Cargando…

Application of ATR-FTIR Incorporated with Multivariate Data Analysis for Discrimination and Quantification of Urea as an Adulterant in UHT Milk

Urea is naturally present in milk, yet urea is added intentionally to increase milk’s nitrogen content and shelf life. In this study, a total of 50 Ultra heat treatment (UHT) milk samples were spiked with known urea concentrations (0–5 w/v%). Attenuated total reflectance–Fourier transform infrared (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tan, Emeline, Binti Julmohammad, Norliza, Koh, Wee Yin, Abdullah Sani, Muhamad Shirwan, Rasti, Babak
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10417858/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37569123
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods12152855
_version_ 1785088139717509120
author Tan, Emeline
Binti Julmohammad, Norliza
Koh, Wee Yin
Abdullah Sani, Muhamad Shirwan
Rasti, Babak
author_facet Tan, Emeline
Binti Julmohammad, Norliza
Koh, Wee Yin
Abdullah Sani, Muhamad Shirwan
Rasti, Babak
author_sort Tan, Emeline
collection PubMed
description Urea is naturally present in milk, yet urea is added intentionally to increase milk’s nitrogen content and shelf life. In this study, a total of 50 Ultra heat treatment (UHT) milk samples were spiked with known urea concentrations (0–5 w/v%). Attenuated total reflectance–Fourier transform infrared (ATR-FTIR) spectroscopy with principal component analysis (PCA), discriminant analysis (DA), and multiple linear regression (MLR) were used for the discrimination and quantification of urea. The PCA was built using 387 variables with higher FL > 0.75 from the first PCA with cumulative variability (90.036%). Subsequently, the DA model was built using the same variables from PCA and demonstrated the good distinction between unadulterated and adulterated milk, with a correct classification rate of 98% for cross-validation. The MLR model used 48 variables with p-value < 0.05 from the DA model and gave R(2) values greater than 0.90, with RMSE and MSE below 1 for cross-validation and prediction. The DA and MLR models were then validated externally using a test dataset, which shows 100% correct classification, and the t-test result (p > 0.05) indicated that the MLR could determine the percentage of urea in UHT milk within the permission limit (70 mg/mL). In short, the wavenumbers 1626.63, 1601.98, and 1585.5534 cm(−1) are suitable as fingerprint regions for detecting urea in UHT milk.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10417858
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104178582023-08-12 Application of ATR-FTIR Incorporated with Multivariate Data Analysis for Discrimination and Quantification of Urea as an Adulterant in UHT Milk Tan, Emeline Binti Julmohammad, Norliza Koh, Wee Yin Abdullah Sani, Muhamad Shirwan Rasti, Babak Foods Article Urea is naturally present in milk, yet urea is added intentionally to increase milk’s nitrogen content and shelf life. In this study, a total of 50 Ultra heat treatment (UHT) milk samples were spiked with known urea concentrations (0–5 w/v%). Attenuated total reflectance–Fourier transform infrared (ATR-FTIR) spectroscopy with principal component analysis (PCA), discriminant analysis (DA), and multiple linear regression (MLR) were used for the discrimination and quantification of urea. The PCA was built using 387 variables with higher FL > 0.75 from the first PCA with cumulative variability (90.036%). Subsequently, the DA model was built using the same variables from PCA and demonstrated the good distinction between unadulterated and adulterated milk, with a correct classification rate of 98% for cross-validation. The MLR model used 48 variables with p-value < 0.05 from the DA model and gave R(2) values greater than 0.90, with RMSE and MSE below 1 for cross-validation and prediction. The DA and MLR models were then validated externally using a test dataset, which shows 100% correct classification, and the t-test result (p > 0.05) indicated that the MLR could determine the percentage of urea in UHT milk within the permission limit (70 mg/mL). In short, the wavenumbers 1626.63, 1601.98, and 1585.5534 cm(−1) are suitable as fingerprint regions for detecting urea in UHT milk. MDPI 2023-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10417858/ /pubmed/37569123 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods12152855 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Tan, Emeline
Binti Julmohammad, Norliza
Koh, Wee Yin
Abdullah Sani, Muhamad Shirwan
Rasti, Babak
Application of ATR-FTIR Incorporated with Multivariate Data Analysis for Discrimination and Quantification of Urea as an Adulterant in UHT Milk
title Application of ATR-FTIR Incorporated with Multivariate Data Analysis for Discrimination and Quantification of Urea as an Adulterant in UHT Milk
title_full Application of ATR-FTIR Incorporated with Multivariate Data Analysis for Discrimination and Quantification of Urea as an Adulterant in UHT Milk
title_fullStr Application of ATR-FTIR Incorporated with Multivariate Data Analysis for Discrimination and Quantification of Urea as an Adulterant in UHT Milk
title_full_unstemmed Application of ATR-FTIR Incorporated with Multivariate Data Analysis for Discrimination and Quantification of Urea as an Adulterant in UHT Milk
title_short Application of ATR-FTIR Incorporated with Multivariate Data Analysis for Discrimination and Quantification of Urea as an Adulterant in UHT Milk
title_sort application of atr-ftir incorporated with multivariate data analysis for discrimination and quantification of urea as an adulterant in uht milk
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10417858/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37569123
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods12152855
work_keys_str_mv AT tanemeline applicationofatrftirincorporatedwithmultivariatedataanalysisfordiscriminationandquantificationofureaasanadulterantinuhtmilk
AT bintijulmohammadnorliza applicationofatrftirincorporatedwithmultivariatedataanalysisfordiscriminationandquantificationofureaasanadulterantinuhtmilk
AT kohweeyin applicationofatrftirincorporatedwithmultivariatedataanalysisfordiscriminationandquantificationofureaasanadulterantinuhtmilk
AT abdullahsanimuhamadshirwan applicationofatrftirincorporatedwithmultivariatedataanalysisfordiscriminationandquantificationofureaasanadulterantinuhtmilk
AT rastibabak applicationofatrftirincorporatedwithmultivariatedataanalysisfordiscriminationandquantificationofureaasanadulterantinuhtmilk