target and off-target proteins, complementing phenotypic-based drug screens. Detecting differences in thermal stability due to target engagement requires high quantitative accuracy and consistent detection. Isobaric tandem mass tags (TMTs) are used to multiplex samples and increase quantification precision in TPP analysis by data-dependent acquisition (DDA). However, advances in data-independent acquisition (DIA) can provide higher sensitivity and protein coverage with reduced costs and sample preparation steps. Herein, we explored the performance of different DIA-based label-free quantification approaches compared to TMT-DDA for thermal shift quantitation. Acute myeloid leukemia cells were treated with losmapimod, a known inhibitor of MAPK14 (p38α). Label-free DIA approaches, and particularly the library-free mode in DIA-NN, were comparable of TMT-DDA in their ability to detect target engagement of losmapimod with MAPK14 and one of its downstream targets, MAPKAPK3. Using DIA for thermal shift quantitation is a cost-effective alternative to labeled quantitation in the TPP pipeline. American Chemical Society 2023-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10407934/ /pubmed/37439223 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jproteome.3c00111 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Permits the broadest form of re-use including for commercial purposes, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle George, Amy L.
Sidgwick, Frances R.
Watt, Jessica E.
Martin, Mathew P.
Trost, Matthias
Marín-Rubio, José Luis
Dueñas, Maria Emilia
Comparison of Quantitative Mass Spectrometric Methods for Drug Target Identification by Thermal Proteome Profiling
title Comparison of Quantitative Mass Spectrometric Methods for Drug Target Identification by Thermal Proteome Profiling
title_full Comparison of Quantitative Mass Spectrometric Methods for Drug Target Identification by Thermal Proteome Profiling
title_fullStr Comparison of Quantitative Mass Spectrometric Methods for Drug Target Identification by Thermal Proteome Profiling
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Quantitative Mass Spectrometric Methods for Drug Target Identification by Thermal Proteome Profiling
title_short Comparison of Quantitative Mass Spectrometric Methods for Drug Target Identification by Thermal Proteome Profiling
title_sort comparison of quantitative mass spectrometric methods for drug target identification by thermal proteome profiling
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10407934/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37439223
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jproteome.3c00111
work_keys_str_mv AT georgeamyl comparisonofquantitativemassspectrometricmethodsfordrugtargetidentificationbythermalproteomeprofiling
AT sidgwickfrancesr comparisonofquantitativemassspectrometricmethodsfordrugtargetidentificationbythermalproteomeprofiling
AT wattjessicae comparisonofquantitativemassspectrometricmethodsfordrugtargetidentificationbythermalproteomeprofiling
AT martinmathewp comparisonofquantitativemassspectrometricmethodsfordrugtargetidentificationbythermalproteomeprofiling
AT trostmatthias comparisonofquantitativemassspectrometricmethodsfordrugtargetidentificationbythermalproteomeprofiling
AT marinrubiojoseluis comparisonofquantitativemassspectrometricmethodsfordrugtargetidentificationbythermalproteomeprofiling
AT duenasmariaemilia comparisonofquantitativemassspectrometricmethodsfordrugtargetidentificationbythermalproteomeprofiling